ICCF21 Thread


  • https://www.iccf21.com/


    ICCF21 starts shortly, and this will be the thread to report on, and discuss any news -official/unofficial, rumors/gossip, that emerges.

    Very interesting line up. I particularly am interested in what Larry Forsley and Pam Mosier-Boss have to say about the NASA/GEC initiative. Also on the schedule is Miley, and his "UIUC IH LENR Lab" team, along with another UI researcher. Seems UI is a hot bed of LENR activism! Then there will be Sveinn Olaffson, Tanzella/SRI/BEC, and many more of importance.


    Looking forward for those attending to talk freely to others, along with us here, about what they hear, think, or whatever. Not just about the official presentation, but also what is said during the breaks. The good stuff. Certainly keeping it secret, has not done a darn bit of good in advancing LENR...so speak up. Please.


    Here is a good link to the abstracts: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp7…uUL0v3NrkY7BPYPKDA_a?dl=0

  • Forgot to mention the Safire Team will be there also. Great line-up, with the old guard joining the new IMO. Well, "new" in a relative way. Not many youngsters in LENR that I am aware of.


    Like I said, hopefully we get a lot of feedback from the attendees. At the least, with Abd being there we will get some good reporting, and plenty of commentary :) to go with it. Thought Alan was going to attend, but he is not. Maybe his lab is where the real action is?


    Anyone know if Ruby or anyone else who can be trusted to get the word out is going to be there ?

  • I wasn't given the visa in the USA... https://www.iccf21.com/detailed-agena

  • I wasn't given the visa in the USA... https://www.iccf21.com/detailed-agena


    May be you have a name that matches with a Putin friend... There was a child (2 years old ) they refused too, accusing it to be a terrorist. They didn't look at the parent names...


    This is a consequence of the US education system, which levels (OECD) the country (US average education) to be close to an African (development) nation..

  • factually world is getting better and better, but the lucky guys we are, are under control of salesmen of fear.

    Good struggle with your respectives brain damaged system.


    I and Gennady will sure follow reports by all present at ICCF21. Don't forget to report all blog entries about ICCF21 happening.

  • I live in Kazakhstan, a name of our president Nazarbayev Nursultan Abishevich! But he is Putin and Trump's friend, we don't want war! The policy dirty business, but suffers science. Instead of combining all efforts on search of new energy, we hide everything from each other. It will lead to death of all planet, oil of planet blood!

  • Abd Ul-Rahman Lomax is taking questions here:

    http://coldfusioncommunity.net/ask-iccf-21-questions-here/


    Quote

    I am taking questions for conference presenters on this page. You may request that a question be addressed to a specific speaker or presenter, and I will communicate the question and I will bring answers back to this blog. The Conference is shaping up to be a breakthrough event. There is far more major CMNS activity under way than is generally publicly announced.


    Comments below may be entered anonymously. All comments from someone who has not been approved before must be approved, so be patient, and I am very, very busy with the Conference there are hundreds of people to listen to and talk with. If a real email address is entered, it will not be published, and I will be able to communicate directly, and intend to follow up on everything, eventually.

  • Looks like we have some young blood showing up. This was the result of the ICCF/Lenria's first time offering of scholarship programs to the event. That is what Miley has been doing at the UIUC for a few years now, resulting in IH funding a lab team on campus. Good recruitment tool to ensure the research continues on.
    Hopefully we hear from some of these new up and comers. I can not help but think they will be impressed with the high level of science put on display at the conference.
    "Additionally, for the first time more than 25 graduate and undergraduate students and science teachers will attend the conference via a new scholarship program created to engage the next generation of capable scientists with fresh energy, ideas, and an interest in LENR."
  • Jean Paul Biberian is making a report on what happens at ICCF21




    Beside the unavoidable subjects, I found interesting there was an expert in metallurgy (Ashraf Imam)


    Here is the google translation of Day 0


    https://translate.google.com/t…our-0-de-iccf21-fort.html



    Sunday June 3rd day 0 of ICCF21 at Fort Collins Colorado

    Hello,


    The 21st ICCF Conference on Cold Fusion will be held in Fort Collins, Colorado from Monday, June 4th to Friday, June 8th. The organizers have scheduled a first day on Sunday, June 3 open to students and those interested to learn about the subject of cold fusion.

