Display MoreThis is a court case, not an experiment.
As Mats said in a recent interview (*) , the data filed so far is the tip of the iceberg. Both Rossi and IH have filed close to the minimum required to keep the case alive, so it can reach the jury. Rossi is under no legal obligation (and would be unwise) to present any defense at this stage except to answer the counter-complaint "deny and demand strict proof thereof").
Rossi is correct in declining to answer any questions relating to the case.
I still don't understand why deep-insider Dewey is leaking/signalling information about the case, which may or may not be true, and may or may not be presented in the case.
* Mats recent article is from October, and so doesn't even take into account recent court filings.
Finally a reasonable post from someone who understands the US legal system. Thats why scientist should not practice law and Lawyers should not do science.