Also oil and gas, they can also pass the same charges, this is cold nuclear fusion!
The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.
-
-
Возьмите мою тему, в реакторе можно закрутить шаровую или микромолнию и мы получим новую энергию, почитайте мой форум, там все найдете.
-
They found that in an aqueous solution, negatively charged particles attracted each other and formed clusters, while positively charged particles repelled. However, in solvents that have an inverted dipole at an interface – such as alcohols – the opposite was true: positively charged particles attracted each other and negatively charged particles repelled.
Charge is a magnetic effect and in chemistry reactions are classified according minimal electronegativity. So a change in Ion structure leads to a stronger ion bond..., hence more flux that binds the charge.
Charge is only a good model e.g. for particles or very simple atoms. In all other cases charge plays more or less no direct role.
-
I'm not a chemist nor a mathematician this is why i often asked myself to know what generate inside nuclei this electronegativy behavior, do you have an idea a proposal ?
Charge is a magnetic effect and in chemistry reactions are classified according minimal electronegativity. So a change in Ion structure leads to a stronger ion bond..., hence more flux that binds the charge.
Charge is only a good model e.g. for particles or very simple atoms. In all other cases charge plays more or less no direct role.
-
I'm not a chemist nor a mathematician this is why i often asked myself to know what generate inside nuclei this electronegativy behavior, do you have an idea a proposal ?
In SOP potentials are equivalent to EM wave masses/structures. Basically charge - charge interaction is joining EM flux that settles on a new minimum. Obviously all 1+ nuclei have a different potential... In Lanthanides even 4+ can be less than 1+ in Hydorgen...
-
This is what science is thinking about these days.
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.And still you do not see the problem with this 'thinking'....?
You have earned the silver medal from me, After the gold medal winner THH, I am going to block you so that I simply do not have to read these silly ideas anymore. It will increase the forum's quality exponentially for me. -
The SAFIRE system produces heavy rare earth elements without the production of any neutrons at all. Also no gamma radiation is observed. The LENR theories must answer how could such a process work?
How do you know that? Simply because they aren't mentioned or detected doesn't mean there are none.
-
This is what science is thinking about these days
"Science" can't think. Scientists can, and I guarantee you they are not thinking what you are thinking. If you doubt me, then find one scientist who supports your nonsense.
-
If you doubt me, then find one scientist who supports your nonsense.
Live in a mirror cabinet...
-
Display More
For those who want to understand how the elements are produced by various astrophysical processes will be interested in this video
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.This video covers some interesting new research that is not commonly known: how rare earth elements are formed by the collision of two neutron stars.
https://www.theguardian.com/sc…forged%20in%20the%20event.
This neutron star merger produces massive volumes of neutrons that create heavy elements via R neutron capture.
The rapid neutron-capture process (r-process) is a nuclear astrophysical process that produces about half of the heavy elements in nature. The r-process is responsible for creating the most neutron -rich stable isotopes of each heavy element, including the heaviest four isotopes. The r-process involves a series of rapid neutron captures by heavy seed nuclei, with the nuclei not having time to decay before another neutron arrives to be captured. The r-process is called for to explain the production of stable nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars and in the solar system.
The r-process occurs when nuclei in the abundance peak centered on ⁵⁶Fe are captured. The r-process produces r-nuclei, whose abundance distribution shows peaks at mass numbers 80, 130, and 195. The p-process produces the rarer, more proton -rich heavy isotopes (the p-nuclei) that cannot be made by neutron capture.
Three candidate sites for r-process nucleosynthesis are low-mass supernovae, Type II supernovae, and neutron star mergers.
The SAFIRE system produces heavy rare earth elements without the production of any neutrons at all. Also no gamma radiation is observed. The LENR theories must answer how could such a process work?
Noop, this is utterly wrong, old and obsolete. Just a retold fantastical story that sound cool because it has big explosions in it..
Rapid capture of neutrons or protons cannot lead to heavier elements, The Beta decay steps do not allow that so easily,. First, the neutrons have a limit, meaning too many neutrons and they drift out of the nucleus, called the neutron drip line. second, the beta decay steps with the neutron heavy iron and such need time to decay, and your explosion in space in over in mere moments. Then the fact that neutrons decay rapidly, so there is never any time to do this. Elements heavier than iron will some day be recognized as being synthesized in-situ 'all over the place'. Study the decay steps, study the numbers of the elements and isotopes, study it and you will find out it cannot work this way at all (creating heavy elements).
