without the repetition destroying other stuff.
Its not destroying stuff THHuxleynew and you well know it
Don't chihuahua-like yap to the Moderators. with your noise
Why should I start another thread?
Your arxiv find Durr et al 2015>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.4088.pdf
was right on the topic of this thread..
-precision and calculation in modelling of physics
It's just that your precision has been found very wanting and you can't man up to admit that
you mistakenly assumed 6 digit precision which turned out to be 2 digit precision
So much for your assumed precision of QED/QCD modelling of nuclear physics
Another thread as Wyttenbach suggested should be devoted to
"but we know also now that already tomorrow there could be a better solution/model than we have today."
perhaps I will start another thread Einstein was right? Virginia