Online
Wyttenbach Verified User
  • Male
  • from Switzerland
  • Member since Jan 15th 2016
  • Last Activity:
  • Portal

Posts by Wyttenbach

    now the question is, Does anyone have any ideas as to what dose and rate to use it for prevention?

    Official US protocoll of today : https://covid19criticalcare.co…v8-2021-01-12-ENGLISH.pdf


    First a clearing with day1,2 full human dose then every 2 weeks once. This is the simplest way to administer it. Horse tablets contain usually 20mg/100kg. If you are bit heavier either you go down to 6 days or make a fine powder of the tablets.

    The problem is that the ivermectin is in the center of the horse tablet and not distributed homogeneously. (I did use a razor blade.) You can buy a bird version that is fluid and much more easily to "cut down" in smaller doses.

    She took only the two doses....would continued treatment return smell and taste faster.... who knows?

    Here we miss the exact information. But we know the virus can stay much longer than you feel healthy again. I would do 2-3 days clearing with standard dose anyway.


    FP98 masks! - but you no longer need it...

    A good summary: maybe if you're young and healthy but this type of vaccine would be a disaster if deployed for covid 19. Cell mediated immune response.

    You are quite right! ACE-2 is a receptor we need to support our live. Making a vaccine (Pfizer/Moderna) to target this receptor is a gamble with our future as the vaccine will also block our own messengers... For this purpose we have T-Cell responses that develop short time living anti bodies.

    So much about all idiotic experts (natural antibodies decrease... ui ui ) with real deep knowledge about increasing their check/Banc account balance.

    Negative and positive mass chase each other!

    negative mass has negative momentum (p = mV) .... Oh dear, is now the velocity negative or the mass ???


    Uncharged negative matter would repel itself gravitationally.

    Charged negative matter would attract itself strongly ... great gravity is stronger that em force!!!!


    How much crack did they take?

    Report: 1 in 8 Recovered COVID-19 Patients Die Within 5 Months

    https://www.medrxiv.org/conten…01.15.21249885v1.full.pdf


    Unluckily the study is a bit careless/superificial. We would like to know more detailed age groups not just <70>. Further the type of care in hospital is of prime interest but not given.

    In the diabetes cases it could also be, that many had it undetected before the hospital "visit". Also the medication most severe cases get is pretty experimental and could run them over the rim.

    But this reports shows that the overall treatment is disastrous when Ivermectin is ignored.

    Although it doesn’t cause more severe illness, it will lead to more hospitalizations and deaths just because it spreads much more easily, said the CDC, warning of “a new phase of exponential growth.”

    In the second wave we had 10x peak cases but not more hospitalization. These people are spreading fake news. The real problem is the lockdown and infected people staying home delivering high doses to their beloved. And of course the missing recommandation for FP98 mask!


    And worst: When will the bribe suckers at FDA/WHO recommed Ivermectin ??

    A good summary of what a vaccine should do:


    In vaccine design, it has been suggest that the makers of vaccines could keep up with viral evolution by continual alteration of the ‘payload’ - almost all vaccines in development use the spike sequence - to fit currently predominant strains. We suggest vaccines whose efficacies are largely dependent upon humoral responses to the S antigen only are inherently limited by the emergence of novel strains and dependent upon frequent re-design. In contrast, a vaccine that elicits a vigorous T-cell response that is far less subject to changes due to accruing mutations provides a better, more efficient approach to protection. The ideal vaccine would also deliver a second, conserved antigen such as the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, that very likely will elicit humoral and cell-mediated immune responses that will remain effective, even in the face of a rapidly changing virus.


    Obviously Pfizer, Moderna are far from being a pandemic vaccine. There purpose was to make money as fast as possible. Please use a classic vaccine if you need it. The next mutation will potentially make you as sick as the current one, despite a Pfizer, Moderna vaccine in your body did produce a high number of now "outaged antibodies".

    Facing lawsuits, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health withdrew the mandate that would have required all students under age 30 attending Massachusetts schools to get a flu vaccine by Feb. 28.

    To many Mengeles survived WWII and obviously produced mentally corrupt children.


    Promising vaccinated people a bonus just is a commercial for Eugenic something the USA did fight against in WWII...


