If character flaws were disqualifying, we would have to shut the forum down, and LENR would have withered on the vine long ago. And really...only 7 of his students over a 3 1/2 year period bothered to comment on his teaching strengths. And they rated him average, which IMO is not bad considering he was publicly hung out to dry by his colleagues.
I have taught "residual water treatment" for one semester at the local university, and I was very dissapointed with the quality of the alumni (I would have sent most of them back to high school, they lacked basic arithmetic skills), so I would not even consider anything they would have say negative about me.
I think they are comparing the O17 to O16 ratios somehow
Also there is HDO..
2D+O18 =Ne22??? another possibility?
Robert, this arose from the finding that water taken out of the reactor had a significant increase on density (up to 3%). This is not said in the paper, you have to see the videos posted prior in this thread, this means a significant amount of the O in the water is O17 for explaining the increased density. 100% H2O17 is 1.044 g/mL.
Given 3% heavier water (see post #84 above), a liter of that water would have 25.55 gms of H2O17.
The yield of bomb on Hiroshima was 15 kilotons of TNT.
Synthesis of 25.55 gms of H2O17 from H2O16 would yield energy equal to 0.402 kilotons of TNT (assuming perfect yield of energy from the mass loss).
If the energy yield was only about 4/10,000 of perfect (yield seen for Santilli's intermediate fusion patent application) then one expects 1.61 x 105 kcal.
Will B. J. Huang share their best estimate of heat yield per liter of 3% H2O17?
Display More
I don’t think the only reaction happening is the formation of O17, but the balance of it all tends to an equilibrium in which the result is a net production of O17. For what I understand this is a closed system and all
the interactions are between the water and the pipes, and as the water gets pumped and cavitation is produced hydrodynamically, the excess heat is measured versus electric input of the systems needed to keep the reactor working.
I think we have to take a moment to really appreciate and let sink in the relevance of the production of highly O17 enriched water. That is the least abundant Oxygen isotope. The sample of 250 milligrams of 70% H2O17 sells for around USD 1500 (Medical Isotopes Inc.). Producing O17 enriched water at will is a major proof of LENR happening in bjhuang ’s cavitation system. There’s no way around it. This is massive proof. This is a tantalizing realization!
BG has a new video out. At 8:20 he announces a paper he co-authored with Huang was peer reviewed, and will be published by the major journal Nature Scientific Report's. Congratulations go to MFMP, and BJ Huang.
Well, I wasn’t telling from the map, just from my watch that marks 10:24 AM at this moment (finishing my breakfast on a lazy Sunday morning, after a 36 hours fast, I fast for 36 hours twice a week, been doing it for some years now).
Interesting series of videos posted by the MFMP on a visit to bjhuang ’s laboratory. I am positively impressed by the scale of the operation. Of special interest to me is the claim that water coming out of the reactor is measurably different in density (up to 3%), I am really intrigued to know if analysis of the electric conductivity, pH and total dissolved solids has been performed, considering that the water that goes in the reactor is De Ionized.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Italian Researcher Mr. Daniele Gozzi has shared the following link to David Nygren and I think is a great resource to keep at hand that includes some really interesting material many of us may be completely unaware of its existence.
Well, transmutation is what drives the process presented by Aureon in their latest video, but they are focusing in radioactive isotope stabilization for commercial reasons. This is why I posted only research addressing radioactive elements there. There is another paper by a Japanese team with reduction of K40 radioactivity by cavitation, but the pdf I have has a glitch in the fonts and only the very brief English abstract is readable.
Here’s the confounding factor: the printed lab results state values in ug/L with two significant decimal points. One can see that the desk image 2 has the values for the control sample. If this is correct, the table comparing the control to the processed water is also in ug/L but with three significant decimal points. So, it would imply that the Thorium level in the control is just 44 ug/L and this is very low (44 mg/cubic meter). This requires clarification, because I can hardly believe that a produced fracking water would have so low levels of sodium, which is usually in
From these one could say that the Control Sample is what is seen in the Printed results on desk 2 image (which only has 3 elements detected above the MDL, hence all others are considered to be not present, except for the Thorium that was purposefully added), and therefore the point in the table would be a decimal point. So the total amounts, if this is the correct interpretation, are really small.
Mark Pinnell , it would be great if you could ask for clarification of the units employed. The results printed in paper visible on a desk in the video clearly show ug/L which would stand for micrograms per liter, which is very small quantities (milligrams per cubic meter, as opposed to mg/L which translates to grams per cubic meter). Also I have doubts if the point in the table is a decimal point or a thousand point, it literally changes the interpretation by 4 orders of magnitude. It is confusing.
Note apart, seeing Michael Clarage playing “The Butterfly” in a traverse flute was a specially enthralling insight of how joyfull the people involved are. That was a really brilliant moment of the video, from a metaphysical perspective.
And last: Why testing Thorium? Thorium is no problem at all as it can be easily filtered out. For storing the waste all the 232Th decay chain products need to be remediated.
I think you are missing the point altogether: The results imply that thorium present in the treated water sample dissapeared for the most part, and many elements initially not present either in the aqueous solition or the solid parts in contact with the solution, became present, thus giving rise to the possibility that the dissapeared thorium was transmuted to stable elements.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.More DetailsClose
