'Rather fusion depend on states that create a dilation of time space.'
Apart from that it makes all calculations elegant and though experimentd is there any proof of dilation? Same for space curvature. Can physics based on nonsense produce anything sensible?
Why do you regard relativity as non-sense? Gravity does not have to be restricted to the scale of astrometry. That is just a bias. Yes, the theory is elegant. It provides a way to get energy to nuclear reactions via W particles. That has far reaching implications that extend outside the range of this forum to a galactic scale to the majority of energy and mass in the universe. But for this forum, it suggests that since relativity acts in one dimension, it must also cause alignment of nuclei (magnetic or electric depending on relative view point). It creates an expectation of an electroweak attraction to account for magnecules and for a cluster of magnecules. It proposes that when that cluster has sufficient mass and energy (which it collects via relativity), the cluster becomes a nano sized star. It proposes a shielding effect that allow a type of fusion that astrometry teaches only happens in very large stars. But, that is just a explanation.
The fact is based on commonly accepted tools, I was able to derive a state equation for fusion using mass balance, stoichiometry and the assumption of magnecules. Two cascades of fusion reaction steps were derived to support overall state equations. Those cascades provide a greater insight into "colder fusion". Miley has shown direct measurement of these dense (hydrogen- quasi-neutron) clusters in LENR. But my explanation goes further. The state equations show the nuclear activation of oxygen and fusion of hydrogen to oxygen. These cascades are a more energetic form of colder fusion than proton fusion to helium. Not withstanding that further interpretation of that same data suggests proton fusion to helium can happen.
The disappointing fact is that state equations don't explain what happens to the expected energy. Given that disappointment, I understand if you are more interested the various LENR efforts which currently do not have that disappointing expectation. I don't see the lack of heat production as a reason to end research. Rather, I have shown that there is a fuel produced by colder fusion. I expect one day to see the recovery of most of the energy from the fuel produced by colder fusion.