Shane and I are happy to leave things as they are. Too many Rossi threads spoil the forum.
May I ask why a thread on the January 2011 demo would spoil the forum, while the thread on the Lugano report doesn't?
Shane and I are happy to leave things as they are. Too many Rossi threads spoil the forum.
May I ask why a thread on the January 2011 demo would spoil the forum, while the thread on the Lugano report doesn't?
May I ask why a thread on the January 2011 demo would spoil the forum, while the thread on the Lugano report doesn't?
You may.
Was it under pressure?
I was under the impression that it was claimed to be 0 bars gauge so there was no reduced back pressure. But some claimed it was under slight pressure.
The problem seems to be that the demos and trials where sorely under evaluated and poorly instrumented. It appears that they didn't really want a valid conclusion.
Was it a closed system or was the flow open to air?
On. Scilipoti (Camera dei Deputati) formal parliamentary question on Rossi Demo:
Interrogazione parlamentare sull'e-cat di Rossi
[...] So, please, tell me. How is it possible that, before the test, Levi said he thought the pump was delivering 12 kg/h, but in his document reported a flow rate equivalent to 17.5 kg/h? How is it possible if after the test he declared that "the pump was not touched and […] it was giving the same quantity of water during all the experiment"?
Because nobody expects the Inquisition...
@ Shane D.,
You may.
Alan Smith gave me the permission to ask the mods why a thread on the January 2011 demo would spoil the forum, while the thread on the Lugano report doesn't. Could you tell me the reason? Thanks in advance.
I said you could ask, but I never promised you would get an answer. To be honest, we (ShaneD and me) are not of the opinion that another Rossi thread adds value to the forum.
Axil, I much appreciate your comments on LENR nuclear reactions and nuclear science in general. I was hoping the LENR-forum would be about that sort of thing and not just about trying to prove Rossi is a fraud.
I think I read Rossi saying the SK was air cooled at present. If so, it would lend hope for a LENR gas turbine in the future. It is hard to imagine air cooking is enough with that energy density and there must be some very difficult material problems to contain it.
Rossi is already testing a gas turbine...
I can't copy and paste from Rossi blog using this tablet but in a reply to Gerard McEk on page 341 Rossi says "what we are testing is a gas turbine".
It is very unlike that an anonymous blogger would have access to the higher echelons of both those companies, so how do you know?
.... hahaha, and Your acting is more reliable, because You post by a real name ?
In my former company I had contact, which had contacts a.s.o. to the corresponding P&G people in charge of such things.
BUT for nestle (which may be logically predestined to BUY HEAT) I can almost say, that I know THE person in charge of such things.
Ascoli,
As an old friend, I owe you my explanation as to why Alan and I felt it better to keep you and Can's analysis of the old Rossi demos here. In addition to what Alan said, I ask you to take a look at all the various threads. Notice how many? LF is very active now, and adding another thread, especially a Rossi thread, would add to the clutter and probably get lost down the page in a few days anyways.
In my former company I had contact, which had contacts a.s.o. to the corresponding P&G people in charge of such things.
"Former company": so you didn't have the current contacts. Also, why would Nestle give competitive info to an outsider? Your original comment added nothing useful to the thread.
"Former company": so you didn't have the current contacts. Also, why would Nestle give competitive info to an outsider? Your original comment added nothing useful to the thread.
...
..
You can believe me, or You can dream on and believe Rossi... should we place bets on who will be right ?
should we place bets on who will be right ?
Gambling is not encouraged here. It's a bit silly really, an exercise in machismo and little more than that.
Due diligence would be simple, in fact I am staggered that previous investors with an interest in cold fusion (they know who they are) never obtained a gamma spectrum from Rossi's reactors, failure to do that is inexplicable.
A Florida State nuclear safety inspector visited Rossi's Doral facility, unannounced, during the 1-year test and found no evidence of ionizing radiation anywhere. He was allowed free access to all parts of the facility - on the Leonardo side as well as the JMP side.
- but there is (still) no reason to not deny what you wrote in parentheses, still no evidence that he has what he says he has
You say NO evidence. You simply ignore everything from Levi's tests through Parkhomov and beyond.
Adrian, you need to read carefully, since you got me wrong: I was talking about Rossi, not the others - he hasn't presented any single hard fact that "his LENR" works. I didn't deny the others have something.
Adrian, you need to read carefully, since you got me wrong: I was talking about Rossi, not the other
So was I. Early tests on the E-Cat , replications and of course Stockholm, which you say don't count.