The Design of Low Energy Nuclear Battery

Bon ou mauvais, il semble que vous décriviez :

New Energy Times - Issue #35 Special Report: Widom-Larsen Theory Simplified

Quote from Ryoji Furui

Dans mes messages précédents, il ya peut-être eu un terme qui aurait pu être interprété d'une manière qui n'était pas prévue. Je m'excuse d'avoir utilisé le terme incorrect « capture de protons ».

Pour clarifier, je voudrais utiliser un langage plus simple pour définir LENR et fournir une explication du cycle CN dans LENR, qui contourne certains processus ayant lieu dans le cycle CNO de fusion chaude.

Dans LENR, c'est en réalité la capture de neutrons qui se produit. Pour définir LENR, on peut dire qu'il implique deux réactions simultanées suite à la capture électronique. Un nouvel aspect important de ce processus est l'apparition d'une interaction faible lors de la capture de neutrons, qui entraîne la libération d'énergie du déficit de masse par l'émission d'électrons et d'antineutrinos (e&a). Il s'agit d'une extension du processus de fusion neutron-neutron décrit dans mon article.

Pour illustrer le processus LENR, permettez-moi de dessiner un cycle CN révisé. Au lieu de la voie normale impliquant le cycle CNO, LENR se déroule selon la séquence suivante :

12-C + n -> 13-C

13-C + n -> 14-N + e&a

14-N + n -> 15-N

15-N + n -> 12-C + 4-He + e&a

Display More

Well, i have explorated your website and your work attached. Now i won't speculate about potential links between gravitons in which you believes and Lenr.

So many, as wyttenbach, edo and some others could exchange with you on these topics.

Regarding to remain more close to the ground you should have a look also on all Halgelstein's work and W Dubinsko too.

Quote from Ryoji Furui

@Cydonia,

Thank you for sharing an article about the W-L theory. I was able to learn more about it, and the fact that the lack of gamma ray emission is key to explaining the LENR theory. After reading your article, I realized that my previous post may have been contradictory to Professor Li's model, which requires the concurrent capture of electrons and neutrons to avoid gamma radiation. It seems that my model is quite close to the W-L theory. Both of these reactions (12-C + n -> 13-C and 14-N + n -> 15-N) involve some form of mass deficit being emitted, typically in the form of gamma rays.

Unexpectedly, I arrive at a conclusion by recalling my gravitational paper, in which I wrote about the missing energy as below, (the paper available at http://ryoji.info/r424e.pdf on page 4)

"The existence of a repulsive field may account for missing energy observed in collision experiments. If the emission of a repulsive gravitational field can be observed directly in such experiments, it would also be detectable with laser interferometry, as the spacetime fabric consists of background noise with energy proportional to 1/f. What would be detected is the energy that has not been converted to kinetic energy of the massive particles generated by the collisions. If this field can account for all missing energy, then this would provide strong evidence that we no longer expect to uncover new fundamental physical properties of spacetime."

In high-energy fields such as those found in hot fusion or nuclear fission, missing energy is often recorded as gamma radiation. This is likely due to the chaotic nature of spacetime, which can produce high-energy electromagnetic waves. However, in low-energy fields such as LENR, missing energy is thought to be released as gravitons rather than gamma radiation. Therefore, it is possible that LENR does not emit high levels of gamma radiation, but instead releases energy as unobserved gravitons.

It took me over 20 years to complete my paper on gravitational research, and I have been away for a decade. However, today I was able to return to that work by considering LENR.

Display More

Quote from Ryoji Furui

W-L theory.

In physics a theory has some mathematical base. W-L is just a childish idea with no math. There are no known processes than can deliver neutrons in masses. W-L simple misinterpretes H* being a neutron.

Further: Only a few nuclei contain a real neutron structure. Neutrons are a product formed during forced nuclear decay.

The gravitational force between 2 proton is 10E-33 eV or simply never ever has any influence.

Quote from Ryoji Furui

When these particles fuse in a low-energy field, the resulting mass deficit is converted into gravitons

You did watch to many "star trek" episodes. Please do not use words (gravitons ) that make absolute no sense.

There is no mass deficit, just missing brain.

Gravitational waves have never been measured and there is no physical mechanism that could produce them. According electrodynamics a wave can only be produced if you accelerate charge what leads to dragging (delay in following) of the magnet field. Planetary mass cannot be accelerated the same way as charge and even more the mechanical binding forces limit it.

What LIGO identifies as gravitation wave is an EM wave from a kind of very big fusion event that ejects a gigantic number of electrons. The same we see from Pulsars where constant in streaming mass produces an EM signal from teh charge shock front.

Be also aware that there are only a few real particles and most what QCD claims are mind blowing fairy tales. So nobody ever will isolate a Graviton....For attaining this you would need at least ten bottles of Vodka.

Wyttenbach Gravitational waves have never been measured

Well, if their wavelength is so long that any human means could measure them.....

i don't believe in gravity particles but rather in gravity large fluctuations depending from where you are in the universe, why not ?

When you see how behave superclusters in the entire universe , we could postulate that.

Quote from Cydonia

gravity large fluctuations depending from where you are in the universe,

Gravity depends on mass - not on space curvature - a silly idea born for marketing reasons.

So of course gravity locally = close to massive stars can change dramatically. But the electric force from highly charged black holes is magnitudes larger.

Quote from Ryoji Furui

In general, one can consider that gravitons are quantum particles that represent the force exchanged between two objects. In my graviton model, it is calculated using an equation of special relativity, where the graviton is equivalent to the segment of gravitational field. When charged particles or neutrons scatter during nuclear reactions, they are pushed by gravitons that have been converted from binding energy.

You may find useful to know that Wyttenbach has not much love for the Standard Model, just so you know in which terrain you are stepping.

Quote from Ryoji Furui

In my graviton model,

I have begun to read your paper..

Does your gravity model have any calculation of the universal gravity constant G

based on known properties of basic particles such as protons and electrons

or any other fundamental constants such as "c"?

Quote from Ryoji Furui

I strongly believe that this research is crucial to addressing the global energy crisis

Many on this forum are here for that reason

Quote from Ryoji Furui

LENB.pdf

From your paper... there appear to be no theoretical calculation,,not even ballpark

the energy level of Thz radiation is something like 0.004 EV

It is difficult to see how this energy can interact with hydrogen to promote" p-p/CNO cycles"

which have energy releases of the order of 5-20 Mev,,

You write

"Since this experimental design for LENR is novel and lacks quantitative data analysis"

Best of luck with the data...

Hello, what kind of frequency/wavelength you have seen ?

Quote from Ryoji Furui

Recent observations of gravitational waves (GWs) have reported two types of frequencies.

Yes, this is what i expected , we are talking of very very low frequencies meaning very very long wavelength.

In this way we can understand the measurement difficulties.

Quote from Ryoji Furui

@Cydonia,

I plotted the GW data from the first several observations though I am not sure if they consist, but here,

https://www.ryoji.info/gwa.pdf

Background GWs are,

Display More