Posts by LeBob

Quote from Wyttenbach

Internal charge is neither positive nor negative its topological charge, It is proportional to the force needed to hold together the rotating EM mass. If we break nuclear flux then we get a left and a right winded part that we name positive or negative. As soon as people talk of an electron then the nature of the charge is given.

Pure Coulomb charge like actions only can be seen in the far field where the flux no longer couples. But keep in mind that the Coulomb force always is a first order approximation of a basic magnetic action.

So this is how pico-chemistry becomes a valid and clear middle ground between chemical and nuclear decay transmutations. A resonant island of stable bonds in a metal atom's (like Fe, Mn, Cu or Ni) depths for an H* or four.

Quote from Wyttenbach

The sum of charge is constant. Always when you separate an electron from a proton you get a "+" and a "-" so the sum must be "0".

Mills assumes a locked in photon generates charge. This only happens inside nuclei where charge conservation does not hold. But Mills uses it for electron orbit relations.

Wouldn't it be logically consistent to say there is one mechanism for generating charge either in the nuclei or electron orbit relations? When you get into this dense H hydride arena shouldn't some pseudo-nuclei like collective forces start to overlap with standard EM forces? I am not sure why charge conservation would stop at the nucleus where even neutrons are a charge-balanced particle that beta decay into protons, electrons/positrons and neutrinos in predictable energies. A photon is an oscillating wave both electric and magnetic.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Sorry nonsense is always nonsense. Charge conservation is basic physics and Mills violates it. Please read his book and try to argue why this "violation of charge conservation" is a good idea.

Researchgate is for science promotion. Only very few people joining a discussion have some elevated level and understand basic logic. I urge you to think about charge conservation and the basic 2D:1D (dual space) action principle of fundamental math.

This is already what most miss even if they once learned it for a test, but never did go to the last detail of the proofs. I did it during bachelor times.

I need a basic lesson in charge conservation, using as little jargon as possible.

Quote from Wyttenbach

There are hydrino energy like resonances as EM mass always goes into resonance with equal (harmonic) masses with equal topology. This does not prove Mills models. It only shows why some values he got from his model gave him a good approximation.

It's a typical case of wrong model right experiment with good results!

I will agree with previous statements by yourself and RobertBryant (quoting multiple sources) that these atoms are only stable energy wells when the end result is an H* pare, quartet or any manner of a stable strong deep EM bond. His and your models are based on the most standard predictable classical physics laws there are before quantum uncertainty became fashionable.

Quote from Wyttenbach

The space time structure of nuclear bonds is totally different from 3D,t space. What Mills uses is only an equivalence relation for energies but he is neglecting charge conservation.

So his Hydrino -model simply is nonsense.

Hydrinos and to an extent all valid dense H or H* postulations are about EM or at greatest core influence electroweak forces. Modelling of the electron, resonant and ionization energy is at the core of his theory and collective picoscale forces for this site's general topic. Nuclear binding forces could be four-dimensional or not... and it wouldn't prove or disprove Mills' semi-classical model of the atom. Your models which I find intriguing, (to be honest I don't fully comprehend, mostly because it may not be necessary to understand the energy that comes from low power reactions) if anything is increased detail, but not a disproof of the general claims of the theory.

Quote from Wyttenbach

There are no deep electron orbits. This is a silly extrapolation of long time refuted (Dirac) models that are not withstanding basic mathematical logic. All mass is EM mass and a bound electron is EM-flux. Rotating flux can have any speed >>c in reference to the classic 3D,t space as experiments do show.

But there is a limit based on the speed of light right? Electrons have mass (EM or otherwise) so unless they are capable of warping spacetime, (according to the laws of physics we know) Mills' conjector of the H* or any electron orbiting a nucleus having a minimal size is correct. Even if they are, the max speed is sub-light through standard spacetime.

Quote from Wyttenbach

One more article about side effects among woman and fertility.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/n…rriage-after-corona-shots

It's all about how many victims we allow for 80 Billion profits from vaccines.

(Pseudo-) Fact-checkers don't like these sites as they always have links to original data (here VERS database) that prove the facts.

But always read carefully and only the facts.

Display More

*sad concerned face* When people were saying that fertility could be affected they were laughed at as some of the worse conspiracy theorists.. up there with flat earthers. Any woman that is pregnant or plans to have children should avoid this until further notice it seems.

Quote from RobertBryant

with respect to ivermectin... frontline doctors such as Kory and Stone..use ivermectin in accordance with the Hippocratic oath..

and are disappointed at the stance of regulatory bodies such as the FDA.

'No idea'

If JR can read..as the keeper of the sacred LENR records..I presume he can..he can get some 'idea' here..

"Ivermectin is a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasite drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades to treat onchocerciasis “river blindness” and other parasitic diseases. It is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe, and has won the Nobel prize for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world. Our medical discovery of a rapidly growing published medical evidence base, demonstrating ivermectin’s unique and highly potent ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication and to suppress inflammation, prompted our team to use ivermectin for prevention and treatment in all stages of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not yet FDA-approved for the treatment of COVID-19, but on Jan 14, 2021, the NIH changed their recommendation for the use of ivermectin in COVID-19 from “against” to “neutral”."

Using sacred librarian skills JR can find the source..

Seek and he shall find...

Display More

Unfortunately, some authorities in my tiny region have said some less than true statements about ivermectin on national television. Said that it was dangerous and easy to overdose on, when it obviously is helping heal and relieve people. The current situation seems to be officially saying use at your own risk.

