The church of SM physics

  • Here's a little something more about light interacting with light.


    "groups of three photons interacting and, in effect, sticking together to form a completely new kind of photonic matter"


    "the researchers found that the bound photons actually acquired a fraction of an electron’s mass. These newly weighed-down light particles were also relatively sluggish, traveling about 100,000 times slower than normal noninteracting photons"


    Here's the article:

    http://news.mit.edu/2018/physi…reate-new-form-light-0215


    and the corresponding paper


    https://www.rle.mit.edu/eapg/w…_3_Photon_bound_state.pdf

  • Mills says that two oppositely circular polarized photons (w/ at least 511keV) superimpose to strike a proton. This results - in his theory - for a volume of space creating the "transition state orbitosphere" where matter and energy are indistinguishable -- space is ringing at its resonant frequency -- interestingly the TSO is made a R= 1/alpha *a0 (bohr radius) . This goes on to make a free electron and positron.


    Thus, via the proton collision the linear momentum of the photons is conserved. What do you make of this? Do you have evidence that matter is not involved?


    And you say that photons interfere with themeselves, but what do you make of Mills argument that "photons cannot be created or destroyed by superimposing. If this were true, it would be possible to cool a room with illumination. Constructive and deconstructive interference violatest the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics."

    I liked your comment but I'm not sure what a transition orbit sphere is. Haven't heard this concept elaborated.

  • That sounds like an incomplete gamma-gamma pair production. If the interacting photons were traveling 100,000 times slower, it sounds as if they're looping somehow. Maybe moving in a helical fashion.


    I don't know if you know, but if you slow down a photon to a little less than c, some of the photon energy is exhibited as effective mass. Then if you slow it down to zero by making it loop round a closed path, all of the photon energy is exhibited as effective mass. This is the photon in the mirror-box thing as described in https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06478. A mirror-box containing a photon is harder to get moving than a mirror box containing no photon, because you have to change the photon's path. I think the wave nature of matter plus things like pair production and annihilation and electron spin make it clear that the electron is a 511keV photon in a box of it's own making, and mass is just resistance to change-in-motion for a wave in a closed path.

  • That sounds like an incomplete gamma-gamma pair production. If the interacting photons were traveling 100,000 times slower, it sounds as if they're looping somehow. Maybe moving in a helical fashion.


    I don't know if you know, but if you slow down a photon to a little less than c, some of the photon energy is exhibited as effective mass. Then if you slow it down to zero by making it loop round a closed path, all of the photon energy is exhibited as effective mass. This is the photon in the mirror-box thing as described in https://arxiv.org/abs/1508.06478. A mirror-box containing a photon is harder to get moving than a mirror box containing no photon, because you have to change the photon's path. I think the wave nature of matter plus things like pair production and annihilation and electron spin make it clear that the electron is a 511keV photon in a box of it's own making, and mass is just resistance to change-in-motion for a wave in a closed path.

    This makes sense. In the models where an atom has structure and isn't composed of probability clouds of points (even if just for engineering and applied technology) how does this work. An electron orbitsphere or toroidal feild as a more accurate possible representation would work with these same principles?!

  • This makes sense. In the models where an atom has structure and isn't composed of probability clouds of points (even if just for engineering and applied technology) how does this work. An electron orbitsphere or toroidal feild as a more accurate possible representation would work with these same principles?!

    An electron is an electromagnetic wave in a closed path which sits around a proton to form a hydrogen atom. Think of the electron as something like a hula hoop of light. It goes around the proton, but it isn't some speck that goes around it like a planet round the sun. And it isn't stiff. If it interacts with an incident photon some or all of the photon is kind of sliced off and becomes part of the electron, which is then no longer symmetrical. So it moves. But it's still wrapped around the proton, so the orbital changes. I tried to describe the electron here. To make an electron you "wrap" a 511keV photon into a double-loop trivial-knot configuration where the minimum and maximum field variation combine, along with all points between, to form a spin ½ standing-wave "spinor" with a standing field:


    strip5electronSpinor.pngStrip images by me, GNUFDL spinor image by Slawkb, see Wikipedia


    Only the electron isn't a flat strip. Inflate the strip to a twisted torus then inflate that to a spindle sphere torus to get the right geometry. Only then you have to remember that the the spindle-sphere torus is something like the eye of the storm. It's the central portion of the electron, that's all. There is no billiard-ball thing in the middle that has a field. The electron is field.



