OKay, now how your mind could manage the "Quark" concept ?
Gentlemen! At a fundamental level, any movement of matter is cold nuclear fusion, that is, a cold fusion generator, an electric current generator and any engine are identical. The movement of matter can be created only in one way - by consuming mass, that is, turning it into neutrino radiation. This can only be known on the basis of a new scientific paradigm:
Probably some kind of excitations not well yet understood should induce neutrons removal from some nuclei.
Yes, cavitation isn't especially needed.
Display MoreMay not even need compression...
Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from a Titanium-Deuterium System
May 1989 EPL (Europhysics Letters)
Antonella De Ninno
Antonio Frattolillo
et al.
Soon ? (i'm joking) 
Hi
I have collected various objects produced by spark discharge thanks to high voltage pulses on multilayer composite sheets of Polyester-Aluminium-Polyethylene. The maximum size of objects is approximately 2 mm. What in particular could have originated the straight segment?
Thanks for your opinion..
Agree, it was also my jurg's reading
Je pense que Wyttenbach dit que le flux EM crée de la masse ; en électrons, et protons
car il se plie sur un femtomètre ou moins de rayon (en 3D, 4D.....
Bien sûr, le flux EM se déplace à la vitesse de la lumière
tout comme le courant alternatif dans un fil
mais pas les particules elles-mêmes
Well, seriously i have always been amazed by pure mathematicians. This is a field where I am and I have always been bad... A pure mathematician as you said to be, remains a great mystery to me.
For example, Einstein, beyond his certain mathematical foundation, had mainly developed his models through his emphasis on geometry rather..
I believe if someone can't develop a theory with a strong mathematical basis, they shouldn't be making fake "theories".
I do not feel qualified to be making such postulates. I only have a BS in Engineering Physics from Cornell, and I work with mathematical algorithms and physics related phenomena. But I have never really worked in pure physics. So that does not qualify me to make broad based speculations. I do feel qualified to judge certain people as unqualified to make their broad all-knowing statements. And I think those type of people are really bad for our goal of getting LENR research accepted.
Agree that nothing travel at speed of light but probably it acts as a limit on which "things" as waves or particles bump then bounce onto it.... because nothing possesses a stable speed.. everything plays by acceleration/deceleration with speed of light acting as one limit, the second one being the nucleus center acting as an funnel ... a one way direction
Mass never is a classic plane (free) wave. If you expand waves to manifolds then we have classic multidimensional standing waves. From here it is easy to grasp that these must be single sided. EM flux only can be bent by (topological) charge.
What some physicists mix up is a wave like resonance picture we see in electron diffraction and the electron being a classic wave. Waves travel at light speed electrons never.
No balls involved ouffff we are safe 😎
Thank you for your reply, interesting.
Nowif you consider that all masses should be seen as magnetic flux more or less speed, how could you explain in this same way, that sometime we are talking about particle/wave ? I can understand that is a "massive" particle drowned in pure EM energie ? Do i wrong ?
Of course this is an internal acceleration in the new plane also inwards due to shrinking. But these events are more or less immediate and must be described by Dirac delta functions same as photon absorption/emission. But in LENR we often see some multi step shrinking what will be new physics if there are not fix spectral steps involved.
Finally, it could be confirmed even if remaining deep work, very encouraging A breakthrough ....
Next Big Feature article.
Dark matter simplest proposal :the issue can readily be explained by the Charge exchange process, i.e. by loosing its electric charge, ions are transferred to neutral particles - no longer affected by ambient magnetic fields. However, transferred to ions now capable of emitting electromagnetic waves. Doppler-shifted neutral particle waves being the “signum" of dark matter.
Display MoreI think that the LENR reaction explain more than the production of gainful energy. It is a gateway into new science that can greatly advance the assent of mankind.
For example, using the EVO, black holes as an element of quantum computing can be produced in a controlled and stable manor.
According to the holographic principle, information about a black hole's
interior is encoded on its two-dimensional surface area. This surface area is known as the black hole's event horizon. We have already seen this black hole event horizon's surface presented in our observations as those micron sized crenellated balls of transmuted matter.
The information is said to be smeared on those two-dimensional spheres, described by the event horizon. The information is encoded on the surface as a hologram.
The amount of information that can be stored in a black hole is only limited by its surface area. The storage capacity increases as the black hole swallows matter. The amount of data that could be stored on the surface of the EVO black hoke is on the order of 10^50 hard disks. Allowing science to access and control of these black holes is a advancement of unlimited potential.
In the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, also known as the gauge/gravity duality, it is believed that the information encoded on the event horizon of an Anti-de Sitter (AdS) black hole can be read out. The AdS/CFT correspondence is a theoretical framework that relates a gravitational theory in AdS space to a boundary conformal field theory (CFT). According to this duality, the information stored in the black hole is dual to the degrees of freedom of the boundary CFT.
In the AdS/CFT correspondence, the information is not lost but rather encoded in the correlations and entanglement of the CFT degrees of freedom. The boundary CFT can be thought of as a holographic representation of the gravitational theory in the bulk AdS space, including the black hole. The information encoded on the event horizon can, in principle, be reconstructed by studying the properties of the boundary CFT.
However, it's important to note that the AdS/CFT correspondence is a highly theoretical framework and its precise details and limitations are still under active investigation. Providing science with a AdS black hole provides valuable insights into the understanding of black holes and information storage, the practical implementation of reading the information from the event horizon of an AdS black hole will be facilitated with access to the AdS black hole will be an area for ongoing and future research and a topic of active study in the field of quantum computing.
Well your 2023 fight is going forward in 2024 apparently too 
So, here we discuss to better define who is an expert and who is not.
