One reason we need our highly qualified sceptics to sort out the BS from the possible, rare, advance in science or technology
We can read many useless crap on YouTube about let say string theory or dark matter, which are already obsolete and disproved by experiments. Their authors were well payed not only with YouTube impressions, but also from public grants dedicated to serious research etc. So that the income of scammers at YouTube is the least problem for me. Not to say, that flooding of fakes slows down the acceptation of real findings in the same way, like fringe ignorant objections of pathoskeptics and ignorance of pathoskeptics is actually quite ineffective for spreading of free energy crap at YouTube.
But there is way bigger problem in the fact, that widespread ignorance of breaktrough findings spread by ignorant pathoskeptic slows down their acceptation and progress in times of global energetic and environmental crisis, where just this type of findings is urgently, desperately needed. And such a damage is way more devastating for human society as a whole, than lost of informational monopoly for pathoskeptics on YouTube
So in brief, the crusade of pathoskeptics is not only ineffective against spreading of real crap - but it is also highly damaging for honest inventors and researchers and human society as a whole. We don't need these "highly qualified skeptics" for anything.