We wrote about these topics in our book and explain this in more detail. So sad to see we are constantly having to start over again, because the r-process, exploding neutron stars, GR, black holes, EVO's creating new universes and destroying them... etc etc etc etc are simply erroneous thinking (well thinking..... fantasizing more like it) and so wrong it is not even funny anymore. BUT this is the 'accepted' truth and so some feel the need to refresh our minds with this gobbledygook that we are very much aware of.
BTW, you keep making statements about SAFIRE and their results and what not but you are simply utterly wrong, you know nothing about SAFIRE other than the public knowledge. That much is clear, and your statements and conclusions about the SAFIRE project are simply not supported by the SAFIRE team, they are wrong and strongly exaggerated. They do not make the claims you make, they do not explain it the way you do. Contact them with your great insights and see how far it gets you....
How it does work> ?
Well not going to tell you. -
How do you know that? Simply because they aren't mentioned or detected doesn't mean there are none.
The first product to be introduced by Aureon Energy is a nuclear waste remediation product that renders all radioactive isotopes into a stable state. It makes sense that any transmutation products that the SAFIRE system generates will be radioactive stable.
https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/25931-pasted-from-clipboard-png/
-
all radioactive isotopes into a stable state
"All." Are you are quoting Aureon. or misquoting Aureon?? or just. quoting yourself
All" A bit of a stretch.. C14. K40 are radioactive and quite. a few others..80. or so, in Nature
It would take years of experimentation to verify that each had changed into stable isotopes like K39. C12.
-
The first product to be introduced by Aureon Energy is a nuclear waste remediation product that renders all radioactive isotopes into a stable state. It makes sense that any transmutation products that the SAFIRE system generates will be radioactive stable.
Whatever happened to the other guys that wore lab coats like capes that made stable transmutation vitamins (clearly without Vitamin Neutron)?
-
The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO
There was no such discovery, and pair of monopoles is a dipole.
Instead the monopole turns
the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles
Gross!!! Don't be crude please..
Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
can't be sure at all of what one is talking about.Testability never stopped you from pontificating things as absolute truths before.
-
Currently Biberian's team produces greatly maximum 7 w xsh with 20grs of powder after 4 years of the fat Clean HME project.
Stay in your bed.
Display MoreUn message vieux de plusieurs décennies sur l'existence possible de monopoles dans les EVO comme suit :
De : "Jean-Paul Biberian" < [email protected] >
Date : 2013-08-11 17h45
Objet : CMNS : Rapport Defkalion : Monopôles magnétiques ?
À : < [email protected] >
Cc :
À tous,
Georges Lochack a prédit l'existence de monopôles magnétiques légers qui seraient des états de neutrinos excités magnétiquement. Ces monopôles ont été observés par Urutskoev lors de décharges de courant élevé sur de fines feuilles de titane dans l'eau. H a également observé la production de nouveaux éléments, notamment de cuivre. Ici aussi, les isotopes pairs du titane ont été impliqués dans la transmutation. Urutskoev explique l'emballement du réacteur de Tchernobyl par la création de monopôles magnétiques lors d'un premier accident électrique qui les a produits. Ensuite, les monopôles ont atteint le cœur du réacteur et ont fissionné l'U-238, ce qui explique pourquoi le réacteur de Tchernobyl avait un rapport U-235/U-238 élevé. Encore une fois, c'est le noyau pair (U-238) qui a été fissionné, et non le noyau impair (U-235).
Il est très possible que ce que Defkalion a mesuré ne soit pas un champ magnétique, mais l'interaction de monopôles magnétiques avec le détecteur. Les monopôles magnétiques pourraient également relier tous les autres équipements électroniques environnants.
Les articles relatifs aux monopôles magnétiques se trouvent dans les actes de l'ICCF 11.
--
Jean-Paul Biberian
Salutations
-------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------
Il a été observé que la réaction LENR favorise la transmutation des éléments de numéro atomique pair par rapport à la transmutation des éléments de numéro atomique impair. Par exemple, l'U238 est plus fissionné que l'U235. Ceci est cité par Urutskoev comme la cause de l'enrichissement observé de l'U235 par rapport à l'U238, comme on l'a vu lors de la fusion du réacteur de Tchernobyl. Ce processus d'enrichissement a été vérifié dans les expériences explosives de feuilles métalliques de titane de Georges Lochack.