Anyway, we are all some great experts regarding our respective ego
Now, to me , however i already have prefered makers ( even of bullshit) than spectators.
Probably you could become too a maker if you could share with us some of your own Lenr postulates.
Regarding axil i like some of his ideas ( not all for sure 
)
For example surface excited by light should generate some electrons movements.
These movements when reaching some walls, defects, etc will induce sometimes strong EM field when electron movement is slowed down so by these defect. Strong EM field id postulated too by Wyttenbach if i well understood.
So this axil's way should be the explanation to me for most of the Lenr experiments since 1989.
Now to conclude, unfortunately, i don't think unfortunately that could be the way for powerfull Lenr devices at all.
Did Lenny discuss how to seperate the split EVO entangled pair by 10 billion light years? I could watch the video but I would prefer an explanation from an "expert".
By new rotation do you mean that is an EM flux acceleration or deceleration to explain the mass involvement ?
This is explained in all depth in SOP (SO(4) physics) a model for nuclear mass and ground states
Mass reduction occurs as harmonically resonant EM flux starts a new rotation, what allows to store more energy in the same volume, what is equal to the fact that all involved flux lines in average get shorter.
Hello,
i wish to all members and LF staff my best for this new year.
New... it will mostly depend of targets we plan, motivation, removing ego ( Deep thoughts to Peter Gluck) and hard work.
Hoping in parallel that luck will go too in a positive way.
David
You should more take in account for the coming year that is a REAL pb ( tara's UFO for example)
Now, i wish you all the best for 2024 however.
We had a well known gentleman tell us recently how nice the newsletter and NEWS website were, but that the forum is for "blah blah"...which he doesn't like That may be true
Басқаларды тыңдай алмасаңыз, бұл қарапайым, себебі сіз басқаларды тыңдай білмейсіз... сіз үшін бір ғана адам маңызды, ол сізсіз. сен ауыр эгоистсің
Уже 35 лет ищем и еще столько же искать будете...
Hello, why are you focused on the neutrino involvement ?
It could be interesting to know why because only few people are enough skilled in this way ? Me for example
I propose to influence the reaction LENR with radioactive nickel 63Ni28, which emits antineutrinos!
Again,
plasmons are working up to maybe 15eV range, Hagelstein phonon' s are playing in a similar range.
Now, for example the Japanese Tanabe postulate that EM field from plasmons can be enhanced up to 10exp7.
For example a large difference between width and length of nanoparticles induces that.
What does that mean ?
No kinetic energy of electrons isn't enhanced by factor 7 but if the electron current is braked strongly because a gap, a tip etc... that implies a great enhancement of the local magnetic field as can do a square form ( vs sine form).
Another example, a magnetron that converts the electron kinetic energy into EM energy.
Formers wake up
Probably the WL explanation ( by plasmons) is unsignificant now if you include of the global thoughts:
The Dubinsko discrete breathers,
the plasmons enhanced model of Tanabe,
And experiment conclusions in thin film made by Chicea,
you should be able to go forward, i expect.
Probably the WL explanation ( by plasmons) is unsignificant now if you include of the global thoughts:
The Dubinsko discrete breathers,
the plasmons enhanced model of Tanabe,
And experiment conclusions in thin film made by Chicea,
you should be able to go forward, i expect.
Display MoreSteven.. I noted that Peter Hagelstein,MIT may not been at Szczecin for your presentation about the WL model?
As you noted Hagelstein wrote in 2013..
" This model is the single most successful theoretical model that the field has seen since it started;"
but there was a lot more written.. 22 pages..
it has served as the theoretical justification for a program at NASA; ...
The first step in the model involves the proposed accumulation of mass by electrons through Coulomb interactions with electrons and ions in highly-excited coupled plasmon and optical phonon modes.
Historically for us this mass increase has been hard to understand, so we were motivated in this study to understand better how this comes about. To study it, we consider simple
classical models which show the effect, from which we see that the mass increase can be associated with the electron kinetic energy.The basic results of the simple classical model carry over to the quantum problem in the case of simple wave packet solutions. Since there are no quantum fluctuations of the longitudinal field in the Coulomb gauge, the resulting problem is conventional, and
we find no reason to expect MeV electron kinetic energy in a conventional consideration of electrons in metals.
We consider the numerical example outlined in a primer on the Widom–Larsen model,
and find that multiple GW/cm2 would be required to support
the level of vibrational excitation assumed in the surface layer;
this very large power per unit area falls short by orders of magnitude the power level needed to make up the expected energy loss of the mass-enhanced electrons.
We note that the mass enhancement of an electron in a transverse field is connected to acceleration, so that the electron radiates.A similar effect is expected in the longitudinal case, and
a very large amount of easily detected X-ray radiation would be expected if an MeV-level mass enhancement were present even in a modest number of electrons.
At the end of his detailed paper Hagelstein wrote..
Presumably Widom and Larsen will clarify things in their future publications.
I was wondering if Widom and Larsen did " clarify things" ,especially the matters highlighted in blue..
https://www.iscmns.org/CMNS/JCMNS-Vol12.pdf
P.L. Hagelstein / JCMNS12 (2013) 18–40
these peaks principle seems to looking like the ponderomotive force.
Graneau worked also in the same way.
Display MoreVigier,,1992
The attempt to find some common theoretical explanation
for electrolytic LENR and capillary fusion was ambitious..
..perhaps by an inexperienced horseman...
The extreme conditions of capillary fusion as done
by Lochteholtgreven et al
have little in common with electrolysis
"
Very nice paper from a time when printers didn't existed yet
In the same way, i like reading again some first investigations what could not be necessary unrelevant, as this Vigier's thoughts.
An interesting read from 1990- contemporary account of the start of the controversy.