    The perfect techniques about "how to cheat people" can be studied at Harvard.

    https://www.exed.hbs.edu/strategic-marketing-management/

    A court had to force a hospital/"the treating doctors" to continue Ivermectin treatment of a patient that after two days of intake could leave ICU.

    What do you think will happen next:


    - The hospital will fire the first doctor that prescribed it?

    - They will invent the story that all just lucky coincidence?

    - Big Pharma will stop any project at this hospital?

    - Rotary will hand over the revolver case to the responsible manager?


    I suggest the family should sue the hospital/doctors for the intermediate stop of the treatment and make them liable for later damage at least for the added physical pain/stress.

    Why the Pfizer/Moderna vaccine is only 33% effective after one dose and not 50 as promized:

    https://pledgetimes.com/how-we…he-biontech-vaccine-work/


    Clalit compared the proportion of positive corona tests among 200,000 vaccinated Israelis over the age of 60 with the positive test rate among 200,000 unvaccinated in the same age group. After two weeks, the infection rate among those vaccinated fell 33 percent compared to those who had not received the vaccination – even though the vaccinated participants only received the first dose of the Biontech / Pfizer vaccine.


    So this at best will end up at 60..70% for the old and vulnerable (That survive the vaccination... :sleeping: :) )

    https://www.urdupoint.com/en/w…aralysis-aft-1143428.html

    In addition to fatal cases, the media outlet reported about 96 life-threatening cases following COVID-19 vaccinations, as well as 24 permanent disabilities, 225 hospitalizations, and 1,388 emergency room visits.

    "While Moderna has named its four-member adjudication committee—all university-affiliated physicians—Pfizer’s protocol says three Pfizer employees did the work. Yes, Pfizer staff members."


    Unbelievable like the Boeing MAX issue... But if mafia controls mafia, then it must be so anyway. As also Professors usually are heavily sponsored by Big Pharma.


    Also the counting for CoV-19 deaths is clear: If you are old, have three comorbidity and one finds the CoV-19 virus when you did die within 30 days of CoV-19 then you are counted.

    But for vaccines the rules are reversed. If old people in Norway die short after the vaccination then they the are not counted as vaccination deaths... That's how children usually make the rules. I'm the big one --> the cake is mine. Oh the cake smells bad --> its yours.

    Thus, so far we have about 100 direct deaths (Today in total 30 from Norway!)after vaccination (30 days) - several 10'000 severe adverse effects and very good reason to believe that Pfizer is heavily cheating about the fabulous efficiency.

    We don't know whether vaccinated people can spread and how long they will spread the virus.

    I was not suggesting a physical barrier but that the vaccine provides a barrier to spreading in the population as the vaccinated portion increases,

    How should a respiratory illness vaccine do this ??? It will partially work for e.g. Hepatitis.

    I hope you are right on that 10 percent but based on data coming from UK it looks much more infectious.

    We had the same high infection rate as UK with the lame virus... Belgium, Czech republic were even higher!


    The worst thing you can do to spread the (death from) virus is a dilettante lock down. For this we have strong data evidence. E.g. children staying at home will face much more (2x in short time here) infections. All this with no fantasies about a faster virus...I did closely follow real live cases something what most experts did never do!

    Germany is the best example how you can maximize death from CoV-19!


    Thus take at least daily 2000 IU's VD-3 for some weeks, add zinc (50mg for two weeks then larger interval or smaller dose ). Get working drugs (Ivermectin,Sutherlandia,Nigella Sativa, -orange juice/ Hesperidin) to treat yourself as the hospitals very likely (50%) will kill you. And buy some FP98 masks that currently are the only chance to protect you from a high dose!

    The case was a 1-year-and 4-month-old male from Yunfu, Guangdong Province, China, who had exposure to domestic poultry prior to the onset of illness.

    Bird flu always has been a problem only for people that live in the same room as their chicken . Seen in Honkong where chicken were held in apartments... For the rest of us its a no brainer.

    The more contagious coronavirus variant discovered in Britain has now been detected in more than 50 countries

    You can make simple calculations how two competing virus with a 10% better fit will evolve. After 6 cycles the ratio is already about 4:1. There is never an exponential growth in cases. The only reason for exponential growth are super spreaders.

