The Playground - No more Covid Games Please.

  • These were split roughly equally between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.

    Just explain your factor 8 more unvaxx child!


    You have no understanding about cheating. The old people that die in hospital stay in average 10 days and then leave in a coffin. Younger stay much longer and finally walk out. So if you look at hospital load you get a 200% wrong figure. This "vaccine" terror mafia trick is used world wide to fake the figures.

  • Just explain your factor 8 more unvaxx child!


    You have no understanding about cheating. The old people that die in hospital stay in average 10 days and then leave in a coffin. Younger stay much longer and finally walk out. So if you look at hospital load you get a 200% wrong figure. This "vaccine" terror mafia trick is used world wide to fake the figures.

    You can tech me probably about cheating?😃

    Everybody who cites sources with numbers not in line with your antivaxx propaganda is cheating, it seems..

  • Everybody who cites sources with numbers not in line with your antivaxx propaganda is cheating, it seems..

    So you agree you spread fake news? OR can you explain your 8x??? How do you derive 8x from 50:50???

    (Hint:: Any fat child news how to do it!)


    More cheating from today's Swiss news::


    Spital-Fake: Kern aller Massnahmen crasht - Inside Paradeplatz
    Die wahren Covid-Hospitalisationen sind nur halb so hoch wie von den Behörden publiziert. Die ganze Virus-Strategie zerfällt in Echtzeit.
    insideparadeplatz.ch


    The FM/R/J/B mafia constantly did blow up (40..50%!!) hospital figure by testing all hospital patients and adding them to the CoV-19 hospitalized. I guess all the Zoruds/Zeus twins did did world wide to cheat the population.

  • UK vaccine report of week 1 2022!

    https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1045073/Vaccine_surveillance_report_week_1_2022.pdf


    The picture is clear: The vaccinate do fuel the pandemic as their infection rate did increase further. As always we have to multiply in the 2x for the "recovered and vaccinated", that only for cheating reasons are subsumed under vaccinated.


    Thanks to the boosters the death rate for age <7 0 has gone down by 2x. But also here we do not know the exact percentage of the recovered.


    There is a nice trend in the unvaxx group age > 80 where absolutely more people die albeit the death/cases gets smaller. So this could already be an Omicron effect.

    Such things make it difficult to compare current/past figures.

  • As explained in very great detail below for another dataset, doing a similar comparison, you always get anomamous results from wide age ranges (e.g. 0-50) where the facrion of vaccianted within the age range correlastes with age. In that case unvaccinated => mostly younger => mostly lower risk


    This is a very LARGE effect when you have large age ranges and large variation in vaccination as here.

    It can also apply to > 50 but less likely because the variation on vaccination across ages is less (older people mostly are vaccinated).


    Why does W so often ask us to look at these < 50 statistics? It is because without splitting them into smaller cohorts you often get this problem which makes the results all wrong - but right from W's point of view.


    NB - thsi is an entirely sepaarte issue from the Israeli dataset porbelm I pointed out where W was thinking he has detected a trend from only 3 or 4 isolated cases because his subgrouped numbers were too small.


    However, in the analysis in the link below the uncertainty due to small numbers is added in to the graphs nicely - so that mistake could not be made.


    UK Dataset split by vaccination status and age - example of statistics problem using large age ranges for younger people

  • Federal Judge Quotes John Madison & JFK Then Orders FDA to Transfer Pfizer Vaccine Data to Public at Accelerated Rate


    Federal Judge Quotes John Madison & JFK Then Orders FDA to Transfer Pfizer Vaccine Data to Public at Accelerated Rate
    Transparency, accessibility, and advancement of medical research represent a driving force for TrialSite, and recently, the move for greater translucence
    trialsitenews.com



