Your entire argument will fall apart when the "customer" is revealed during the trial and he testifies that his manufacturing process requires a lot of heat and he got that heat from the E-Cat. Then what? How will you look? How will your reputation suffer? It is better to prove the fraud now before the trial. IH should help. Dewey will fund it.
I would love to be a fly on the wall when the jury talks about the fake customer. I'm sure it will start something like this..."Okay so let me get this straight, so the company that was used for Rossi's test was created and is headed up by Rossi's lawyer but is supposedly a shell company for some other company that in the UK that makes metal sponges?" Priceless..