    This first meeting, as well as the conference, takes place at the Fort Collins University Campus. We are staying on site, and the place is absolutely remarkable, very modern, and extremely well maintained. I want to become a student here again ...


    David Nagel made the first presentation: "Introduction and Issues", He is one of the two co-organizers of the conference with Steve Katinsky. He retired from the Navy, and teaches at George Washington University. He explained the situation of the cold fusion in the world, what was still to develop, and said that the major industrialists were in the starting blocks, ready to invest. One of the future limitations for applications is the word cold fusion, or LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reaction) which contains the word nuclear and which may be a brake on public acceptance.


    Mike McKubre , recently retired from SRI, made his presentation on "Electrochemical loading to produce the Fleischmann and Pons Effect". He suggested to newcomers to read first of all what is already published on the subject, especially the work done in the early years. Martin Fleischmann and Melvin Miles exchanged a lot by mail, and these letters were recently published by Jed Rothwell (lenr.org). These letters provide plenty of information to understand how to achieve a successful cold fusion experiment. He then reviewed in detail his own work indicating the conditions leading to success.


    Jean-Paul Biberian , I exposed the results obtained by myself and other researchers on the "Gas Loading". I have shown that nickel of nanometric dimensions is of great interest. In particular, the nickel-nano and hydrogen pair give good results. During an ambient charging experiment of a Ni-Pd-ZrO2 powder, the temperature rose to nearly 400 ° C, and the energy produced was 47kJ much higher than a chemical process.


    Dennis Letts talked about "Calorimetry and Heat". He detailed the different types of calorimeters he used: isoperibolic and Seebeck.He also showed his results with the use of two lasers to excite the surface of the palladium electrode. The frequency beat of these two lasers produces a signal in the THz range, and by scanning this frequency, peaks corresponding to phonon frequencies appear. He also discussed his work with plasma dumps in deuterium in a Seebeck calorimeter. He thus obtained excesses of 5 to 7 Watts.


    Chino Srinavasan , exhibited the "Transmutations data". In some situations transmutations occur, especially with metals such as palladium, nickel and titanium charged with hydrogen or deuterium. He recalled the ancient works of George Miley and Mizuno who independently found similar transmutation products. He also recalled Georges Oshawa's experiments of electric arcs in water with carbon electrodes that produced iron. He also spoke about biological transmutations, and the recent conference on this subject that took place on May 18 in Korea.


    Ashraf Imam spoke about "Materials Challenges". He is a specialist in metallurgy, and has been able to explain in detail the different types of defects found in metals, and the source of these defects created during their development, as well as the way to eliminate them by treatments. thermal. He talked about the palladium - boron alloys he made that gave excellent results. The information he gave me that struck me, and that the nickel-hydrogen reaction is endothermic, that is to say that we need to provide energy for it to be realized. Which explains my own results where the hydrogen does not enter the nickel nano at room temperature, but comes back heating.


    Peter Hagelstein of MIT presented "Theoretical Considerations". He first recalled that there were hundreds of theoretical articles, but he was mainly interested in the initial work of Schwinger (1965 Nobel Prize in physics) and Préparata. He emphasized the coupling between energetic reaction and phonons. His recent experiments tend to prove that this coupling exists in both directions, that is to say, either transfer of the energy of a nuclear reaction in heat, or conversely passage of vibrations of the solid into gamma rays. He also explained that for him, gaps in the crystal lattice are needed for the deuterium atoms to fuse.


    Dana Seccombe addressed the marketing issues of cold fusion. He recalled the global energy challenges that can not be solved with renewable energies. He mentioned the qualities of the cold fusion, and compared them to other sources of energy currently available.It is clear that LENRs will be much better in many areas. He also compared the situation of LENRs to the semiconductor industry.


