What possible relevance could that have?!?
I am sure that Covid cut a swathe thru the elderly professionals in Mumbai..Maharastra etc
https://www.tribuneindia.com/n…bjee-dies-of-covid-246296
the fact that the WHO ignored the public evidence from FLCCC BIRD etc on ivermectin
and tweeted Merck
was a shock to the Indian bar..
https://indianbarassociation.i…Chief-Scientist-WHO-1.pdf
harassing does not = airing a grievance
threat of legal action to harass scientific advisors
Rothwellian rhetoric..
maybe you should take the bar to absurd court for 'harassment' of the WHO"
we are no longer in Kansas .. we are in Georgia 
That's absurd.
Its happening... you need to read the notice 51 pages fully..
https://indianbarassociation.i…Chief-Scientist-WHO-1.pdf
I am sure that plenty of lawyers in the bar association have personal deadly experience with Covid
The WHO chief scientist actually withdrew the MERCKy tweet after the Indian Bar went after her
"
2. That, you have tweeted the following on May 10, 2021 on Twitter:
“Safety and efficacy are important when using any drug for a new
indication. @WHO recommends against the use of Ivermectin for
#COVID19 except within clinical trials https: //t.co/dSbDiW5tCW
I don;t remember Mizuno mentioning Samarium,---so not a replication but an analogue
experiment.
Correct..Mizuno didn't use samarium..in R20 and I don't think it is in the patent..
but Ramarao et al used Pd/Ni until12/20 and got xs heat.. (replication) after that they found that
putting same Sm on the mesh together with Pd gave more xs heat (variation)
India .. the land of the free..
the Indian Bar Association serves legal notice to the WHO
"
61. That, you and WHO have misled and misguided all the people throughout the pandemic,
starting from the delay in raising alarm soon after SARS-CoV2 was detected in China,
your failure to prevail over China in conducting an impartial investigation into the origins of the virus,
inordinate time consumed before
declaring Remdesivir, Hydroxychloroquine, convalescent plasma as ‘ineffective’
in treatment of COVID-19,
ever changing theories around SARS-CoV2 being
transmitted through droplets or it being air borne and many more.
The world is gradually waking up to your absurd, arbitrary and fallacious approach in presenting
concocted facts as ‘scientific approach’.
As the famous quote of Abraham Lincoln goes –
“You can fool all the people some of the time and some of the
people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”
This (pressurised electrolysis) would be a new field.
The hot/dry Mizuno R20 reactor uses low pressure H2/D2 in the millibar range
temperatures of 300 C are achieved with a wet watery electrolysis at a high pressure of ~90 bar..
wet electrolysis severely limits the temperature/pressure flexiblity..
here is an 11 bar pressure vessel
The spike protein is a focused target of COVID-19, a pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2.
quote from Daszak 2016 about Wuhan Gain of function research,,
"“Then when you get a sequence of a virus, and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS. We found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them. Some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequenced the spike protein: the protein that attaches to cells. Then we. . .Well I didn’t do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work. You create pseudo particles; you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, see if they bind to human cells. At each step of this, you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. . .You end up with a small number of viruses that really do look like killers.”
But I would suggest they give up on 'wet' systems and look at the hot and dry kind
Wet chemistry F&P replication is limited to a temperature of ~100C
as with Michael Staker 2019.. Figure 22
https://www.researchgate.net/p…ter-Nuclear-Science-2.pdf
Good results for "dry/hot" from among others
Iwamura
Takahashi
Mizuno
Celani
and now Ramarao(replicating Mizuno)
operating in a much higher temperature range..with indications of higher COP.
the experimental setup for " hot/dry"
appears to be simpler and the gas concentration of D2/H2
can be controlled much better than in electrochemistry.
This was a completely independent replication.
Good work with limited budget at Bangalore
Interesting that both H2 and D2 have similar xs heat results
Also that the extra blower input 11 W increases the xs heat by 20-35 W.
Also that samarium is added..to the Pd/Ni
It looks like Sm increased the xs heat production.
comparing the earlier(9/20) graph with 18/12/20
Takahashi...
"nano metal hydrogen energy is hard radiation-free, ie .. biologically safe.."
MHE may catch on ..
The epidemiological evidence in the World Health Organization’s origins mission report
Following the report.. the WHO commented
"“As far as WHO is concerned, all hypotheses remain on the table. This report is a very important beginning, but it is not the end. We have not yet found the source of the virus, and we must continue to follow the science and leave no stone unturned as we do,”
"https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/eu-affairs/162938/who-report-on-origin-of-covid-19-leaves-all-options-on-the-table/
The option of "future collaborative studies to include more timely and comprehensive data sharing" with China(=CCCP) appears to be not on the table
so the lab origin hypothesis will be on the table for some time.
the Sorensen Dalgleish report from Oslo/London is still on the table
It states that the published research from China-WIV /North Carolina-Chapel Hill in four papers
2008, 2010 ,2015 ,2018 culminated in an engineered spike..in 2019
In 2008, Dr Zheng-Li Si and WIV colleagues successfully demonstrated technical capabilities to interchange RBD’s between bat SARS-like and human SARS viruses.
