Jed - wasn't my proposal...as said, C&P from ITER home page. If they confuse power and energy they should better quit their plans to solve at some point in time the energy problems of our planet...
Clearance Items
-
-
The COP figure seems to be an "ITER goal" and part of their exorbitant self-esteem, not sure ...this is common stuff to google from the ITER page, and you can find the JET data in other places as well...
Yes, "exorbitant self-esteem" seems an appropriate way to define the "ITER goal" and Krivit has provided a much more realistic power balance (the energy one is even worse), which turns out to be negative (1):
However, I'd remind everyone that this thread is dedicated to the F&P experiments and I would ask the mods to possibly move all the above comments, including this one, somewhere more appropriate, as anticipated (2).
(1) http://news.newenergytimes.net…t-and-iter-fusion-claims/
-
Another helpful glimpse into the mind of KM and how he sees things.
I really am sad for this guy.
-
Another helpful glimpse into the mind of KM and how he sees things.
I really am sad for this guy.
Another helpful glimpse into the mind of KM and how he sees things.
***I suppose there's some truth to that. I like to steer folks to LENR-CANR.org, I like to nail down things like how many times the PFAHE has been replicated in peer reviewed journals, that kind of thing. We'll just let lurkers see for themselves.
I really am sad for this guy.
***That seems to speak volumes for where you're coming from. You've gotten so deeply wound up in your adam henry-ness that you can't see past it. My advice to your employers at IH (which you admit is the case) is that they simply fire your azz for cause, since you cost them $15M worth of losses. Nothing you can do for them moving forward can make up for that mistake , so they might as well give your job to the next in line upstart. He or she couldn't do any WORSE than you have.
-
Another helpful glimpse into the mind of KM and how he sees things.
I really am sad for this guy.
Note that this exchange above was pulled from a straightforward LENR thread. If anyone else around here wants to question my mental health for trying to steer newbies to LENR-CANR.org or to a thread where replications are nailed down, I'm all ears.
LENR Reviewed - Science or not??
Member
Likes Received743
4 hours ago
#7
JedRothwell wrote:
I am pleased to see the author looked at a wide selection of papers.
Did he give you a nod?
I noticed that he solicited advice from ECW before writing the article, and I actually sent him to one of the threads here (all about those 153 peer reviewed replications).
https://e-catworld.com/2019/02…eaders-about-lenr-papers/
But no one sent him to LENR-CANR.org and if he hasn't given newbies the nod to go over there, he has done a disservice.
He seems surprised that LENR papers are not allowed past the peer review process in the major journals.
-
Dewey started with the off topic comment about you kevmo, you responded, so I moved both here. I see now your first paragraph was on topic. If you want, just copy that part back to the thread.
-
Reminds me of red cells in gypsum.
-
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
-
it would be better to think of the fuel pill as one above the other and not side by side as a ?my reference"
Its then 3 focus points of release. Another thing ..the vague mention about protein reaction in a 2.4 .. things we would never think to put in a microwave oven do the damnedest things sometimes.
as references to the inner workings.
2 round cavities creating multiple center point with one of them feeding another magnetron ect..
May help to see the Principal relationship fundamental
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Please do not repeat old stuff.
-
Please do not repeat old stuff.
Most don't know the ingredients of mayonnaise ..~lol
-
Most don't know the ingredients of mayonnaise ..~lol
Still not a reason to post them repeatedly.
-
@clarifier Items posted here may have been moved from elsewhere - not this time perhaps, but bear that in mind.
-
For the point clarifier. I have invited certain groups to my posts.
Adding references to a device
Most of my posts are not necessarily intended for the up to date members.
-
Besides, calling it a grape without the video... I don't add everything in this forum~
-
Im sorry. Ascoli65 started this thread under false assumptions and it all went downhill from there. Please note that I didn't swear or make any reference to male bovine excrement. Damn. Now I did.
-
Just like Gennadiy Tarassenko cannon balls.. grape ...hematite fused magnetic focus point resonators. Seems we do a lo of talking but don't say much,
out in space or off the beach ~
-
-
Alan - where'd you find this?
Hi DW,
You are such a funny man. I honestly cannot imagine how the poor inventors that chose to work with you and the other "world saviours" feel when they read some of your posts. You are not even hiding it any longer. Keep it up!
JB
-
as Theranos
Theranos was worth $700 million
if only SOT had switched his specialty to medicine
the world could have been saved quicker
Why worry about pipsqueaks such as Rossi?
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.
CLICK HERE to contact us.