What is IDA?
Clearance Items
-
-
What is IDA?
wow! Great find Ahlfors ! I can only wonder who is behind this very recent new initiative. Solid State Nuclear Science is just another way to say Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. Too bad they are still trying to play nice bowing to QM.
-
Check out some globular nodules, maybe they came out of this solid-state nuclear fusion ....
-
What is IDA?
This is a joint project between member Matt Lilley and MIT staffers. The site is not yet open for registrations, but will be launched with a YT video 'any day now'.
-
This is a joint project between member Matt Lilley and MIT staffers. The site is not yet open for registrations, but will be launched with a YT video 'any day now'.
I knew it! I browsed it for a while and when watching the tools being used for the open science, I wondered If Matt was involved. Kudos to Matt for creating this very good looking place.
-
Another one:
"Heating source using hydrogen dissolved metal, small device of generating electric power having the heating source, and method of fabrication the heating source."
-
From a formal viewpoint, things keep repeating.
-
The above post moved from the Covid thread- interesting but not quite on topic. Also worth pointing out that Lowell Wood's attendance at Snowmass was almost 10 years ago. Things have moved on a little since then (I hope).
-
Absolutely off topic, but spray wild monkeys blindly with a virus strain has close resemblance with spray stratosphere blyndly with sulphur nanoparticles - a resemblance from the analysis of effects viewpoint, which in both cases is near ZERO.
-
Things have moved on a little since then (I hope) > not sure
-
-
I think that this is a strange statement from somebody not impressed by peer-reviewed papers on the pandemic (and related matters.) Safire are quite rightly interested in commercial credibility right now, and laying all of your cards on the table is often not a good idea when you are doing that. This direct quote from Monty Childs (via me) gives you some idea of the problems this causes.
I'm happy with most peer-reviewed papers on HCQ (not sure what you are referring to). If you are talking about vaccines, there aren't any papers doing true placebo testing - so that science doesn't exist! I'm all for science.
Which is why I suggest the Safire team not write off publication. - I'm not buying that disclosure of breakthrough experimental results would put their business model in jeopardy. It isn't the idea folks, it is building mindshare in the world and growing your team that is hard. Revealing they can create transmutations isn't a new finding anyway.
I am friends with chemists who work at major oil companies and they told me how many times a new publication jump started an entire new industry and investments into startups. Do the work my friends, build the industry and your business. It isn't a zero sum game.
-
I think that this is a strange statement from somebody not impressed by peer-reviewed papers on the pandemic (and related matters.)
If you are talking about vaccines, there aren't any papers doing true placebo testing - so that science doesn't exist!
More anti-vaxxer nonsense from Navid, that rather proves Alan's point above.
There are plenty of placebo-controlled vaccine trials
https://virologydownunder.com/…ontrolled-vaccine-trials/
-
There are plenty of placebo-controlled vaccine trialshttps://virologydownunder.com/…ontrolled-vaccine-trials/
This is obvious a fringe site so called positive conspiracy. Something you might like...
But I agree that it makes no sense to do a placebo study for vaccines. You can only compare two vaccines with no vaccine at all.
-
Wrong forum. Let's move this over. The design of all experiments is important (just like in Safire!) Placebo controlled trials" refer to the same level of testing that we put any drug through, which comes with qualifications - studied with a no-adjuvant placebo, studied in a large group to see effects, and studied for long enough to see those effects (years). If you test a vaccine for 45 days on a small group, you are basically just doing the equivalent of what they do in software critical-test set validation. It's wrong and immoral, and with we've learned in the last 5 years of immunology the urgency for true science is never greater. A good study is Mogensen 2017.
This is obvious a fringe site so called positive conspiracy. Something you might like...
But I agree that it makes no sense to do a placebo study for vaccines. You can only compare two vaccines with no vaccine at all.
-
A good study is Mogensen 2017.
Robert Kennedy Jr's favourite paper? Its only 'good' if you consider that 1057 participants is acceptable in an epidemiological study, and where only 406 people received the vaccine.
I wonder why Kennedy, and you by association, ignore a much larger study funded by the same people, with 805,000 participants, that shows no harmful effect from the DTP vaccine?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p…s/PMC5360569/#!po=80.7692
-
5 posts moved here for being off topic from the thread where they were posted.
-
Robert Kennedy Jr's favourite paper? Its only 'good' if you consider that 1057 participants is acceptable in an epidemiological study, and where only 406 people received the vaccine.
I wonder why Kennedy, and you by association, ignore a much larger study funded by the same people, with 805,000 participants, that shows no harmful effect from the DTP vaccine?
Please provide a proper link. The one you provided above reports an 5x mortality increase with DTP vaccine.
-
Cheers Mark, that's the paper I was criticising.
Try this one for the 805,000 participants: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16091572/
-
Cheers Mark, that's the paper I was criticising.
Try this one for the 805,000 participants: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16091572/
Big fail on your part. The study I posted shows vaccinated are less safe and the vaccine is not effective.
This paper about correlations of vaccines and infectious diseases is a side-show to the main fact. Are vaccines safe and effective?This paper is asking if unvaccinated people had the same non-target infectious disease correlates as vaccinated people. That's a separate question. The answer appears to be, no difference (except for one vaccine leading to one increase in respiratory illness)
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.