Building upon this, the 2010 work (Hou et al, ) perfected the ability to express receptors on human cells.
On these foundations, the central Gain of Function work that underpins the functionalities of
SARS-CoV-2 took place, carrying the WIV spike and plasmid materials to bond successfully to a human epithelial cell-line.
This work (2015 Menachery/Chapel Hil) produced a highly infectious chimeric virus optimised to the human upper
respiratory tract........
Gain of Function was pursued in both Wuhan and North Carolina for some years and never ceased.
https://www.minervanett.no/fil…EvidenceNoNaturalEvol.pdf
Stupidity.. hypocrisy.. ignorance.. lies..
from Leunig
From the Indian free press
Geneva-based Dr Soumya Swaminathan,
the WHO chief scientist
WHO chief scientist Dr Soumya quoted Merck as the authority on ivermectin..
but Merck has murky past with unclean hands as recently as 2016
when they tried to swindle Pharmasset out of 2.6 billion
IMHO Dr Soumya gets her hands dirty too
""Candor and honesty define the contours of the legal system.
When a company allows and supports its own attorney to violate these principles, it shares the consequences of those actions.
Here, Merck's patent attorney, responsible for prosecuting the patents-in-suit, was dishonest and duplicitous in his actions with Pharmasset, with Gilead and with this Court,
thus crossing the line to egregious misconduct.
Merck is guilty of unclean hands and forfeits its right to prosecute this action against Gilead."
also Tamil Nadu is now strongly heading down.
the last of the Indian states to come down..
but the long haul isn't over for many patients..like in Bangalore.. Karnakata
External Content
twitter.com
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
'WHO scientist in dock for opposing Ivermectin’s use for Covid-19 cure"
Not in dock yet , just at the paperwork stage and not reported in the mainstream.
"
A 51-page legal notice was served on Geneva-based Dr Soumya Swaminathan,
the WHO chief scientist by the Mumbai-based Indian Bar Association, a lawyers’ forum,
for opposing use of Ivermectin for treating Covid patients.
It has threatened to prosecute her “under sections 302, 304 (II), 88, 120 (B) and 34 and other provisions of IPC
and under Disaster Management Act, 2005, i
n the appropriate courts of law having jurisdiction for each death caused
due to your act of commission and omission.”
solving Mills deception.
self deception is difficult to solve from the outside when one has invested a life and a few millions in it against many odds
From the Nederlands
The lockstep psychosis
03:52
That we are holding back excellent first-line drugs, such as ivermectin,
just so that experimental injections can be given accelerated approved vaccine status.
04:02
That we're chit-chatting about "oh, the infections are declining,"
when of course that's what happened last year as well.
04:07
...as it does every year.
External Content
www.youtube.com
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
this kind of reaction is cold fusion
At any rate impacting TiDx with 10-25keV D is not LENR
The Lipinski 2013 experimental results for Li +P fusion
"
The maximum rate occurred with protons incident on the
target at an energy of about 500 eV,"
look a good deal colder than the Helis 10 keV results
but are still warm
However the yield from such collision experiments is low.
10 kev = 116,000,000 K(Boltzmann)
500 eV = 5,802000 K .
http://www.colby.edu/chemistry/PChem/Hartree.html
by collisons only...
some cold fusion might happen well below 1eV.. but there wouldn't be much
of course there are catalytic and orientative mechanisms proposed
but these don't tend to happen if the collisions are happening at speeds much greater than bullets.
https://journals.aps.org/prab/…ysRevAccelBeams.22.054503
S. Lipinski and H. Lipinski, Hydrogen-lithium fusion
device, Patent No. WO 2014/189799 A9, 2013.
the Coulomb Barrier
this is the conventional wisdom..since around 1936
there is some barrier obviously
that stops protons fusing willy nilly
but even in 2021 we still have no exact model of the proton
or of deuterium
all 'we '.. the collective conventional physicists have is the ability to 'exactly' calculate the ~24 Mev by
looking at mass difference.... which 'we' call "binding energy"
how and why fusion happens 'we' really don't know
a long talk but
this comment TM1.19 30 I believe to be true..
"I do think that there are people that are so convinced that vaccines are the answer to this
that mass vaccinations need to be achieved at any cost
and they perceive ivermectin as disruption
the greater public health goal
they are doing it with good intentions
the road to ....you know.. (Hell). 
robert godes doesnt watch rt..
but does watch LF