    The other scenario is a virus that produces 10% more load by a better replication/Escape function. In the first case more people will get mild infection, where as in the second case more people would get sick faster.


    From this it is easy to see that we see both behavior at work.

    Obviously state officials are intentionally lying or all did study at the high school for morons.

    See also: https://www.pulsetoday.co.uk/n…-still-pass-the-virus-on/

    83% protection after a CoV-19 infection. But hidden in the text: Infection protects as good as vaccines (fake claimend 95%). This is cheating style information orchestrated from top.

    The 83% were just a fudged figure based on a deliberately chosen test set for anti bodies with extremely low results that has been refuted by most other "real" tests.


    So state official do lie about faster virus that is according textbook 60% more contagious, where as in reality it is at best about 10%. They also intentionally lie about the protection you get from an infection (around 99.5%) that in fact is much better than any vaccination.

    The only thing they really worry is their buddies stock loss in Pfizer assets as the vaccine will no longer fully stop the South Africa strain. See also Fauci statement today!

    So the Lock downs are propagated to protect the income of big Pharma!

    If there were a lab leak—and, again, most experts do not believe that the available evidence points in this direction—then both the Wuhan Institute and its US partner would be on a short list of candidates to investigate.

    If you talk privately with experts then they say the exact opposite! The virus is of course lab-made.


    Why?


    The best viral match found so far is a no brainer 93% match. The virus has some more than 20'000 bases and if 7% do change then this means you need 1400 point mutations that happen once in two weeks in average. This is just the best case. The bad thing about this is that you must show (prove) the "whole" 1400 base changes chain and also the potential carriers of the chains.

    So this, the most natural pathway, is completely impossible as we know all wild bat virus so far.


    There is a rescue path known as pattern insert. Such an insert can happen e.g. when a cell is infected by two virus in parallel. It also can happen - less likely - if a chunk of the virus or host DNA is erroneously inserted.


    But here too there is a high hurdle. The AIDS virus homologous ACE-2 spike generating genes add-ons are distributed over the RNA and occur in 4 different locations. It is completely impossible that the same insert happened at 4 unrelated positions at the same time.

    So in the first case we would need at least 60 years of miraculous single mutations that all survived and replicated in the fastest possible time frame. In the second case a check-pot event would be needed that would need the invocation of a goodness...


    What else: We know the Wuhan Lab did the same trick some 10 years ago already with a flu virus. The only way out would be to test each animal in China for new, unknown virus and then try to explain by what mean e.g. a bat could fly 1000 miles to Wuhan. Or the modern Chinese excuse version - how a frozen Salomon could make it into a human nose....

    "We don't have any possibility of herd immunity without having high levels of vaccine coverage and nowhere in the world has had that happen yet."

    Typical no brain - unskilled - mafia leader. Respiratory illness never will have herd immunity you only can have herd protection. The best thing you can do is getting a mild infection if you have the treatment drugs ready!! The virus, as all simple corona virus, will stay for ever. (Just look at China) This is not SARS with badly fitting receptors and slow spreading. This virus potentially can fly miles and infect sensitive people far away. No indoor room is safe as Chinese studies did show. Currently only FP98 masks are recommend for going indoors!

    In fact the vaccination could - long time - make things much worse as these people will fall back into an unprotected state, what will not happen after a natural infection.

    - the magnetic field is a result of a movement of a charge

    - the magnetic field affects the moving charge by creating a force with the cross-product formula


    You tell now that the magnetic interaction doesn't need the charge at all but the interactions are between magnetic fields.

    Now the question is where does the required magnetic field for a magnetic flux based charge (e.g. electron) come from in this model?

    There are two pictures:

    - The macroscopic world according Maxwell - this needs only tiny extensions for interactions with dense mass.

    - Dense mass world cannot work with axioms = charge & "blubber mass".

    Magnetic flux is the only "stuff" that exists nothing else is needed to define physics. On the atomic level the magnetic moment is not generated by a ring current as in fact the field moves with "c" and the charge is at rest. This is given by the Faraday law. But the picture is completely symmetric of course, if you look at the magnetic moment only!