    ...HornTorusFlipHorizontal.gif

    SpindleTorusFlipHorizontal.gif
    s-orbital4.jpg

    Gifs courtesy of Adrian Rossiter’s torus animations, S-orbital image from the 2010 Encyclopaedia Britannica
  • Much thanks! Resonant energy transfers, shrinking hydrogen orbits, shrunken hydrogen orbiting inside certain metals and such are possible. If only this was what is in standard textbooks.

  • Thanks Bob. Amazingly, this sort of stuff goes back nearly two hundred years. I wrote something about it in an article called A worble embracing itself. It starts like this:


    See the 2014 essay on the fluid dynamics of James Clerk Maxwell by Henry Keith Moffat. He referred to Maxwell’s 1867 letter to Peter Guthrie Tait. That’s where Maxwell said the simplest indivisible whorl “is either two embracing worbles or a worble embracing itself”. A worble embracing itself has a ring to it. I think it’s one of the secrets of the universe myself. Because John Williamson and Martin van der Mark were talking about something similar in their 1997 paper Is the electron a photon with toroidal topology?

    toroid2-e1574010834148.jpg
    Toroidal electron image by John Williamson and Martin van der Mark
  • Wyttenbach just posted an update...


    The proton, electron structure, its resonances and fusion products (NPP2.2)

    The absolutely exact e-p orbit model for 4-He and 3-He did reveal some astonishing facts. 4-He can be formed from protons only. The charge structure of Kaon,Pion has been found and also the exact energy - wave equivalents needed to split a proton into K+,Ko are now known. This gives Holmlids work of UDH fusion producing Kaons,Pions strong theoretical support.
    We also related the structure of SO(4) physics to SM structures and show why SM did fail. Mainly because it is based on 1.2% of the proton mass only!
    We did also enhance the explanation for the 5 rotation based charge coupling and show a simple proof how and why the containment of magnetic flux works.

    Read more

    The proton and its resonances NPP2.2.pdf


  • Wyttenbachjust posted an update...

    The proton, electron structure, its resonances and fusion products (NPP2.2)

    : Three years ago the author started a ground zero search for the basic laws of nature

    that are responsible for the formation of dense nuclear mass.


    The motivation behind this task was the fact that form 90 years physics has failed in explaining the fundamental relations

    between masses and other first order
    quantities like magnetic moment, charge and magnetic radius.

    The belief that mass and its structure can be understood at high energies only has led to a model[1]

    that looks like a stamp collection,

    that is of contemplative value only


    At least Dimitri Mendeleev's stamp collection was based on masses..in 1869

    The Standard Model in 2020 fails to explain masses..or be based on mass..

  • "Understanding what the electron might actually be is probably key to understanding all of physics. You have been taught to think of electrons as having no components or substructure but that is nonsense. You should also separate the idea of the electron and its charge: the two concepts are related – very much so, of course – but not quite the same. The difference has to do with the two different radii of the electron. Let us start the discussion with that. "



    https://ideez.org/matter/

  • The absolutely exact e-p orbit model for 4-He and 3-He did reveal some astonishing facts. 4-He can be formed from protons only.


    Since about six months SO(4) physics just uses electrons and protons to model all mass - including the neutron of course. This allows to use exact orbits with well known energy levels and perturbations (couplings).


    The astonishing outcome of the new 4-He model was that it did exactly show that all internal excess energy waves of two neutrons are disposed off. This is the first theoretical verification of Holmlids work as he also produces 4-He during the Proton split to Kaon Pion starting from UDH!


    This also answers the last open basic question: What is the exact nature of the strong force quantum? Its the sum of reorganization steps of all the 4 Hydrogen (p-e) orbits that looks exactly like the mirror of forming 2 neutrons together with changing the rotation structure from 3 to 4 full rotations for all flux.


    This is a milestone of physics as it will definitively help to understand why the alpha particle is a basic building block of all higher Z (charge number) matter.


    On the other side the newest version contains some references and examples why exactly the standard model fails. Mainly because all knowledge is based on 1.2% of the protons mass only...


    I'm looking forward to interesting times in physics, that will face a separate corona like shock.

  • Another novel theory..on vixra.