    The day ended with a reception of the participants.

  • The first photos on the Internet... https://twitter.com/ColdFusionNow


    Thank you Gennadly, and Ruby. Looks like the old guard is there in force. Very good sign to see Robert Duncan attending. He was on the Science Committee, but had not made the last ICCF, so I was crossing my fingers he would show. With the rumors floating around that his Texas Tech/Seashore Research is getting results, maybe we will hear something from him. That would be big news in LENR land.


    Plenty of others there in a position to report on every aspect of the conference. I see BG, Ruby is obviously there since she provided the photos, Jed Rothwell, and then of course Abd. My guess is that this will the best covered, and reported on of all ICCF's.

  • I asked Rob Duncan when we would be hearing the Texas Tech results, and it sounds like a few more months. Certainly not this week, unfortunately.


    bobeson,


    Thank you for that bit of information. Hard to believe he would be there at all, were his research so far a failure. Then there are the rumors, and Ahlfors investigative photojournalism that point towards something positive.


    If you are comfortable responding, can you give us your expectation...good or bad, based on your conversation?

  • I think it will be good, but he is holding his cards very close to his chest. He said that his sponsor wants the results to be very thorough, so they are following up on a bunch of aspects that complete the investigation. I was told by other attendees that they are planning to submit the results to a major mainstream journal, which would be great.

  • I think it will be good, but he is holding his cards very close to his chest. He said that his sponser wants the results to be very thorough, so they are following up on a bunch of aspects that complete the investigation. I was told by other attendees that they are planning to submit the results to a major mainstream journal, which would be great.


    Thank you so much for that! Just so the audience is informed; Duncan's rumored, and somewhat speculative "sponsor" is Bill Gates, to the tune of $6 million.


    My opinion only, but considering he is there in Fort Collins, and intending to publish in a major mainstream journal, well....sounds good.

  • Quote

    Hard to believe he would be there at all, were his research so far a failure.

    Well performed research is never a failure. Even if the results are negative or unwanted, they are still of value and should be reported at meetings and in the literature. This helps prevent other researchers from repeating errors and going down blind alleys. It may also give others insight and lead to new discoveries.


    I am often puzzled that Bill Gates support for LENR, if it exists, should be secret. Why? I am sure Mr. Gates can withstand criticism from mainline scientists, if that is the concern. And he already gets thousands of requests for his staff to screen so it can't be to avoid more LENR proposals. What's the current conspiracy theory that explains why Bill Gates would be secretive, had he decided to support Duncan or anyone else looking at LENR.

  • I've seen a slide from Michael McKubre about what should be done on LENR (and which says we are far).

    What I would like for people I exchange with is a diverse collection of "experimental plan" dedicated to industry and academic labs of various kind.

    When you met a small company in hightech, a local academic lab in a dynamic zone, working in domain like nanotech, accumulators, engines, nuclear science, renewable, I would like to send them a handful of proposal papers saying that

    "according to this old LENR experimenter" a good research plan could be "analyse this and that paper" then "try to reproduce this and that experiment" "then when it works experiment this and that new idea" to gather data and why not go to "the explanation".


    Personally I'm attracted by Ed Storms approach, thus to PdD wet cells then dry gas permeation once it works, using modern instruments like used in accumulator research and nanotech, but i'm not competent enough to gather the reference papers, guess which kind of corporate lab would be best, guess the costs and requirements.

    I know Storms approach is not well received by most, but when I real all critics on all theory, the conclusion is that there is no theory, no hope, no future. I suspect, from experimental results, this position is a bit exaggerated.

  • Ruby is making a report about Monday


    http://coldfusionnow.org/iccf-21-day-1-on-heat-and-theory/


    There is a paragraph about Tom Darden, talking of groupthink, that Jean-Paul did not cover

    David J. Nagel introduced keynote speaker Tom Darden at the 21st International Conference on Condensed Matter Nuclear Science. He spoke about “group-think” and urged scientists to keep open minds and reject conformity thinking, going through examples of “cultural group-think” in American society, and referenced the last US election. He wants to see the mainstream open up to scientific papers and he is seeking to engage the whole of science in this important field. “Humanity needs for us to succeed,” he ended.