    Transparency, accessibility, and advancement of medical research represent a driving force for TrialSite, and recently, the move for greater translucence scored a victory regarding accessing the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine product data. TrialSite has followed the transparency case led by attorney Aaron Siri and his firm Siri Glimstad. A Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) matter, up until now the federal judge followed the calls for opaqueness, by ensuring comprehensive access to the Pfizer FDA application data at a snail’s pace—500 pages per month would make the entire trove available in 55 years. Then, after a back and forth in court, the FDA added insult to injury by proposing to extend the full download of the Pfizer data to 75 years. Representing the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), attorney Siri at first sought to secure the entire batch of data within 108 days, which just so happens to be the amount of time it took for the Gold Standard regulatory agency to review and approve Pfizer’s vaccine. As TrialSite’s Sonia Elijah has uncovered, numerous concerns were raised after review of just one currently available set of Pfizer vaccine safety documents. Now, the attorney reports the federal judge rejected the FDA’s latest aggressive moves for unacceptable opacity—the court has more closely aligned with Siri’s clients and compelled the regulatory agency to now accelerate the data transfer—from 500 pages per month to 55,000 pages per month! In making this proclamation, the judge referred to quotes from both James Madison and John F. Kennedy emphasizing important attributes of good government.


    Make a Good Decision—Have the Proper Data

    TrialSite suggests that this ruling represents a real opportunity for what can become an eventual improvement in the mission-critical risk-benefit analysis needed for determination of benefit, or risk of COVID vaccination with the Pfizer vaccine called BNT162b2, or “Comirnaty.”


    The mass vaccination of very young children, for example, raises several important ethical questions that can only be properly addressed by a rigorous, independent, and unbiased risk-benefit analysis of the true benefits and costs of this vaccine. But without underlying comprehensive product data there can be no such independent analyses.


    As Siri reports himself, the latest ruling will make data available enabling independent scientists the ability to “offer solutions and address serious issues with the current vaccine program—issues which include waning immunity, variants evading vaccine immunity, and as the CDC has confirmed, that the vaccines do not prevent transmission.”


    Bioethicists can make a strong case that forced mandates presuppose a few critical prerequisite factors, such as quality, safety, and effectiveness. In this case, a growing number of scientists, physicians, and health policy analysts, as well as political representatives, share concerns that the COVID-19 vaccines have failings that must be uncovered, analyzed, and better understood. The stakes are too high.


    But who could deny that with a mandated medical procedure on hundreds of millions of people, that it’s right and proper that the regulatory agency involved allow for the transparency of underlying product documentation? Why would the FDA keep back critical COVID-19 vaccine data from the public when a substantial portion of that consumer base is coerced to engage in an unwanted medical procedure?


    Apparently, this judge came around to the significance and importance of this case. He “recognized the release of this data is of paramount public importance and should be one of the FDA’s highest priorities,” wrote Siri.


    Interestingly, the federal judge quoted two former popular presidents in this latest hearing. Referring to James Madison, the judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas declared a “popular government, without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy.” This was followed by a quote from John F. Kennedy: “a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”


    As the data becomes available, TrialSite will collaborate with scientists to interrogate the trove for important data, insights, and breakthroughs—translated and streamlined and delivered in understandable, concise prose. One true hope—that Pfizer isn’t afforded the opportunity to redact too much of the information.


  • As explained in very great detail below

    Why should anybody read your clown posts if you don't even understand such simple things as recovered counted as vaccinated?? Recovered, at least up to delta, are 40 better protected than the people getting a CoV-19 gen therapy (vaccine).

    March 2020 40% of UK population was recovered already. The same figures are seen in all countries world wide. If you just add the new UK CoV-19 cases then far more than 50% count as recovered.


    So fact is since 4 months:: IN UK the vaccinated get far more often (up to 6x!!) CoV-19 than unvaxx/recovered!


    These figures only change by fractions of you count in rounding errors for the unvaxx group size!

    What do you like more 5x or 6x?


    It's a pandemic of the vaccinated - since 4 months already!

  • You seem to ignore the statistics or be unable to do the math…

    I admit to was wrong about 0,5….maybe you can explain the math of the report in a way that everybody can follow your way to not end up with 7,5x based on the reported numbers. and please

    Here once again for you:


    „Over the 4 weeks to 14 December 2021, 525 Covid-19 deaths were recorded in Switzerland. These were split roughly equally between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. However, to make sense of these numbers it is essential to look at the number of people in each group. Once this is factored in the life-saving power of vaccines is clear.

