The Totally Civil Covid Thread. (Closing 31/05)

Paxlovid: Study finds no benefit in Pfizer Covid pill for younger adults

WASHINGTON (AP) — Pfizer’s COVID-19 pill appears to provide little or no benefit for younger adults, while still reducing the risk of hospitalization and death for high-risk seniors, according to a large study published Wednesday.

The results from a 109,000-patient Israeli study are likely to renew questions about the U.S. government’s use of Paxlovid, which has become the go-to treatment for COVID-19 due to its at-home convenience. The Biden administration has spent more than $10 billion purchasing the drug and making it available at thousands of pharmacies through its test-and-treat initiative.

it fails on the elderly too. Ask the president, his wife or the little troll, you might even want to ask Pfizer CEO, all victims of Paxcrap rebound also the biggest supporters of this crap!!!

First lady Jill Biden tests positive for COVID in 'rebound' case

First lady Jill Biden tests positive for COVID in 'rebound' case

First lady Jill Biden has tested positive for COVID-19 in a "rebound" case, her deputy communications director said Wednesday. "After testing...

www.marketwatch.com

First lady Jill Biden has tested positive for COVID-19 in a "rebound" case, her deputy communications director said Wednesday. "After testing negative on Tuesday, just now, the First Lady has tested positive for COVID-19 by antigen testing. This represents a 'rebound' positivity," said Biden's deputy communications director Kelsey Donohue in a statement. Biden, who left isolation on Sunday after earlier testing positive, has experienced no reemergence of symptoms and will remain in Delaware, Donohue said. President Joe Biden tested negative Wednesday morning but will mask for 10 days indoors and in close proximity to others, since he is a close contact of the first lady, a White House official said.

When did Swiss excess mortality late 2021 start? Easy to find.

Just some days after the start of the booster campaign (1.11.2021). VAX-stat :: https://www.covid19.admin.ch/de/vaccination/persons

Was there a Covid wave ? No:: https://www.covid19.admin.ch/d…miologic/case?time=phase4 (select from June 2021)

The well documented excess mortality peek (start about 15.11.2021) outside a wave :: https://www.experimental.bfs.a…vative-methoden/momo.html

Who additionally did die from Covid? The boostered oldies (as in Israel where we had > 10 boostered deaths/day)... https://www.covid19.admin.ch/d…iologic/death?time=phase4

Another vaccine narrative going south!

Long COVID in Children Appears Less Common Than Early Fears Suggested

Although the risk of long COVID is not insignificant, it is much lower than previously thought

Long COVID in Children Appears Less Common Than Early Fears Suggested - Scientific American

Long COVID—the constellation of symptoms that can persist long after an initial coronavirus infection—has been a source of fear among parents throughout the pandemic. But just how often are children affected? Conflicting and evolving messages can leave a parent both terrified and wildly confused. Now a consensus is emerging that long COVID in children is a real risk but a significantly smaller one than some earlier research indicated.

Early fears were justified. Studies at the beginning of the pandemic reported alarming numbers: one review suggested long COVID could impact as many as 66 percent of children. But some experts say that the early reports included several biases. “I never took the original studies at their face value,” says Stephen Freedman, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Calgary in Alberta. “The methodological limitations of those studies were significant and not fitting with what we were seeing clinically.”

Quote from Roseland67

https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/26…und-how-common/index.html

No benifit ages 1- 65 and a 75% reduction in symptoms in over 65 but with a chance of rebound and worsening symtoms. Great stuff!

Quote from Fm1

But some experts say that the early reports included several biases. “I never took the original studies at their face value,” says Stephen Freedman, a professor of pediatrics at the University of Calgary in Alberta.

The only "early" serious report/study about long Covid has been made in Switzerland and did show that there is no such pathology. It's all about asking the proper questions. There may be damage from any virus. The Swiss study did show that children with/past Covid effectively had a little less severe symptoms than children without Covid...

So Long-Covid American style is a self induced mental illness.

May be soon we will have one "CoV-19 terror nation" less on the planet.

