Frank Gordon's "Lattice Energy Converter (LEC)"...replicators workshop

  • Thanks Shane D. , it’s really good to know things are moving forward. I hope we finally get the repeatable and undeniable lab rat out of the LEC.


    Family first always! I know LENR is a fascinating mistress tho, guilty of that myself.

    I certainly Hope to see LENR helping humans to blossom, and I'm here to help it happen.

  • Here's something similar....

    https://spaceplace.nasa.gov/jupiter/en/

    What's It Like Inside Jupiter?

    It's really hot inside Jupiter! No one knows exactly how hot, but scientists think it could be about 43,000°F (24,000°C) near Jupiter's center, or core.


    An image of Jupiter, showing the great red storm.



    24 000 degrees inside a metal core loaded with hydrogen! If Alexander Georgievitch is right, it will make a lot of neutrinos, and a lot of neutrons by inverse beta-decay, so a lot of LENR!

  • Finally, everyone began to go out to the planet itself, to study the planets themselves will be more useful to us than these heaters... Cold nuclear fusion (ICCF) takes place at lower temperatures and pressures than in the accepted models of the planet Earth. The planet earth is "cold", the pressure and temperature are created by the earth's electricity, electrical discharges, as well as the friction of the rotation of the geospheres from the core, consisting of a plasma of XNC with a high content of iron oxide (Fe2O3), we can say the remains of a gas-dust nebula, from which the planets of the solar system and other systems are formed. Due to the rotation of the core, the friction of geospheres, plates, and geolitodynamic complexes (layers) occurs, creating electric charges in the earth's crust, which accumulate in the earth's electric capacitor (1 Farad) and at the same time it has the properties of the radiator of the planet Earth. And in the radiator, we know that the temperature is constant. This means that fluids (water, oil, gas) are radiator fluids (such as antifreeze) to remove heat from the friction of geospheres and cold nuclear fusion processes! And such a mechanism is the Wilson cycle in the theory of plate tectonics. The mechanism of fuel supply to the mantle and core is the process of subduction, where the CSF produces fluids that migrate up to the surface of the earth's crust. The drift of the continents in this case is associated with the mechanical process of rotation of the geospheres, which forms the dynamo effect of the planet Earth, and not convection in the mantle! There were articles by geophysicists, which indicate that the movement of geospheres with a depth of ten times higher than previously assumed. The temperature of the core and plasma should not exceed more than 6000C, because the organic matter above this temperature simply burned and this proves the organic origin of the oil. Water is formed due to the synthesis of inorganic chemical elements, which of course are more than organic matter and it turns out more. Due to electricity and cold nuclear fusion, all secondary minerals such as coal from oil, ores from aqueous solutions containing metals, diamonds are obtained from organic carbon, gold from lead, etc. My proposed theory of sliding plate tectonics fully explains all the processes in the earth's crust and confirms the theory of continental drift, which is much criticized in modern times.

    Нефть - это кровь планеты, надо сделать модель планеты и мы получим генератор Тарасенко, эта энергия покорит вселенную! :lenr:

  • I suppose you have seen the images of Ultima Thule sent by "New Horizons". The lack of craters is explained by planetologists by the fact that "there are not enough meteorites in the Kuiper belt". Yet logic would have the opposite: on the contrary, collisions must exponentially increase the number of cosmic debris, and at this distance from the sun, the radiation pressure is no longer strong enough to eject small particles and dust as it does in the asteroid belt.



    For me, on the contrary, the explanation for the absence of craters is different: a careful examination of the last images shows the trace of underlying craters, somewhat resembling the terrestrial “Large Scars”. (Hypothesis of my friend the independent geologist John Saul)

  • Yes, you are right: the surface is smooth! But a border of frost (probably nitrogen frost) underlines the layout of several underground craters. This can be explained since Ultima Thule is in an elliptical orbit: the layer below the surface is relatively cold, and the surface heats up under the effect of the sun as the body approaches the sun. (Which is the case now) Rocky areas have a higher thermal conductivity than dust, so the rocky area at the edge of large craters, close to the surface, diffuses solar heat faster towards inside. Above the rim of the crater, the regolith is therefore colder, and therefore nitrogen or methane does not sublime there, forming this ring of frost. We can clearly distinguish several rings on Ultima Thule, probably corresponding to as many buried craters.