    Nearly all of those dying were 60 or over2. Among this age group, 88% were fully vaccinated, 1% partially vaccinated and 11% unvaccinated. This means that roughly half of Switzerland’s Covid deaths over the last 4 weeks have occurred among a relatively small number of unvaccinated people. In fact, the unvaccinated in this age group (60+) have been dying at a rate 7.53 times higher than the vaccinated, essentially because the vaccinated now outnumber the unvaccinated by 7.5 to 1.“


    If the numbers reported in your country are fake, cheated or wrong, then please report the numbers that show the real situation with a source other than Wyttentwisted…

  • CDC just published a paper that admits that VAERS is underreported by at least 6.5X about study COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States, November 3–December 19, 2021


    Approximately 5.1% of parents reported that their child was unable to perform normal daily activities on the day after receipt of dose 1, and 7.4% after receipt of dose 2. Approximately 1% of parents reported seeking medical care in the week after vaccination; most medical care was received via a clinic appointment (441; 0.6%). Fourteen (0.02%) children reportedly received care at a hospital; information regarding reason for hospitalization was available for five children and included appendicitis (two), vomiting and dehydration (one), respiratory infection (one), and retropharyngeal cellulitis (one). Parents and guardians of all hospitalized children were contacted; two parents completed VAERS reports, and one revealed hospitalization was reported in error.


    In short, 13 child hospitalizations (since one of the 14 was a mistake), yet only 2 VAERS reports were filed.

    Actually this estimation is consistent with another sources, but it may be still underestimated for specific types of adverse effects of vaccines like stillborns, which women usually don't hurry to report at all, not to say in public databases. So, how much VAERS data are under-reporting actual vaccination side-effects?


    In November 2020, a paper was published in the journal Vaccines looking specifically at the question of estimating underreporting rates for VAERs for anaphylaxis (and Guillain Barre syndrome) for 7 different vaccines. They compared VAERs reporting rates to incident rates in the Vaccine Safety Database (VSD) network as a reference. VSD is organized by the CDC consisting of 9 healthcare organizations, shown to be representative of the USA population in many key demographic categories. This study found anaphylaxis had an URR between 1.3x to 8x, depending on the specific vaccine. Regulators look for reporting patterns that can be corroborated by additional evidence. For example, reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome should be more common in people over 50 than in younger adults. This can help researchers identify potential adverse events that were not detected in clinical trials. European side effects database gives similar results and it can be edited only by health care professionals with registration.

  • Australian government offers up to $600,000 for Covid vaccine injuries. About 79,000 people have been injured and registered so far.

    People in all other countries of the world are apparently way more resistant against adverse effects of vaccines - or just silly, if they don't demand the same compensation.. ;) The other question is, if some money can compensate premature death and/or crippling of health to the end of life. But if nothing else it shows the actual scope of damage of public health with m-RNA vaccines, which still gets tightly covered before public in all other countries.

  • unvaccinated in this age group (60+) have been dying at a rate 7.53 times higher than the vaccinated, essentially because the vaccinated now outnumber the unvaccinated by 7.5 to 1.“

    As said cheating child. The recovered rate here is around 70%! so your factor boils down to 2.5 as everywhere e.g. UK!

  • People in all other countries of the world are apparently way more resistant against adverse effects of vaccines - or just silly, if they don't demand the same compensation.. ;)

    The reality is that in most countries today the FM/R/B mafia has a large majority in all courts. Here in Switzerland even patient support groups that claim to help you are effectively run by the mafia. Target: Minimization of total cost. They pay your lawyer but not the damage...

    So people should finally realize that a small mafia rules their live...

  • How Underreported Are Post-Vaccination Serious Injuries and Deaths in VAERS?  What does 6,000 American deaths in the VAERS database mean? Are they less underreported because SAEs are less underreported than AEs? AEs are their own kind of category because people suffering a mild headache and nothing more may simply move on with their lives and never report. Despite legal reporting requirements regarding COVID-19 vaccines, it is clear that cases go unreported. Even worse, we know that vaccine deaths seem to be automatically classified as COVID-19 deaths. Given financial incentives to hospitals and to families for funeral benefits, it may be that deaths are more underreported than SAEs.

