Online
Wyttenbach Verified User
  • Male
  • from Switzerland
  • Member since Jan 15th 2016
  • Last Activity:
  • Portal

Posts by Wyttenbach

    From hydrogen to nickel-iron in stars (and in the Earth too) there is a synthesis of atomic nuclei, after iron - the separation of atoms and the explosion of a star, for example, in the form of a supernova explosion SN 1987a

    You make the wrong conclusions. There is always synthesis (A+D/H --> B) possible to gain net energy. Of course you can gain more energy after A+D-->B+D --> A + 4-He as we did find in our famous London reaction.

    (tragically, many reactors in the world that have been shut down due to "anti-nuclear insanity" could have operated safely for another 20 to 30 years).

    Tragically the steal enclosure in 1/3 of the Frech reactors did degrade due to neutron bombardment, Even more tragically the first generation (1970 brand) of the rotten Westinghouse design reactors using a self propelled emergency cooling pipe did fail due to teh same degeneration. The suppose cooling pipe inside the reactor simply broke during a quake its should have withstood...but this - withstanding a quake just holds for year 1 not for year 40 ....


    So fission reactors are are a brain dead solution of originally criminal military minds that wanted to get Pu for free!!!!!


    Of course you can find zones with no quake for 10'000 years in average but....

    You can also do it the same way as TEPCO. Not even install Hydrogen separators or even worse, conduct all security exercises on paper only. Then after 40 years they had to not that the air valve on ever.


    Did nobody tell you that Fukushima was 20x worse than Tschernobyl??? Why? All spend fuel of the past 40 years has been stored inside the building so that at the end about 20 nukes equivalent of radioactive waste exactly did blow out eastwards.


    If the wind would have turned 1 hour Japan would no longer exist at least or humans!

    In summary, in the context of nuclear fusion, tritium is consumed in the fusion process with deuterium to produce energy, and it is produced by neutron interaction with lithium. This dual role of tritium is a key aspect of sustaining a fusion reaction over time, making the D-T fusion cycle a prominent candidate for future fusion-based power generation.


    This image show the neutron cross section of 6-Li

    As you easily can see and we also know from its internal structure it is more than unlikely that 6-Li ever catches a 14MeV neutron 10-5 means that it must pass 1000m of deuterium to get adsorbed...

    you can buy D2O for a price and then convert it to D2 by electrolysis

    The Canadian state had a D2O reserves of several 10'000 tons... what did drive the prize to a low end.


    What was the solution to hinder cold fusion research????


    It's unbelievable but reality. Canada did simply give away the whole stock of D2O (99.8% purity)) for a deep underground,totally useless neutrino experiment that will bring zero = 0 progress to mankind.

    So you will now have to pay 1000$ for 1kg D2O instead of 40$ max what is its real value. Some freemason can buy a new yacht and a nice Caribbean island as they can cache in 960 extra $$$ for each kg they once bought from Canada...

    times S^{3}$,

    Sorry Bayak, mathematics has long time ago proven that we can only use fields with 2 degrees of freedom as the volume norm is not defined for higher spaces. So any mention of S3 is self deception.

    So from a basic mathematical point of view SM is bare nonsense. Do not even think about the drug-abuse induced renormalization..


    In CT math the internal tangent space of SO(4) can be given as (1:2)2. = (1:4) where always 2D are coupled and 1 is the dual= vector = action space. It is the same trick as the power harmonic oscillator with x=x'''' or y= x4.

    Do you remember the counter rotating moments? = 2D sub structures?

    A Lithium-7 nucleus and a proton come together under conditions of high temperature and pressure (as in a fusion reactor or stellar environment).

    As said the piloting work of Lipinisky did show tat the optimal energy for 7-Li-p fusion is 100eV this is still pretty hot but definitely not solar and not high energy plasma.

    Principally there is no Coulomb barrier as atoms are neutral. E.g. H*-H* can freely penetrate nuclear orbits like a neutron. What is needed is the stripping off, of the first 7-Li electron and a polarization of the spin-paired second electrons (S2) what may induce a H*-7Li bond that will collapse to 2 alphas. The main problem is that you need pure isotopes, what the US army currently still will not allow you to have...

    With mixed 6-Li/7-Li no polarization will happen at least not enough for a high COP.

    electricfusionsystems.co

    This is based on Lipinskis work that originally was based on WWII German work "stolen" by US military.


    The 7-Li-P reaction can be triggered by 50..100eV that are needed to strip off/polarize the paired inner electrons. key for efficiency is the forming of a highly momentum polarized surface of aligned 7-Li(+).


    Lipinskis failed to do it, as they ignored by modelling. Let's hope they really can get a sustainable COP > 3 process.