Should rename this as ‘The Idiot Thread’
You should ask Abd Lomax who started the
thread if he wants to change the name .
Should rename this as ‘The Idiot Thread’
You should ask Abd Lomax who started the
thread if he wants to change the name .
In my old Rossi days, I would have agreed with you Sam. Now, well... looks like he positioned himself to block Lewan's view. Right before doing so, he glances over at Lewan's face to make sure he is preoccupied. Could be wrong though.
If Rossi did not want Lewan to see him raise
the lid he had an opportunity when Lewan
left the test area.That happened just before Lewan came back and talked to Hurley about the test results.
Display MoreSam, it seems you have had a look at the famous Stockholm video.
What is, in your own personal view, the purpose of Mr. Hurley in this demo?
If you need asssitance, I can link you the full, entire 3 hours video without audio mute, just the full DPS...
in addtion, you could spent some time with rossilivecat, in your favourite browser, use CTRL-F (search) for "hurley" and read the comments by "hurley".
Warning, consumes a lot of CPU-time and RAM, but it is worth it!
In my opinion, Mr. Hurley is just another Mr. James A. Bass or an ERV (genious word invention, by the way!) aka Penon.
Some may call "Hurley" another sockpuppet...
What's your opinion about "Hurley"?
My opinion about Hurly is that he is good at Mathematics.If you watch the intermission
he might also be good with woman.
Director,
It is hard to keep a straight face when discussing Rossi. When I try to be serious, I can not help but think about Doral, and that Stockholm video of his positioning himself to block Lewan's view, then lifting the cover of the PSU and fiddling with switches. All the while with Fabiani blocking audience view on the other end of the table. Then I just lose it...sorry.
Rossi did not block Lewans view. Lewan was
talking to Hurley about the test calculations
Yes, I hope my opinion is clear. Rossi is a fraud and liar. There is a mountain of solid and sworn evidence to prove this. There has been NO public documented or factual evidence to support him having ANYTHING. Yet, some are turning a blind eye to this and continue to, if not openly promote Rossi, give the subtle "thumbs up".
What would you have us think?
Your opinion is coming in loud and clear Bob.My ears are ringing.
In jail?
In jail is where A.R. studied Cold Fusion.
Display MoreIt is really entertaining to read on JONP...and should be eye-opening to the sam's and AA's here. Rossi still doesn't seem to have a clue if his gadget works, but claims to start and sell a certified product based on his marvellous SK Ecat in robotized factories??? How can this be? If you follow carefully his explanations one could think he is already about to prepare the crowd for another fail or delay or big excuse...
If there was a real global player in the game who signed a contract and is about to spend millions Rossi would never be allowed to write such a BS every other day...but I am almost sure that is part of his conspiracy and misleading the snakes and trolls...
Andrea Rossi
October 3, 2018 at 2:42 AMKoen Vandewalle:
As you know, SK stays for Sven Kullander. The Ecat SK evolution has taken substantial advantage from what I learnt from him during our discussions in Uppsala and in Bologna, together with Prof Sergio Focardi and Prof Hanno Essen of the University of Stockholm.
I am strongly indebted with “SK”. I want to say clearly that if , as it seems, the SK will work, the merit is also of Sven Kullander, but if it will fail ( which is not impossible ), the failure will be totally mine, because at the end I decided how to apply what I learnt.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
That comment made sense to me.But is answer to my comment does not.
Sounds like the way an intellectual would answer.
Hello Dr Rossi
You said you learned a lot from Scientists.
If I remember correctly you have skills with tools.
If this is correct can you say what tools and where
you learned these skills.
Regards
Sam
Sam:
Skills and tools are a synthesis of intersubjective forces very complex to analyze in the context of their universe, as your question implies.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Oh the memories! We were so lucky to have all these documents and photos made public. Had we not, it would have become a Dewey said/Rossi said. With the help of his JONP, and support of his sock puppets, Rossi probably would have won out. Today we would be praising Rossi, instead of burying him, and Dewey would probably have stroked out.
Looking forward to the next scam. Unfortunately, we won't get to see anything. What we learn will be from Rossisays, unless this one ends up in court like Doral. That is doubtful, so guess I will have to get my thrills from JONP
If Dewey and Rossi had figured each other out and got along things might have turned
out different.
Not deliberately. They didn't know he was dead.
The rule is if the recipient of the Nobel dies
between the announcement and the presentation they will receive it.
Dr Steinman died before the announcement
but they broke the rule and awarded him the Nobel.
Another Canadian Donna Strickland won a Nobel today in Physics.She did her research not to far from me at the University of Waterloo.My daughter graduated from that
University.
Sam,
I hope he lives long enough to serve time
They might put him in prison if it’s proven
that he has broken the laws of Physics.
Sam, the Nobel is not awarded posthumously. So Rossi is the only one eligible by that restriction. In addition, the Nobel is also not awarded to blatent frauds. So don’t wait up for the announcement.
They gave a Nobel to a dead person once.
https://www.theguardian.com/sc…ze-awarded-dead-scientist
I hope Dr Rossi lives long enough to work
on his invention long enough to prove he has succeeded and receive the Nobel.
