QuoteDisplay MoreJoshua Cude says:
February 27, 2013 at 5:54 pm
You have said Rossi has given “*far* more proof than any previous cold fusion researcher. […] That test is irrefutable by first principles.” Now, you’re hedging. If Rossi’s claims are incorrect, it follows from your statement that all previous claims are incorrect too.
Jed Rothwell says:
February 28, 2013 at 7:01 am
That is my opinion, but formal, peer-reviewed scientific proof is still lacking so we can’t be sure.
Typical exchange. See the rest of this in which Rothwell's name appears 83 times. Be sure to note comments by "Joshua Cude".
http://e-catworld.com/2017/10/…et-al/#comment-3593524116
So yes, "we can't be sure" at the same time you castigated people like me for calling him a crook and a con man and argued that "some" of his tests were very credible. In fact, you are still bleating for people to find something "technically in error" with one of Levi's tests which shows you don't get the issue. If someone is deceptive, it may not be possible to find the technical error because it is deceptively hidden and deliberately so.
It depends what time period you are looking at. For quite a while, Rothwell was almost exclusively supportive of Rossi. I suppose the Defkalion fiasco got him thinking. Finally.