    One quote that suprise me from Mike McKubre :

    Mike McKubre wrote:

    “At the same time, cold fusion is reproduced somewhere on the planet every day. Verification has already happened. But self-censorship is a problem in the CMNS field. Are we guarding our secrets for fear that someone else might take credit? Yes.”


    Interesting evocation of confirmed results in PdD/LiOD


    Mizuno results were presented by Jed Rothwell "He reported 20-40 Watts from a glow discharge set-up which uses air-flow calorimetry as other calorimetries interfered with the experiment. ".


    Miley have presented his results with nanoparticles (PdZrO2) over 6 month...


    Robert Duncan was there, and introduce Akito Takahashi presented work on some poweder (Pd Ni ZrO2)...

    Th result was reproduced at Tohoku (good!).


    Tastsumi Hioki observed nanoperticle work better with Ni than Pd.


    There was a theory session with Peter Hagelstein, Vladimir Vysotskii, Anthony Zuppero/Thomas Dolan, Norman Cook.


    Personally I wonder wether the Zuppero theory may be a missing link for Storms theory. "Taking two particles, each has a potential. At some point when they are a particular distance, they begin to couple, and an “big” electron is ejected out of the system leaving the reactant in a low-energy state. "... maybe .

  • That Gates signature was superimposed above the mostly redacted real signature, to see if it was a clear match. It does look close, but hard for me to agree it is confirmed.


    It’s not ‘comfirmed’ (ie by Duncan), but it is clearly Gates’ sig...


    a) He’s interested in LENR

    b) All the visible parts match exactly

    c) Not everyone has 5 Large going spare, especially to donate to a university

    d) Only someone ‘famous’ would want to keep their participation secret, for obvious reasons.


    Speaking of which...


    Quote

    I am often puzzled that Bill Gates support for LENR, if it exists, should be secret. Why?... What's the current conspiracy theory that explains why Bill Gates would be secretive...

    :sleeping:


    Perhaps because he is (three-times) banned from Texas Tech - so needs to lamely obscure his identity in order to troll them some more?

  • There was a theory session with Peter Hagelstein, Vladimir Vysotskii, Anthony Zuppero/Thomas Dolan, Norman Cook.

    Are you stating above that Norman Cook is attending? I hope someone asks him about his thoughts on Rossi! Norman Cook is no longer mentioned by Rossi at all.

  • Jean Paul Biberian have made a new report of Day 1, like Ruby did :


    Here is the google translation

    https://translate.google.com/t…-journee-iccf21-fort.html



    Monday, June 4: 1st day ICCF21 Fort Collins Colorado



    This first day began with an introduction by David Nagel, who put this conference back in relation to the previous 20 conferences. ICCF21 is in the middle of previous conferences with 173 participants.


    Tom Darden : Creator of Industrial Heat recalled that he had come three years ago to the Padua conference. He explained that he was doing what he was doing, that is, supporting the Cold Fusion because of the consequences of the LENRs which should in particular not create pollution. For 6 years they have been helping laboratories to achieve a reproducible experience by traditional laboratories.


    Michael McKubre , retired from SRI did a "Technical Perspective". He recalled that he had worked three years with Martin Fleischmann in Southampton after his thesis. It was because he knew him that from the beginning he started cold fusion, especially since he was already working on deuterium in palladium. He made a reminder of what he knew:

    • Deuterium loading by measuring the resistance of the electrode,
    • The measurement of tritium and helium-3
    • The measurement of helium-4

    He explained that he can not measure everything at the same time during an experiment, so choices must be made. He explained that there were 5 actions: Verification - Correlation - Replication - Demonstration - Use. For him, since 1992 the proof of the reality of the cold fusion had been made in particular by Mel Miles who had shown the correlation between heat and helium production.