Quote from Peter

Hi Curbina and Fabrice,

Thanks for your comments.

I mistook Chemla for Chemia (wasn't wearing my glasses !)

It seems the Chemla effect has to do with ion size,

but since ions and atoms are 10-5 (100,000) x larger than nuclei

it seems odd that there should be an isotope effect based on that

understanding.So I think the effect is not fully undestood any more

than the Ranque or Mpemba effects.

Pete.

Display More

You don't have to touch the nucleus in order to influence it. I do not know why the focus is always on tritium and deuterium (because of fusion), trust that protium would do us well.

Are we sure it's standard helium being produced and do alpha-emitting elements persist in any segment of the process?

Quote from rubycarat

Robert Godes models his Brillouin Hot Tube technology with a Controlled Electron Capture process, but others have different models. The actual theory is still unknown.

I wouldn't say it's entirely unknown.

Transition and alkali metal salts/oxides are an important upcoming resource, not just for the colouring of ceramics but for fertilizers, practical single-atom catalysis and efficient energy-related doping.

Quote from Alan Smith

Price depends on purity. If I can get 3 9's (99.9%) purity the hydroxide has a good market value- better than $500/ton since it also has a 'green premium' being made from waste. Fie 9's (99.999%) purity is around $1-2000 per ton.

Top impurities (not in order) are Iron, vanadium, magnesium, silicon, copper, sodium.

The impurities have potential utilization too!

https://blogs.sciencemag.org/p…04/spike-protein-behavior

https://scitechdaily.com/covid…stem-on-a-cellular-level/

I do not claim to know all of the implications of these two articles, but I find it fascinating that there seems to be a cellular structure disruption effect just from the spike proteins along with lung based viral effects. A lesson in cellular/molecular interactions right now.

Pico chemistry along with short range weak affects explain quit a few of the variables used to justify this model though. This is predictive as well, the reasults have to fall within a range of known numbers to be accurate. This doesn't require a new model of the atom besides acknowledging H's condensing, bonding and penitrating qualities.

Quote from jhonpalmer

That is quality software development work.

Pardon, clarify, Thanks 😁? Bob Greenyer, others and myself have quoted research showing that stripping an atom of it's outer electrons will increase the likelihood of beta decay. Rays at 4keV per atom should get that job done.

I'm curious as to what are the testable differences between the SAM model, pico-chemistry and Randal Mills' classicalish orbitsphere model. There is a common thread though. Thanks for posting Sir Alan!

Quote from Wyttenbach

Cigaret smoke contains 10x more radioactivity than ambient. It's of the worst kind - Alpha - from Polonium that gets enriched in the Tabaco leaves as also Pd or Pt get enriched.

Most likely this is the main cause for lung cancer among smokers.

So the USA once had 200'000'000 small radioactivity labs...

Ahh, beta emitters are more interesting, because we make implanted pacemakers and the like with beta batteries. Simple stuff like isotopes of Carbon, Calcium and Potassium are beta emitters... take an edge off the fear of readers with tiny factoid. Life is what it is. Neutered with millimeters of material to thermal form, straight harvestable electrons comming out. That and nice metal core +H* electro-weak bonds that produces pure sweet sub-gamma EM effects. Titanium pico-compound formation can even be an agent of accelerating decay of other atoms or potenciating the reaction of denser metals.

Quote from sam12

LENR a manifestation of weak

Nuclearinteractions..

External Content youtu.be

Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.

Display all external content

Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

Weak and deep electromagnetic nuclear interactions. The moon of lightning, animated nighttime gleam, vapor's spark.

Quote from Max Nozin

Can it explain Papp engine's 'excess energy'?

Part of it.

Quote from LeBob

I'll leave this here and walk out 😁. Some electrical outputs apparently from vacuum.. understand trace isotopes can be affected by high energy EM fields and ionization. I remember someone claiming that the Papp engine was a zpe device, even though it includes water and unstable ionizing isotopes in one electrode. It's literally a decay fueled engine with noble working gas.

"The NGE was self contained ...Each piston was fired in order similar to a modern day combustion engine. The noble gas was not ignited, which makes sense, but simply excited with a high voltage spark (400kV range). The gas inside each piston was focused with coils surrounding each piston chamber. When hit with a high voltage spark the noble gas mixture which was pre-ionized with a radioactive electrode in each piston, expanded rapidly in the piston and produced a steam engine effect."

Just checked the patent, they did know, even the EM accelerated decay part is confirmed. Imagine if there were simpler gas composition and a common less radioactive unstable isotope. Some of them got cancer due to high energy rare isotopes used. Think, both multi-nuclei protium enabled fire and accelerated weaker beta emissions could fertilize each other.. God have mercy as we do better!

There are milder approaches!

Quote from Fm1

Study of Aggressive Covid-19 Strain in Brazil Suggests Limits of China Vaccine

As P.1 variant spreads, concerns arise over how effective existing vaccines might be against new strains of the coronavirus

https://www.wsj.com/amp/articl…china-vaccine-11615063295

SÃO PAULO—As an aggressive coronavirus strain from the Amazon ravages Brazil, a preliminary study has provided the first evidence that the country’s principal vaccine, China’s CoronaVac, might not be as effective against it.

The small-scale study, which has yet to be peer-reviewed, comes as doctors warn of a humanitarian catastrophe in Brazil over coming weeks, with surging deaths as the disease overwhelms hospitals across the country.

Display More

I think diet/lifestyle is a variable that isn't truly considered in the coronavirus and collective immune responses to infectious diseases in general. Including their ageing population as a factor.