At one time he said he did [share it] and that they replicated it based on his formula. But, if it is based on the patent he got in the U.S., there is only scattered and poor evidence that the formula outlined in the patent actually works. Objectively evaluated based on the array of replication attempts, it does not work as presented. I read the statements by [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] and Rossi, at least partly, as subtle shots at each other. [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is saying, you are just one of many possibilities and we will decide whether we think your product works based on the scientific merit. Rossi says back, from now on only LC will perform tests and nobody else is allowed. [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is just one of many licensees for the Ecat. I own the IP and understand how it works.
In the end, [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] is in a superior position because they have apparently other possibilities and they don't have to be tied to Rossi. This in addition to the fact that they hold the purse strings! Of course if Rossi does indeed have something that works, they all win. [lexicon]IH[/lexicon] can objectively evaluate Rossi's technology, because they can just move on to something else if it doesn't work.