muons have not been observed except with Holmlid semi-hot fusion experiments, which are indirect interpretations.
Holmlid asserts that muon will be found in all LENR reactions.
Why is their such a reluctance to test for muon emissions in an active LENR reactor? Is it because you all don't want to know, what you don't want to know?
A post from Jones Beene on vortex
QuoteDisplay MoreJones Beene Tue, 05 Apr 2016 07:31:32 -0700
From: Robert Dorr
Nicely done presentation. Well worth giving a look.
These are the same slides used by Ólafsson at the colloquium back in October
at SRI, reported here:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-[email protected]/msg105372.html
Here is the easy link to the slides
https://goo.gl/Zlenbp
However, even today – the majority of observers in LENR seems to gloss over
the main point – which is that although fusion can happen, the bulk of the
energy release is in the form of muons (aka meson chain) and is generally
lost to the reactor itself (since most of the energy ends up as neutrinos).
Even so, there is net gain. The implication is that if properly engineered,
the gain will be much higher.
In short, “something is accidentally created,” which causes seemingly
impossible nuclear reactions (nucleon disintegration) and that something is
UDH or UDD – ultra dense hydrogen. George Miley used to call it IRH or
inverted Rydberg hydrogen. Now it is simply call UDH or DDL (deep Dirac
level).
Ultra-dense hydrogen can be the source of all or part of Cold fusion LENR
related phenomena. Laser induced fusion in UDH is the most effective way to
see the results since it produces muons as the longest-lived species. This
is also known as the “meson chain reaction” and the lifetime is several
microseconds, so that most of the energy will be deposited as neutrinos many
meters away from the reactor – up to hundreds of meters.