  • Dr. Marik resigns from position at EVMS in midst of legal battle with Sentara over use of ivermectin


    Dr. Marik resigns from position at EVMS in midst of legal battle with Sentara over use of ivermectin


    NORFOLK, Va. - An Eastern Virginia Medical School professor and doctor at Sentara Healthcare who is leading an effort to make a controversial drug, ivermectin, a standard treatment for COVID-19 patients, has resigned from his position at EVMS.


    Dr. Paul Marik resigned from his position as professor of medicine and chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School in Norfolk to pursue other interests, according to the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance.


    On Tuesday the FLCC released a statement regarding Dr. Marik's resignation.


    “There is no doubt that Professor Marik will be missed by his colleagues and students at EVMS,” said Dr. Pierre Kory, president and chief medical officer of the FLCCC. “I have been honored to call him my colleague and friend in the past 18 months and I am privileged to continue to work with him as we lead the FLCCC together in the coming year.”


    Marik says the decision to resign was not an easy one to make.


    “This was not an easy decision to make, but I felt it was time to focus my attention and energy to other interests in both academia and public health, I am looking forward to this next chapter in my career and continuing to make a difference in the world of medicine,” Marik stated.


    The FLCCC congratulated Dr. Marik on his impact in medicine and time with the FLCCC.


    Marik, who is also a critical care doctor at Sentara Norfolk, is in the midst of a legal battle over use of ivermectin. He sued Sentara because he believes the drug can help kill the COVID-19 virus.


    Marik is suing the healthcare system because they won't allow him to treat COVID-19 patients with ivermectin, along with a host of other drugs that make up his developed MATH+ Protocol.


    Marik says he's never actually prescribed ivermectin for COVID-19 patients, but his attorney says he's relied on research and studies to come to the belief that it's safe and effective in treating them.


    Sentara suspended his duties in the ICU back in November, and he "has no plans to return to Sentara Norfolk General Hospital as the Director of the ICU due to their continued prohibition of safe and effective treatments for COVID-19," a spokesperson said in a statement to News 3.

  • Despite legal reporting requirements regarding COVID-19 vaccines, it is clear that cases go unreported. Even worse, we know that vaccine deaths seem to be automatically classified as COVID-19 deaths.

    No surprise after the Swiss uncovering that between 40..50% of all hospital CoV-19 cases did not enter as CoV-19 cases. So all chemo deaths with CoV-19 will end up as CoV-19 deaths. Also car crash victims...


    Further 1.2% of the Pfizer gen therapy victims get "vaccine" immune suppressed CoV-19 after jab 1 . This did kill about 200 people during the Israel booster phase. We did see the same in UK. The high reduction in the death rate later is admitted to the booster but as said the death rate has been artificially fueled by the booster itself.....


    Only idiots kill themselves with a CoV-19 gene therapy...

  • I am fully vaccinated and support this for elderly and weak people, but tend to be less judging against non vaccinated. It is as it is. Also I have a friend that got severe side effects from the vaccination and hence are not fully vaccinated. New fact is that she met with a person (ame area) that had a similar side effect and the doctor for this person advised not to take the vaccine. But now over to my friend, My friends doctor said it was not a side effect from the vaccine as he could not find any similar cases in the Swedish medic database, hence a correlation and not causation. Obviously this doctor is incompetent and can't search databases. My friend is not happy to be demonisized as a non-vaccer and treated like a paria. I discussed this with other friends and we have decided that we do not like how the society is turning on this issue. The big problem is that we categorise people in to large groups. Anf if you are unlucky your life can be miserable without no reason. My friend is a working doctor, quite talented, and also a researcher who knows all about medical statistics. We have of caused discussed correlation and causation but concluded that when the doctors can't find known cases in their searches, safest is not to trust them on their judgement. She is now trying to find another better doctor.