Japan looks to simplify COVID survey, deal with it like seasonal flu - The Mainichi

TOKYO (Kyodo) -- Japan is considering simplifying the way it deals with the coronavirus, sources close to the matter said Friday, potentially taking a

mainichi.jp

Downgrading CoV-19 to flu.

The moves also follow calls from medical and other experts in the government to downgrade the classification of the coronavirus to a level similar to seasonal flu and take a more flexible approach in the battle to stem the spread of the virus while balancing socioeconomic activities.

The German free mason/rotary (NAZI) press tries to fuel more corona awareness.

(S+) Biontech-Gründer Uğur Şahin: »Das Virus mutiert in hoher Geschwindigkeit weiter«

Mit Omikron hätten wir noch Glück gehabt, sagt Biontech-Chef Uğur Şahin. Er rechnet damit, dass der neue Booster Anfang September ausgeliefert werden kann –…

www.spiegel.de

Sahin is the top criminal leader of Biotec a company that until 2019 sold (< 700 in total) cancer gene tech chemo therapies. He was ask (by JF mafia / Pfizer) for a speed up project to develop something like Moderna worked on since 10 years.

The result is that about 2 billion shots of crap RNA so far had been injected into humans that did cripple/kill far more than corona ever will. FDA did fully approve that Biontec/Pfizer can contain up to 30% crap RNA of unknown structure !!!!!

So be aware that all these criminal fascists are still active and expect similar paid posts in US journals like Nytimes soon!

We fund a study to find out if kids can put a Q tip up their nose. Just insane the way research money is spent!!!

NIH-funded pediatric COVID-19 testing study finds school-aged children can self-swab

Child-collected nasal swab samples on par with swabs collected by health care workers.

NIH-funded pediatric COVID-19 testing study finds school-aged children can self-swab

Child-collected nasal swab samples on par with swabs collected by health care workers.

www.nih.gov

A new study that could have immediate implications for COVID-19 testing in schools found that with age-appropriate instructions, school-aged children can successfully use a nasal swab to obtain their own COVID-19 test specimen. The study provides data to support recommendations regarding self-swabbing that can be implemented by schools and in other settings where children undergo COVID-19 testing.

new corona like virus outbreak in China?

China: Fachleute melden Ausbruch von Corona-ähnlichem Virus

Internationale Fachleute bestätigen den Ausbruch eines neuartigen Virus in China. Der Erreger ist dem Coronavirus ähnlich, allerdings ist eine Übertragung von…

www.derstandard.at

Quote from gerold.s

new corona like virus outbreak in China?

We already reported this. We have to expect more virus with the same spike as corona as both USA & China work on it. I guess that Covid just was a test run. Next time 30% of all people will be killed. So keep antiviral drugs ready!

Japan COVID: 1,725,696 Cases and 18,331 Deaths - Worldometer

www.worldometers.info

It is interesting to see that not only in Japan statistics claim that Omicron is far more deadly that the deadliest alpha version of corona.

In Switzerland we currently report about 2 deaths/ day with/from corona. Age > 60 most age > 80. With the same case number most countries report 4..5x more deaths what just tells us that they willfully cheat the data. E.g. UK that counts everybody with a positive test during the prior 60 days. Compared this to US states....

Other countries like Oman/India report more or less 0 deaths from Omicron since months despite doing more tests as e.g. UK. The fact is: Omicron is not deadly but if you are already sick it can kill you like a flu. Also the heat wave in south/far east makes some contribution.

Why do all far east countries, prior to vaccination, have about 4x less deaths from a serious virus than now from the most mild one? Omicron CFR is around 0.01.

So most countries over report deaths by about at least 5..10x. Also we can clearly say that "vaccines" show a highly negative effect and many vaccine deaths are simply counted as Cov-19 deaths.

Conclusion. Most CoV-19 statistics are simply fake and manipulated to justify the ongoing sale of long time deadly therapies. So go on monitoring the few country statistics that exactly document the excess mortality.