Display More... And this year the Nobel Prize in physics goes to
Dt. Andrea Rossi(oh no, Rossi missed his chance again):https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2018/summary/
Arthur Ashkin (1/2), Gérard Mourou (1/4), Donna Strickland (1/4)
However, next year - after the presentation and the mass manufacturing of the e-cat SK - the Nobel prize committee and the Academy surely can not ignore Rossi any longer!
Am I right, @Adrian?
But on this t-shirts the year needs to be updated again.
Andrea Rossi 1/2 Sergio Focardi 1/4 Sven Kullander 1/4.
Display MoreRossi states in an email to FBPE on July 9 2018 he is in Italy and having complicated surgery tomorrow.
See page 20
https://files.acrobat.com/a/pr…03-4fa7-adde-3eb5d60b5c1a
"Please consider that now I am in ltaly ( I am ltalian ) for a complicate surgery that will be done tomorrow.Presumably for 10 days I will not be able to talk or read, so I will be able to read your emails or receive your phonecalls starting from July 20. In August I will be back in the USA."
There is no mention of surgery or Italy on jonp
But he still manages to answer questions every day on JONP between the 10th and the 20th July 2018. Must keep fans happy even on the day of complicated surgery
Just one more misdirection
Definition of presumably - used to convey that what is asserted is very likely though not known for certain.
On July 16 A.R. sends E mail to Jeanne Jones
saying he had the surgery July 11.
On July 11 A.R. posts 3 comments.
Giuseppe:
God allowing, at ninety I think I will allow myself to retire.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Savanna:
I suppose so.
We are preparing a series of experiments to find evidence of this.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Anonymous:
Thank you,
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Display MoreSomeone was asking about a "cease and desist order" against Rossi. Indeed there is one and it, and related official correspondence are here:
https://files.acrobat.com/a/pr…03-4fa7-adde-3eb5d60b5c1a
This is very long therefore here is the gist of it (in my opinion) in a consultant report-- Rossi is not an engineer. Nobody who is currently working with Rossi is an engineer. Making heaters requires engineers. Rossi is not authorized to represent himself or his company as engineers. These are public documents. You can use them any way you like.
Rossi is busted AGAIN.
Mentioned parenthetically, Rossi had "major surgery" about the same time.
Sorry if this is redundant. I have no time to keep up with the threads.
I asked A.R. to comment on the correspondence and this is his reply.
- Andrea Rossi September 29, 2018 at 8:07 AM
Sam:
A troll sent to the Engineer Association a claim saying I am making without authorization the profession of engineer.
The association of the engineers of Florida asked me to refrain from making so.
Upon their request, I certified that I never have offered services as a professional engineer and obviously that I never have made the profession of Engineer in Florida and never offered or will offer my services as a consultant of engineering . They closed the case after due investigation.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Display MoreFor fun, we usually present JONP questions first, and then the answers. Don't cheat now by peaking, but here are the answers. The questioner is not a sock puppet. Try and guess the question:
- Andrea Rossi September 27, 2018 at 3:56 PM
1- we are working on that, but not ready yet
2- enough
3- yes
4- do you prefer your heart or your lever?
5- theoretical work is very important, but not necessary, R&D and industrialization are necessary
6- no. Fire has been used by mankind for ten thousands of years also for industrial applications, basic for the industrial revolution, before the discovery of the chemical reactions of oxygen and the quantic status of the electrons mechanism.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Buck
I think the January presentation will be very interesting given how Rossi answered Question #3 in the following exchange. If the information shared is in line with the Stockholm demonstration with a COP=500, it should create quite a buzz. The energy experts in the crowd will quickly recognize the implications, IMO. The back-of-the-envelope math says: you buy $0.20 of electricity to generate $100 worth of heat . . . that is hard to ignore.
=================================================
Gerard McEk
September 27, 2018 at 3:01 PM
Dear Andrea,
Time is speeding ahead and you are still saying that you’r on track to present a new paradigm change (at least that’s how we as your devoted followers see the Ecat).
Just a few questions:
1. Are you already able to produce the reactors automaticly?
2. How far (in percentage) have you build-up your automatic production facility?
3. Will you uncover the COP, power usage, operation time, maintenace requirements, half load operationele time, etc. etc. at your presentation in January?
Just to get a clear picture of yourself:
4. Do you prefer doing R&D on your Ecat or bringing it into production?
5. Do you prefer doing theoretical work on the Ecat or R&D or bringing it into production?
One last question:
6. Do you believe it is needed to have a full theoretical understanding, when bringing the Ecat on the market?
Thank you for answering our (sometimes personal) questions!
Kind regards, Gerard
______________________________________________
Andrea Rossi
September 27, 2018 at 3:56 PM
Gerard McEk:
1- we are working on that, but not ready yet
2- enough
3- yes
4- do you prefer your heart or your lever?
5- theoretical work is very important, but not necessary, R&D and industrialization are necessary
6- no. Fire has been used by mankind for ten thousands of years also for industrial applications, basic for the industrial revolution, before the discovery of the chemical reactions of oxygen and the quantic status of the electrons mechanism.
Warm Regards,
A.R.
Adrian and Sam are not at all alike in personality. I suppose Adrian could be Sam’s surly grandfather or, judging by the tone of Sam’s comments, great-grandfather.
Is casual observer your smarter brother?