Because you or Shane do not know what the other research is, does not mean it does not exist.
I never said that.
QuoteYou are only speculating that the other research is not worth much.
No need to speculate so much. Can you list the other researches, and how much are they worth in your opinion? For instance, since you have already cited him, how many million dollars does it worth the research that Letts presented at ICCF21 in which he claims to have obtained a few watts of excess heat?
QuoteI would think the situation is the reverse as you have painted it. Woodford did not invest the larger dollar (pound) amounts until after they had visited all of the researchers IH was supporting at the time and not prior to that just based on Rossi's claims of 1MW.
I have never said that. It's obvious that whoever wants to invest the equivalent of 50 M$ will try to get as much information as possible. In this specific case we know that Woodford representatives visited the Ecat plant in Doral and that they were told that it was producing around 1 MW of heat on a continuous basis since many months.
Anyway, can you please make a list of the other researchers supported by IH, and visited by Woodford in that occasion, along with the claimed performances of their devices?
QuoteAlso they realized it may take years to be ready for commercialization and thus put it in the holding company and not IH itself and now waits for the farther development of that research before turning it over. That is "keeping their powder dry" for those development by the other groups IH has and is funding.
Let me understand. Perhaps do you mean that in 2015 a renowned investment fund did freeze 50 M$ of its clients' money into a holding company, just hoping that a research in a field discredited by mainstream science will eventually grasp some valuable development after almost 30 years of unsuccessful attempts?