Google (UBC/MIT/LBNL) post Nature updates.

  • So, It seems team google never really ceased to exist, was just looking for more funding. This is interesting. I wonder if they had submitted a proposal to the Arpa-e FOA.

    At the ICCF24 Panel Discussion, Trevithick said most of the team stayed involved. That tells us something about what they saw, but did not include in their Nature Paper.

  • External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    A recent video from Berlinguette's lab.

  • External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    A recent video from Berlinguette's lab.

    Electrochemically hydrogen loaded target, from where that crazy idea could come from? 😉

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Nice set-up the Berlinguette Group has. Like the name of the reactor also: "Thunderbird". As mentioned above, at ICCF24 Trevithick said most of the old Team Google are still working on LENR. This new video, and Schenkel's heading up the 2 ARPA-E Teams (LLBL/Univ of Cal-Davis) proves it.


    Makes you wonder what they saw during their 4 year TG (Project Charleston), they did not put in their Nature paper?

  • Nice set-up the Berlinguette Group has. Like the name of the reactor also: "Thunderbird". As mentioned above, at ICCF24 Trevithick said most of the old Team Google are still working on LENR. This new video, and Schenkel's heading up the 2 ARPA-E Teams (LLBL/Univ of Cal-Davis) proves it.


    Makes you wonder what they saw during their 4 year TG (Project Charleston), they did not put in their Nature paper?

    Philip Ball wrote a piece that had a few hints in it, though the details now escape me.