Deaths registered weekly in England and Wales, provisional - Office for National Statistics

Mortality monitoring (MOMO)

The FSO's mortality monitoring system is designed to detect whether the weekly number of deaths is higher than expected at that time of year. Mortality rates…

www.experimental.bfs.admin.ch

Blood Damage Explains Many Harmful Impacts of COVID "Vaccines

Blood Damage Explains Many Harmful Impacts of COVID "Vaccines"

WARNING: If you have had a COVID vaccine/booster shot what this article presents may cause you stress and anxiety. Two key recent medical research articles,…

www.trialsitenews.com

WARNING: If you have had a COVID vaccine/booster shot what this article presents may cause you stress and anxiety.

Two key recent medical research articles, one from Italy and one from Germany, are used to document what may be the most important research finding during the entire COVID pandemic period.

Blood damage that has been detailed through sophisticated research methods is the "missing link" to explain many negative health conditions ranging from heart problems, cancers, reduced immunity and death. Blood damage is the key biologic explanation for harmful vaccine impacts. Note that I am using the word “vaccine” but fully recognize that COVID vaccines/boosters are not real vaccines, but a form of genetic treatment that, unlike real vaccines, do not actually and truly prevent or cure COVID.

As to deaths, data from Europe, New Zealand, Australia and Canada on total excess mortality country wide in 2022 that are greater than in 2020 and 2021 are best explained by widespread COVID vaccine use in 2022 and not COVID infection deaths.

Please understand that ordinary blood testing you may get from your physician laboratory orders are not the same as the research techniques used to document vaccine induced blood damage. Do not let cognitive dissonance stand in the way of your acceptance of these frightening research results.

In both research publications you must closely examine the many photographs given to prove blood damage; it is infeasible to reproduce them here. It will take time and patience to closely read these two studies. But there is no alternative if you truly want to understand how blood damage has been proven in a compelling way.

Italian study

The title is Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic PersonsAfter Anti-COVIDmRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.

Here is the abstract:

The use of dark-field microscopic analysis of fresh peripheral blood on a slide was once widespread in medicine, allowing a first and immediate assessment of the state of health of the corpuscular components of the blood. In the present study we analyzed with a dark-field optical microscope the peripheral blood drop from 1,006 symptomatic subjects after inoculation with an mRNA injection (Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna), starting from March 2021. There were 948 subjects (94%of the total sample) whose bloodshowed aggregation of erythrocytes and the presence of particles of various shapes and sizes of unclear origin one month after the mRNA inoculation.In 12 subjects,blood was examined with the same method before vaccination, showing a perfectly normal hematological distribution. The alterations found after the inoculation of the mRNA injections further reinforce the suspicion that the modifications were due to the so-called “vaccines”themselves. We report 4 clinical cases, chosen as representative of the entire case series. Further studies are needed to define the exact nature of the particles found in the blood and to identify possible solutions to the problems they are evidently causing.

Here are just a few statements from the conclusions:

With the hematological pictureswe have presented hereit is reasonableto expect reactivation of oncological diseasealong with blood circulation disorders.

The alterations found after the injection of our patient/cases withmRNA materials (whatever may be in them), we found what we believe is conclusive evidence that the modifications observed, as these persons wentfrom normal blood profiles to very abnormal ones,must be attributed to the proximate mRNA injections.

In conclusion, such abrupt changesas we have documentedin the peripheral bloodprofileof 948 patients havenever been observed after inoculation by any vaccines in the past according to our clinical experience. The sudden transition, usually at the time of a second mRNA injection,from a state of perfect normalcy to a pathological one, with accompanying hemolysis, visible packing and stacking of red blood cells in conjunction with the formation of gigantic conglomerateforeign structures, some of them appearing as graphene-family super-structures,is unprecedented. Such phenomena have never been seen before after any “vaccination”of the past. In our collective experience,and in our shared professional opinion, the large quantity of particles in the blood of mRNA injection recipients is incompatible with normal blood flow especially at the level of the capillaries. [That last statement is consistent with the reseach that has found evidence of micro blood clots found after vaccination and in long covid victims.]