    Archimedes was able to build the most beautiful theories with the help of a few simple observations, and by drawing figures in the sand, without the aid of any computer simulation. More modestly, the observation of the photographs of Ultima Thule allow us to deduce important facts: after having put forward the hypothesis detailed above, another question arises: where does the nitrogen that is deposited on the coldest parts of this celestial body, and above all, where does the dust come from that covers the craters and smoothes the surface of Ultima Thule like a cosmic make-up?

  • It must therefore be admitted that Ultima Thule still has geological activity, for example geysers: at regular intervals, these emit jets of gas and dust in the space. Some of the dust then falls on Ultima Thule, and the rest is lost in space. We must therefore ask ourselves the problem of the energy source that can supply geological activity on such a small body.




    But then another problem arises: Note the frost at the bottom of the craters, and also consider the frost collar at the junction of the two parts "Ultima" and "Thule". (I don't use the politically correct name "Arrokoth", I prefer U.TH.) This could be easily explained by saying that these parts are deeper, and therefore are more often in the shade. We observe this effect at the bottom of the lunar craters: the bottom of the craters is colder than the plains of Selene.



    But there is a problem: the axis of rotation of Ultima Thule pointed towards the probe, therefore towards the sun. (Ultima Thule "rolls" in its orbit, like Uranus.) The frost should have disappeared from the face exposed to the sun, and condense on the "hidden" face, to return 150 years later to the same place. This is not what you see on the visible side, and I don't know if NASA tilted the probe to take pictures of the “dark side” after the “flyby”. But I bet the other side isn't much different.



    Why that ? Because the shape of the frost deposits suggests that Ultima Thule's axis of rotation is not stable over time. If we consider this hypothesis, then it is normal for the nitrogen frost to condense on the most shaded parts, therefore the coldest, that is to say at the bottom of the craters and at the junction zone.



    It is therefore necessary to assume that "geysers" of gas and dust therefore produce from time to time random thrusts which gradually change the direction of the axis of rotation.



    This hypothesis also explains the meeting between Ultima and Thule. Indeed, we know that a satellite which orbits faster than the rotation time of its planet will lose energy and approach it, until it ends up hitting it. Tidal forces explain this transfer of energy. If the satellite orbits slower than the duration of the planet's rotation, the tidal ridge acts like a gravitational sling, spin after spin, and the satellite receives energy and gradually moves away from the planet. This is what happens with the Earth and the Moon: the Moon moves away and the Earth slows down. On the other hand, Phobos goes faster than the surface of Mars, and it will therefore disintegrate in the future as it approaches the planet, making a beautiful ring, like an aegis around the red planet.



    But two small bodies like Ultima and Thule were "gravity-locked" and therefore always faced each other, like Pluto and Charon. Such a torque is stable, unless it has satellites. This is the case of the Pluto / Charon couple, which should “quickly” eject its satellites, while slowing down. (From a gravitational point of view, the couple Pluto and Charon behaves like a single deformable body, and a “virtual tidal ridge” appears around the barycenter.)



    So the orbit of two small bodies facing each other is stable. Everything changes if one of the two bodies periodically ejects geysers of gas and dust: part of the ejecta falls, and part is ejected, and IT TAKES AWAY ENERGY. The two bodies come closer and they end up touching each other, but as they are gravity-locked, the contact is made at very low speed, without cataclysm, and we obtain a bilobed body like Ultima Thule or Tchouri.



