I am sorry to say I think your paper is gibberish. There are many statements with no meaning. Here are some of my favorites.
"We can change the motion of matter in the only way - by the corresponding motion of matter."
Huh?
Was this a cut and paste error?
"The materiality of Cosmos lies in its motion, which is a non-mechanical process"
Huh?
From Wikipedia, Mechanics "is the area of physics concerned with the relationships between force, matter, and motion among physical objects." By definition, motion is mechanical. "Non-mechanical" means nothing in this context. Say what it is. Not what it isn't. It is like saying cars are non-candy.
"The baryon mass formation of Cosmos, which is its fundamental movement and mode of existence, occurs as a volumetric spherical convergence of matter from all directions in 3-dimensional space and 3dimensional time,"
Huh?
Three dimensional time? That's a new one. If you are going to make up something you might as well invent time cubes.
Display More
Dear !
Thank you for calling my ideas delusional and crazy. This means I'm on the right track, because only crazy ideas become true!
For example, in my paradigm, cold nuclear fusion is very easily explained: This is a universal process of non-mechanical movement of matter in the form of material-neutrino-energy induction. Electromagnetic induction is only part of this process of matter movement. At a fundamental level, our World is non-mechanical, and it is in principle impossible to explain and understand cold nuclear fusion using mechanical methods.
My answer is simple (everything is written in my article):
1) Look out the window. Take a break from everything. What's left? MOVEMENT OF MATTER! By movement I mean any change. In our World there is nothing static, at rest. Movement is an absolute property of our World, that is, it does not depend on anything. Consequently, we can influence this movement of matter only by the corresponding movement of matter. No, it’s more correct to say this: we can only direct the movement of matter along the direction we need. (by formal analogy, how we direct the water of a river along the channel we need)
2) The movement of matter at a fundamental level occurs only exclusively spherically as its birth and disappearance (convergence-divergence, drain-source) with the frequency of Planck time.
3) Three-dimensional volumetric time. We measure space in three directions. Where did you get the idea that Time moves only in one direction of this Space? But not all three?
In my theoretical studies, I have long been using a 6-dimensional system of dimensions (meter-second, 3 - space, 3 - time), originating from Maxwell, Brown and Bartini, because in this system of dimensions the true physical meaning of physical laws and physical quantities. For example, the dimension of an electric charge is the same as that of mass!
