Display More@THH,
It is how I interpret Rossi's additional clarification to Frank.
Here is the controversial line in the paper:
"In the left in the figure there is two voltmeters that measure the mV of the current passing through the 1 Ohm brown resistance."
As with all things in life, and with language, multiple interpretations are possible. I know this frustrates many here, but such is life. Language is imperfect, and sometimes people write inelegantly, especially when writing in a language that isn't your native tongue.
I interpret both Rossi's clarification and the line in the paper to mean that the two voltmeters are measuring the mV across both the 1 Ohm resistor and the reactor. That is absurd you cry! But it is not. It is simply my interpretation based on the information that we have been provided so far. The "current passing through the 1 Ohm brown resistance" is the same as the current passing through the reactor. So when the author wrote that sentence, the probable intentional meaning is that the voltmeters are measuring the mV across the unit.
You don't, perhaps, understand that current and voltage are completely different? And he clearly describes measuring current via a series (current sense) resistance. That can only be done by measuring voltage across the resistance - as he says here he does.
I am concerned about your mental state given you persist in this error. It is however most illuminating for everyone else.