Posts by robert bryant

Argon as the catalyst.
That makes sense

Ag+ ionisation energy = 27.6 from NIST data

Wyttenbach said " the heat's ..somewhere else"

Hopefully the Quarkx can provide some ass-warming
otherwise we''ll be back to coal.
Plenty here in Australia

Froehliche Weihnacten in der Schweiz

http://notrickszone.com/2016/1…ads/#sthash.dquDjqOP.dpbs

Snow in November, for Tokyo
First for 50 years
A cold 2017 winter will greet Quarkx
#

Hi Dad.
Snow arrived in Tokyo a month
or so early..

First time in 50 years
Hannah is enjoying the
snow in Nasu, a liitle way from her Grandma’s town
looks like 2017 will give a very cold
winter in the Northern Hemisphere
A few articles from
influential newspapers now
suggest the Earth is cooling
and has been for some time.
Banki Moon from the UN has
been wrong before and looks to be again.

He may be wearing the
Emperors new climate on his face
And ten thousand
socalled scientists may be wearing it too.
http://www.investors.com/polit…on-the-climate-kids-need/
Trump will tear up Obama’s
CO2 emissions policy this winter most likely.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/…ng-over-last-eight-months
Savour the warmth this summer
in New Zealand
Regards
Robert

Lomax said

"And writers without editors are like boats without anchors."

Here's something attached which may help you.

You might need a rudder too

I found the powerpoint benessimo

Danke shoen. Alan
The wisdom that comes from being in your seventies.
You have added to my limited German vocab.
I shall chew on that during the boring sermon at church today

Alan said "(ICCF-20)

Hopefully there will be good solid news from Sendai next month .. not just photos.

Robert Bryant said " next JCF eeting when?"
Last one was Kyoto December,2015

Perhaps all many researchers are busy with Clean Planet

but possibly the next JCF meeting
December,2016?

Any nyuusu Jed? Alan?

similar photo here

http://asia.nikkei.com/Tech-Sc…od-to-clean-nuclear-waste

similar time.. about a year ago
subsequent to Tohoku Clean Energy April 2015
http://coldfusionnow.org/openi…lab-at-tohoku-university/

"useful heat plus getting rid of radioactive waste" looks to be a very marketable formula for R&D in Japan.

cooperative effort btw nuclear researchers must produce something that works sometime.

look forward to results

next Japan CF Research Society conference is when?

Epimetheus.. No calculations here , but this interview with Andrea Calaon has a less unbiased view on Mills.

Some experimental findings seem to be useful.
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.c…-interview-with-lenr.html

Thanks for your non-enlightenment.
I have added 'perserverate' to my list of Yugoisms

Mary Yugo wrote : "And of course, Rossi made the claim in 1979 when much of the current technology was unavailable to the best, much less to a clod like Rossi"

This seems to be a very sweeping and rhetorical statement.

The idea of recycling waste oil back to around the time of the first oil shock in 1974 and the second oil shock in 1979.
In Australia and NZ(where I did my Chemical Engineering degree) there were start up companies based on recycling used engine oil

e.g
http://wrenoil.com.au/news/wre…t-small-business/#more-73'
http://wrenoil.com.au/news/

The technology is not rocket science.. based on physical separations such as filtration and distillation, (perhaps some catalytic cracking if you wanted diesel.)
The main difficulties was disposing of toxic pollutants and making the process energy efficient.

A parallel idea ,the production of diesel from biological oils, dates back to the same oil shock time e.g 1979 sunflower oil in South Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biodiesel

Mary Yugo wrote

" When I write "you people" the people concerned know exactly the subset I am talking about"

Well I don't know whether I am in the "you people" category or the "Yugo people" category.

I am concerned. Could you enlighten me please on what the characteristics of the "you people" category are.?

Mary Yugo wrote " utterly ignorable"
It's not original but will add it to my list of Yugoism's together with "I'm a nitwit. Makes sense".

I think what Epimetheus was looking for was not a debunking by rhetoric , but by mathematical calculation.

Jed said "I'll ask Iwamura"

Maybe you could ask Iwamura about the materials
CaO-Pd-deuterium system (2005)..? or other

a better translation.. not the best

実験を始めてまだ1年ほどですが、順調に熱が出ています」。

"Experiment has started , there is one year to go, but steady heat output continues."

No details about materials

Iwamura appears to be shifting focus a little from transmutation to energy production

Mary Yugo said "and I'm the nitwit. Makes sense!"

Would I be taking this out of context if I suggested that this is oxymoronic?

Alan Smith said "where's our flying cars"

Does Steve Saint's Amerindian gospel machine count ? http://www.godtube.com/watch/?v=F911JCNU

Wyttenbach said " 85Ev ..is phantasy".

My understanding of the EMNR theory is poor.
this is my take on it. I see things more in chemical terms.

The hyd formation is actually exothermic. I could be wrong. Perhaps Andrea can correct me.
The Bohr atom is based on Coulomb force modified by the DeBroglie standing wave model
The idea is that as you get closer to the nucleus the energy well gets deeper. But the Bohr atom model ignored the magnetic force.
As you get close to the nucleus the magnetic plus electrostatic force can give repulsive or attractive effects.
See Paillet www.iscmns.org/work11/12 Paillet-EDOH-Full1.pdf . Fig 1.
For the zitterbewegung this magnetic force of a charge spinning at velocity c is has a large effect and is phase dependent.
At large distances it approximates to the Coulomb force.
See Lush. 2016 http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.8271
What Andrea is suggesting, I think, is that close to the nucleus at 193 fm there is an energy well or racetrack at 85 EV energy level.due to the magnetic phase harmony between the two zitters.. the proton and the electron.
This 85 eV level is lower than the 13.6 eV Bohr ground level
De Broglie model and possibly zitter phase considerations normally prevent the electron from sliding down
from the ‘ground ‘ level to this racetrack.
However the calculations of even approximate energy profile due to electrodynamic effects at the speed of light close to the nucleus is super difficult.

Global Energy calculations

For Zirconium mediating the hyd formation
E1. Photon (80.35ev) +Zr(+4) --> Zr(+5) +e- = ionisationenergy for Zr(+4) endothermic.
E2. Photon (85eV) + H-e --> --> proton + e- = ‘ionisationenergy’ for hyd, endothermic.
E3. proton + e- --> Photon (85eV) + H-e = reverse of E2 = Hyd formation energy , exothermic
Andrea postulates the formation of H-e or hyd via Zr (+4)
What is the Energy change? Calculate by E1 +E3..

Proton + Zr(+4)--> H-e + Zr(+5) + photon (4.65eV) ,corresponds to 270 nm... deep UV emission.

For Nickel mediating the hyd formation:For Ni(+4), a similar treatment yields a photon of 139 nm..... even deeper UV.

I conclude that,as I think Andrea has mentioned somewhere during hyd formation from there should be emission of deep UV . this is due in my opinion to
the excess of Hyd formation energy released over the energy required for the removal of electrons from the transition metal ions, Zr and Ni.

Eric Walker asked if there is any evidence for electron structure.

These 2012 reports interpret expt with the idea the electron can be split into spinon and orbiton and charge bits
using resonant excitation with energy Xrays (931ev) on Sr2CuO3 lattice

https://www.psi.ch/media/physi…n-electron-inside-a-solid
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1205.1954

^{Andrea Calaon said "}The electron seems to carry a clock."

If this theory is a waste of time ..waste as much of it as you like.. I find these concepts fascinating.