    Dennis Letts and Dennis Cravens , "Building and testing at high temperature Seebeck calorimeter". They showed the details of their air-cooled Seebeck calorimeter in which they discharge with 500 volts and 200mA under a pressure of 10 Torr deuterium. They regularly obtained heat excesses of 5 watts. In their experiment, they use an anode of molybdenum and as cathode a deposit of 7um of palladium on the inside of the tube. The time constant of the calorimeter is 2h 30.


    Mizuno ,: "Glow discharge experiments". The presentation was made by Jed Rothwell because Mizuno did not come. In his experience, he made plasma discharges to deposit nickel and palladium. It measures the heat produced with cooling with a flow of air. He has placed in his calorimeter two identical reactors, one of which is blank. In the first experiments, he obtained a COP of 2. With a new method, he has only 10 to 30 Watts of excess heat.


    George Miley : "Progress in Cluste Enabled LENR". His work is financially supported by Industrial Heat. He continued on the track he had opened by doing multi-layer Ni-Pd. He thinks that defects are created because of the stress between two materials. For this he worked with a Pd-ZrO2 system manufactured by "arc melting" and then reduced to powder by "ball milling". All experiments with Pd-ZrO2 produced heat excesses. They experimented at room temperature loading and unloading deuterium into the powder. There is more heat charging than unloading. They also added inside the CR39 cell to detect the production of neutrons, and indeed they were observed. In the future, they will work at higher temperatures.


    Takahashi : "Research Status of Nano-Metal Hydrogen Energy" This presentation is the first of three presentations that are the results of a collaboration between Nissan, Technova and four universities under the NEDO. The experiments were made with Pd-Ni-ZrO2 and Ni-Cu-ZrO2 alloys. He recalled his theory that supposes that 4 deuterium merge simultaneously in a tetrahedral structure. In a calorimeter operating with an oil cooling. They introduce hydrogen or deuterium at a pressure of 1 to 10 atmospheres. The experiments range from ambient to 500 ° C.The excess heat observed is of the order of 5 Watts with 100g of powder. Differential Calorimetry measurements show that there is an optimum around 400 ° C. They also noticed that the excess heat increases after a re-oxidation of the powder made by melt spinning and followed by a first oxidation.


    Iwamura : "Anomalous Heat Effects Induced by Metal Nanocomposites and Hydrogen Gas". This project is part of the NEDO from October 2015 to October 2017. The best results are 8 Watts. They noticed that the system only works with alloys. The Pd-ZrO2 system does not work.One way of understanding is to think that for there to be excess heat, there must be gaps in the metal. This happens when there is an interface that produces stress and therefore gaps. With palladium alone, there are no constraints, so heat to at least 800 ° C to create these gaps. They also observed heat burst correlated with pressure increase.


    Hioki ; "XRD and XAFS Analysis for Metal Nanocomposites Used in Anomalous Heat Effect Experiments". 16 collaborative experiments were performed with the same materials as those described by the other two authors. He then spoke of mesoporous zeolite type materials in which palladium nano grains are introduced. They obtained an excess of 10 Watts for 45 days.


    Peter Hagelstein : "Phonon Mediated Excitation Transfer Nuclear Involving Excitation". He picked up on what he said the day before by showing that collimated X-rays can be produced.


    Vladimir Vysotskii : "Using the Method of Coherent Correlated States for Realization of Nuclear Interaction of Slow Particles with Crystals and Molecules". He showed that LENR-type reactions occur through an effect of correlated states that lower the Coulomb barrier.


    Zuppero and Dolan : "Electron Quasiparticle Catalysis of Nuclear Reactions". They showed that in some chemical reactions an electron is emitted with the energy of the reaction. This idea was developed for LENR type reactions. According to them, they manage to explain all the observations.


    Norman Cook : "The Renaissance in Nuclear PhysicsLENR and Transmutations". He developed the problem of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle that does not apply in the kernel. He criticized the Copenhagen school for interpreting this principle of uncertainty.