Well, maybe you ought to quote my actual language "has been" rather than switch it to "being in" and then arguing against your own strawman construction.
You have in the past accused others of dodging your questions, but often do so yourself, as in this example.
Then you start the "Grammar war" by attempting to divert attention from the real issue to "has been" versus "being in" as if it really made any difference!
Let's face it... your posts only intend to paint a bad picture of IH, using extremely unlikely or even unfounded views while letting Rossi's proven antics slide by without any repudiation.
Only when called out, do you occasionally make a statement such as "Rossi is no saint either". But even then you attempt to make comparative allegations by adding the word "either" there.
So much for the grammar wars! So much for not being biased and only "seeking truth".
I do not reply to such as SSC and ele as they make it quite clear. They are totally on Rossi's side and will support him to the end. That is fine, it is their choice and right. They are up front about it.
However, your "only seeking for truth" BS rubs me quite irritated as it is quite evident by your posts being filled only with anti-IH rhetoric. Not holding Rossi anywhere near to the same level of
accountability (if at all) while always defaming IH is not "seeking for truth", you simply will not admit it!
I once read a quote, but do not know the author :
"Keep your distance from people who will never admit
they are wrong and always try to make you feel like
it's all your fault"
It is interesting how the majority of Rossi supporters try to make this entire drama "IH's fault" or at least divert the attention from Rossi to IH.
They cannot defend Rossi on his merits, so they try to tear down IH. Sad.
I have not posted for some time and will most likely refrain from much in the future. There is no point in arguing with a mind set like above.
Good day everyone