    From Belgium... JeanPaul

    "The mass, radius, and magnetic moment of protons and electrons"

    "

    This model further builds on older ring current and/or Zitterbewegung models for an electron

    and, hence, we will also highlight those results when relevant."

    https://vixra.org/pdf/2001.0685v8.pdf


    The ring currents resemble those of some other new ,non SM theories..

    Jean Paul has problems explaining the sqrt2 factor, .. perhaps he needs a new dimension


    Jean has 54 papers on Vixra..since 2017.. .lots of reading..

    this is from one of them.

    "As a young man, looking at study options, I once had a discussion with an engineer – and, yes, it was a

    discussion on quantum physics, the stuff that has fascinated me all of my life, and will continue to do so

    .
    He was a smart, cultured and sophisticated man. He told me he and most, if not all, of his fellow
    students had been attracted by the same, but they all ended going through the motions only when
    studying quantum physics: they would regurgitate the models and equations, and know how to solve
    the standard problems, but then forget about it as soon as possible.


    I will never forget his intuitive conclusion on the subject-matter: he told me he instinctively felt the wavefunction

    was like a ‘flat’object, so it couldn’t do the trick. What he meant to say was that, as a mathematical object, it has two
    degrees of freedom only: a ‘real’ and an ‘imaginary’ dimension – both of which are, obviously, equally
    real – or equally necessary in the description, I would say.

  • Today a German newspaper did remind us of the famous detection of the Quarks... At least two Nobels have been given for the this most fringe theory of physics that is not even able to give/measure a mass for these fantasy Quark particles.


    Quarks are resonances of the Proton perturbative mass that does 3 rotations in 4D space. This is exactly what SM (standard model) physics tells us but this perturbative mass is only 1.2% of the total proton mass.


    All theories based on these fringe (quark) claims just explain the kinetic coupling of the proton perturbative mass. These models e.g. LQCD reveal not a single grain of knowledge about how matter is structured, how the forces evolve and of course these models are unable to calculate any single base quantity of matter.


    Sad to know that we spent 50 Billions (CERN, SLAC etc...) without wages just for knowing how protons in the high energy regime do couple!


    The same happens to ITER now. Recent experiments do show that we will not be able to transport the fusion energy without destroying the stability of the plasma. We know this - watch the Mills video of self sustain or simply because in LENR or sono fusion the destruction of the NAE did stop most researchers.

  • Using your models it's possible to explain the origin of Newton's law (f=ma), the principal characteristic of the "dense matter" ?


    Gravitation, strong & weak force can be exactly given. But gravitation may be (very likely) not a constant as it couples via the electron perturbative mass that might slightly change. f=ma is a general formula and is always correct but f=m*g is nowhere on earth a constant force! Because the earth is not homogenous and not perfectly of spheric shape.

  • Another point of view...Stoyan Sarg.

    Physics_of_Cold_Fusion_With_the_BSM_SG_A.pdf



    ABSTRACT OF THE ESSAY:

    Advances in the field of cold fusion (LENR), in

    which the energy release cannot be explained by

    a chemical process, need a deeper understanding

    of the nuclear reactions and, more particularly,

    the possibility for overcoming the Coulomb

    barrier. The treatise “Basic Structures of Matter –

    Supergravitation Unified Theory”, permits an

    explanation from a new point of view by using

    the derived three-dimensional structures of the

    atomic nuclei. The recently published

    monograph “Structural Physics of Nuclear fusion

    with the BSM-SG atomic models” provides a

    new approach in theoretical understanding of the

    physical process and the possibility for

    modification of the Coulomb barrier. The

    monograph offers: (1) A method for analysis of

    the LENR experiments using the BSM-SG

    atomic models, (2) A selection of isotopes

    suitable for a more efficient energy yield with a

    minimum of radioactive products (3) practical

    considerations for selection of the technical

    method and the reaction environment.

    Keywords: cold fusion, LENR, Coulomb

    barrier, atomic nuclear structures, alpha decay

  • Thanks to Stoyan for reminding us of the Lambshift


    It would be nice if Stoyan or anybody could show

    the mathematical calculation according to their theory

    of the Lamb shifts.. for the isotopes H1.... Li7


    The current H1 lambshift cannot be accounted for by only QED


    according to Julian Krauth,.

    https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20722/1/Krauth_Julian.pdf






    According to Stoyan.. the changes from H to He and Li 6/7 are due to proton and neutron additions