German study

The title is German Researchers Examine Covid “Vaccines” and Vaccinated People’s Blood and Say Stop Vaccinations. It is available on this site. An abstract and a link to the report can be found on Dr. Ana Maria Mihalcea’s Substack HERE (English).

“The German Working Group for Covid-19 Vaccine Analysis has made its ‘Summary of Preliminary Findings’ publicly available. In a wide-ranging report dated 6 July, the Group described the toxic substances found in all Covid-19 “vaccine” samples analysed and the marked changes seen in blood samples taken from vaccinated people. The Group also found that the greater the stability of the envelope of lipid nanoparticles, the more frequent the vaccine side effects.”

“In order to avert a direct and imminent danger to human life and public safety, we ask that the Covid-19 vaccination programmes be discontinued immediately,” the Group’s report stated.”

The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analysing the contents and the effects of the novel Covid-19 “vaccines.” The group is an internationally networked working group with a core team of more than 60 doctors, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, mathematicians, alternative health practitioners, lawyers and journalists.

This summary is a preliminary, continuously evolving presentation of our research and findings on the so-called Covid-19 vaccines, as well as the effects we found on the human body and the blood in particular. The summary is intended for the public interest and to encourage further scientific discussion.

The comparison of blood samples from unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals by means of dark-field microscopy showed noticeable changes in the blood of each person who had been vaccinated with the Covid-19 vaccines. This was evident even if those people hadn’t at that point displayed any visible reaction to the vaccinations. Complex structures similar to those in the vaccines were found in the blood samples of the vaccinated. Using artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis, the difference between the blood of vaccinated and unvaccinated people was confirmed.

Using a small sample of live blood analyses from both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, they determined that artificial intelligence (AI) can distinguish with 100% reliability between the blood of the vaccinated and the unvaccinated. This indicates that the Covid-19 vaccines can effect long-term changes in the composition of the blood of the person vaccinated without that person being aware of these changes.

Crystalline formations were found in all of the blood samples taken from vaccinated people. “We are continuing to analyse these formations,” the authors noted. The Group also observed rouleaux formations of red blood cells in all vaccinated samples and “frequently observed an unusually rapid disintegration of the different types of cells in the vaccinated blood.”

The stability of the lipid nanoparticle envelope is closely correlated with the incidence of vaccine side effects and injury. The more stable this envelope, the greater the amount of mRNA that penetrates cells, where the production of spike proteins then takes place. These results correspond with the findings of pathologists who have carried out autopsies on people who died due to vaccine injury. Spike proteins were detected in damaged tissue. Researchers suspect that the spike protein is, in itself, toxic.

The following predominantly metallic elements were unexpectedly detected in the doses from AstraZeneca, BioNTech/Pfizer and Moderna:

• Alkali metals: caesium (Cs), potassium (K),

• Alkaline earth metals: calcium (Ca), barium (Ba),

• transition metals: cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), chromium (Cr), titanium (Ti),

• Rare earth metals: cerium (Ce), gadolinium (Gd),

• Mining group/metal: aluminium (Al),

• Carbon group: silicon (Si) (partly support material/slide),

• Oxygen group: sulphur (S)

Conclusion

The blood damage caused by COVID “vaccines” is best seen by the public as the key “missing link” that can explain what I and many others have been reporting on for many moths. Namely, the multitude of adverse health impacts and deaths from what the medical and public health establishment, the mainstream media and government agencies are still pushing on the public. Eventually, history will show that all the powers forcing COVID “vaccines” on the public do not have the courage and integrity to admit that the “vaccines” were a dangerous and false pandemic solution that ultimately will explain millions of deaths. They can be seen as part of the biowar forced upon humanity - a true crime against humanity. And the principal force that created the phony vaccine movement was Fauci, for home prosecution as a criminal is sorely needed.

View of Dark -Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna

Alarming New Report from Working Group of Vaccine Analysis in Germany and Other Countries

Vaccines Must Be Stopped Immediately!

anamihalceamdphd.substack.com

UK: Excess mortality goes further up. >18% now :: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep…al/weekending19august2022

US live expectancy down to 76 years from 79. The comment claims Covid is major cause.

