Hi all
Have IH's lawyers admitted they intended to defraud both investors and Rossi all along?
I refer to the 2nd Jones Day motion to dismiss:
https://www.lenr-forum.com/for…of-Motion-to-Dismiss-pdf/
Where apparently their argument is that they had no intention of fulfilling the contract. Who do they think they will bamboozle with that logic?
That they wrote it with that in mind. Hmm... What does that sound like?
And any amendments they signed to don't count. Hmm... Yeh that is interesting, is it not?
And apparently please Mr. Judge don't include Darden or Cherokee in the case even though they made the approach. Do you think the Judge will fall for that?
IMHO I think this second motion to dismiss is going the same place as first. What do you think?
Kind Regards walker