    But the energy of the gas and dust jets of Tchouri is (probably) supplied by solar heat, this is not the case for Ultima and Thule: where does the internal energy come from? Scientists like us who believe in LENR are sure to see it as further proof of the existence of these controversial reactions.



    I am writing to you from a place near the Cassini family castle. The castle has disappeared, but the park's ice storage still remains. (I don't know the translation of "glacière" in english. Cooler? ) I took this picture of the “cooler”. It was a large masonry well, and inside it stood a wooden tower. The space between the millstone (pierre meulière) well and the wooden tower was filled with bales of straw. A stone vault covered the whole, and a small tumulus surmounted the vault. The whole formed a sort of giant "Dewar". During winter, Cassini's servants would cut up the ice from the nearby pond (it still exists, but at the time there was a small island with a ballroom built out of wood for dancing in the summer.) The ice cream could be kept until the middle of September and Cassini could give young Augustin Del Bosc and Cadet de Vaux delicious sorbets. It was thanks to him that they became scientists.


    Cassini is well forgotten in France, but I thank our American friends for naming the largest space probe ever launched with his name. This talk reminds me of the case of Methone, a surprising satellite of Saturn discovered by the Cassini probe. Methone is even stranger than Pluto, Ceres, Enceladus or Ultima Thule. You've probably never heard of it: Astronomers prefer not to see what they can't explain.


    It's a frozen ellipsoid barely 3.5x2.5 kilometers long. No crater, no visible fault : a beautiful cosmic Easter’s egg!



    Obviously, this fantastic moon was shaped by the hydrostatic balance as it melted, in the form of an ocean drop of salty water orbiting above the clouds of the giant planet. But what energy could have melted such an iceberg into space?



    On the other hand, if this body is made up of liquid water covered by an ice pack, the shape does not correspond to its distance from the planet Saturn. If we calculate its density, we find 0.3 kg / liter, which is impossible: there is no such light liquid. The official assumption is that it is an ellipsoid of "snowflakes" rolling over each other. This hypothesis seems incredible to me.



    I think it is a block of ice that retains the "fossil" shape of a time when it was a little closer to the giant planet. At one time, the rocky core of Methone released a sufficient quantity of thermal energy to melt the ocean (or rather the "salt lake", because "ocean" is a very big word for a celestial body which contains less water than Cornell's finger lake.)(Jed’s alma mater) Then the release of energy stopped, Methone froze in its ellipsoidal form, and the moon then moved away from the planet, keeping that "fossil" shape. The force that caused the moving of the moon was probably the release of saltwater geysers during the cooling. Water emitted at such a close distance from the planet will cause the moon to move away, the water falling on Saturn as snow. (The same principle as the Hawkins radiation, but with water vapour, it goes much faster than quantum pair generation…)


    When a future Kepler Aerospace space probe will take pictures of Methone up close, we will likely see fractures and fossil geysers on the tip of the egg facing the planet.



    This phenomenon of Methone migration and freezing took place recently enough that no impact would destroy the beautiful ellipsoidal symmetry. (A few million years at most)



    The question is: what source of energy was able to heat the solid core a few hundred meters wide, and why did the release of energy stop? Does this have anything to do with LENR? This is a question that would have pleased Arthur C. Clarke.



    You remember Swift described the two satellites of Mars long before they were discovered. As it turns out, French comic book writer Jean-Claude Forest had predicted a liquid satellite around Saturn. The story takes place in the distant future when Saturn radiates enough infrared so that the satellites are habitable by humans. I still have his comic book "Les Naufragés Du Temps" autographed by his hand in my library. I meet him at Angoulème Comic Con years ago when I was at High School.



    Is Saturn the planetary equivalent of a variable star? What if this planet started to radiate “something” from time to time? I have Alexander Parkhomov's book in front of me as I write to you. It's in Russian, I don't understand everything. But I'm obviously thinking about his hypothesis concerning neutrinos… (I absolutely have to order Bob Greenyer's translation on Amazon!)