US life expectancy falls to lowest level since 1996

The two-year decline is the steepest seen in a century and was mostly fuelled by Covid-19.

www.bbc.com

USA has some 332 Million one million died from CoV19 within 2 years. So this impact must be smaller that 0.3%....

But all side effects of the US Covid-19 terror regime did obviously kill 10x more people than corona.

COVID-19 and Osteoporosis: Shared Mechanisms and Crosstalk via Vitamin D

Abstract

Recently accumulated evidence implicates a close association of vitamin D (VitD) insufficiency to the incidence and clinical manifestations of the COVID-19 caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-COV-2). Populations with insufficient VitD including patients with osteoporosis are more susceptible to SARS-COV-2 infection and patients with COVID-19 worsened or developed osteoporosis. It is currently unknown, however, whether osteoporosis and COVID-19 are linked by VitD insufficiency. In this study, 42 common targets for VitD on both COVID-19 and osteoporosis were identified among a total of 243 VitD targets. Further bioinformatic analysis revealed 8 core targets (EGFR, AR, ESR1, MAPK8, MDM2, EZH2, ERBB2 and MAPT) in the VitD-COVID-19-osteoporosis network. These targets are involved in the ErbB and MAPK signaling pathways critical for lung fibrosis, bone structural integrity, and cytokines through a crosstalk between COVID-19 and osteoporosis via the VitD-mediated conventional immune and osteoimmune mechanisms. Molecular docking confirmed that VitD binds tightly to the predicted targets. These findings support that VitD may target common signaling pathways in the integrated network of lung fibrosis and bone structural integrity as well as the immune systems. Therefore, VitD may serve as a preventive and therapeutic agent for both COVID-19 and osteoporosis

Whatever happened to the new no-patent COVID vaccine touted as a global game changer?

NPR Cookie Consent and Choices

The vaccine's inventors were hoping it would help address questions of vaccine equity for countries that can't afford to make or buy expensive vaccines like the ones sold by Pfizer and Moderna.

A Texas team comes up with a COVID vaccine that could be a global game changer

It appears their strategy is working. Since Corbevax was authorized for use last December, Indian health authorities have administered quite a few doses. Here's where things stood on August 10 when I spoke with the two scientists who invented it: Peter Hotez and Maria Elena Botazzi, co-directors of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children's Hospital.

"The new numbers as of this week from the Indian government say that 70 million doses have gone into arms," Hotez says. Those arms belong to adolescents, but on August 10 the vaccine was authorized for use as a booster in people 18 and older.

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects

Background We have previously demonstrated that ivermectin used as prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), irrespective of the regularity, in a…

www.cureus.com

Abstract

Background

We have previously demonstrated that ivermectin used as prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), irrespective of the regularity, in a strictly controlled citywide program in Southern Brazil (Itajaí, Brazil), was associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality rates. In this study, our objective was to determine if the regular use of ivermectin impacted the level of protection from COVID-19 and related outcomes, reinforcing the efficacy of ivermectin through the demonstration of a dose-response effect.

Methods

This exploratory analysis of a prospective observational study involved a program that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days, for 150 days. Regularity definitions were as follows: regular users had 180 mg or more of ivermectin and irregular users had up to 60 mg, in total, throughout the program. Comparisons were made between non-users (subjects who did not use ivermectin), and regular and irregular users after multivariate adjustments. The full city database was used to calculate and compare COVID-19 infection and the risk of dying from COVID-19. The COVID-19 database was used and propensity score matching (PSM) was employed for hospitalization and mortality rates.

Results

Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users. The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users (RR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.49-1.05; p = 0.099). Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users (RR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.35; p = 0.0008) and 84% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.71; p = 0.016), while irregular users had a 37% lower mortality rate reduction than non-users (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; p = 0.049). Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.57; p = 0.006), and 72% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.07-1.18; p = 0.083), while irregular users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76; p = 0.001).

Conclusion

Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.