The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

  • Возьмите мою тему, в реакторе можно закрутить шаровую или микромолнию и мы получим новую энергию, почитайте мой форум, там все найдете.

  • They found that in an aqueous solution, negatively charged particles attracted each other and formed clusters, while positively charged particles repelled. However, in solvents that have an inverted dipole at an interface – such as alcohols – the opposite was true: positively charged particles attracted each other and negatively charged particles repelled.

    Charge is a magnetic effect and in chemistry reactions are classified according minimal electronegativity. So a change in Ion structure leads to a stronger ion bond..., hence more flux that binds the charge.


    Charge is only a good model e.g. for particles or very simple atoms. In all other cases charge plays more or less no direct role.

  • I'm not a chemist nor a mathematician this is why i often asked myself to know what generate inside nuclei this electronegativy behavior, do you have an idea a proposal ?

    Charge is a magnetic effect and in chemistry reactions are classified according minimal electronegativity. So a change in Ion structure leads to a stronger ion bond..., hence more flux that binds the charge.


    Charge is only a good model e.g. for particles or very simple atoms. In all other cases charge plays more or less no direct role.

  • I'm not a chemist nor a mathematician this is why i often asked myself to know what generate inside nuclei this electronegativy behavior, do you have an idea a proposal ?

    In SOP potentials are equivalent to EM wave masses/structures. Basically charge - charge interaction is joining EM flux that settles on a new minimum. Obviously all 1+ nuclei have a different potential... In Lanthanides even 4+ can be less than 1+ in Hydorgen...

  • Bob Greenyer has just understood how the EVO transmutes and distributes that reformed matter in detail by looking at the residue that has been produced in the failure of the Cavitation (sonofusion) reactor from B-J. Huang.


    One issue revealed in the analysis of current transmutation that has recently troubled me was how the transmuted material exited the EVO in seemingly ransom fashion and yet still managed to conform to the black hole theories that underpin Anti- De Sutter spacetime. There may be the reason to now suspect the possibility of the development within center the EVO of a magnetic singularity rather than a gravitational singularity. The data Bob explains show now this reformed material is released and broadcast and how the internal mechanisms inside the EVO also endure the failure conditions of EVO termination. There is lots of wonderful detail here.


    The Quark Gluon condensate matter digestion process seems to be supported by Bob's new data release and explanation. The creation and release of reformatted matter seems to occur at the end of the EVO lifecycle.

  • This is what science is thinking about these days.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

  • This is what science is thinking about these days.


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    And still you do not see the problem with this 'thinking'....?

    You have earned the silver medal from me, After the gold medal winner THH, I am going to block you so that I simply do not have to read these silly ideas anymore. It will increase the forum's quality exponentially for me.

  • For those who want to understand how the elements are produced by various astrophysical processes will be interested in this video


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    This video covers some interesting new research that is not commonly known: how rare earth elements are formed by the collision of two neutron stars.


    https://www.theguardian.com/sc…forged%20in%20the%20event.


    This neutron star merger produces massive volumes of neutrons that create heavy elements via R neutron capture.


    The rapid neutron-capture process (r-process) is a nuclear astrophysical process that produces about half of the heavy elements in nature. The r-process is responsible for creating the most neutron -rich stable isotopes of each heavy element, including the heaviest four isotopes. The r-process involves a series of rapid neutron captures by heavy seed nuclei, with the nuclei not having time to decay before another neutron arrives to be captured. The r-process is called for to explain the production of stable nuclides heavier than iron that are observed in stars and in the solar system.


    The r-process occurs when nuclei in the abundance peak centered on ⁵⁶Fe are captured. The r-process produces r-nuclei, whose abundance distribution shows peaks at mass numbers 80, 130, and 195. The p-process produces the rarer, more proton -rich heavy isotopes (the p-nuclei) that cannot be made by neutron capture.


    Three candidate sites for r-process nucleosynthesis are low-mass supernovae, Type II supernovae, and neutron star mergers.


    The SAFIRE system produces heavy rare earth elements without the production of any neutrons at all. Also no gamma radiation is observed. The LENR theories must answer how could such a process work?

  • The SAFIRE system produces heavy rare earth elements without the production of any neutrons at all. Also no gamma radiation is observed. The LENR theories must answer how could such a process work?

    How do you know that? Simply because they aren't mentioned or detected doesn't mean there are none.

  • Noop, this is utterly wrong, old and obsolete. Just a retold fantastical story that sound cool because it has big explosions in it..

    Rapid capture of neutrons or protons cannot lead to heavier elements, The Beta decay steps do not allow that so easily,. First, the neutrons have a limit, meaning too many neutrons and they drift out of the nucleus, called the neutron drip line. second, the beta decay steps with the neutron heavy iron and such need time to decay, and your explosion in space in over in mere moments. Then the fact that neutrons decay rapidly, so there is never any time to do this. Elements heavier than iron will some day be recognized as being synthesized in-situ 'all over the place'. Study the decay steps, study the numbers of the elements and isotopes, study it and you will find out it cannot work this way at all (creating heavy elements).

    We wrote about these topics in our book and explain this in more detail. So sad to see we are constantly having to start over again, because the r-process, exploding neutron stars, GR, black holes, EVO's creating new universes and destroying them... etc etc etc etc are simply erroneous thinking (well thinking..... fantasizing more like it) and so wrong it is not even funny anymore. BUT this is the 'accepted' truth and so some feel the need to refresh our minds with this gobbledygook that we are very much aware of.

    BTW, you keep making statements about SAFIRE and their results and what not but you are simply utterly wrong, you know nothing about SAFIRE other than the public knowledge. That much is clear, and your statements and conclusions about the SAFIRE project are simply not supported by the SAFIRE team, they are wrong and strongly exaggerated. They do not make the claims you make, they do not explain it the way you do. Contact them with your great insights and see how far it gets you....

    How it does work> ?

    Well not going to tell you.

  • How do you know that? Simply because they aren't mentioned or detected doesn't mean there are none.

    The first product to be introduced by Aureon Energy is a nuclear waste remediation product that renders all radioactive isotopes into a stable state. It makes sense that any transmutation products that the SAFIRE system generates will be radioactive stable.


    https://www.lenr-forum.com/attachment/25931-pasted-from-clipboard-png/

  • all radioactive isotopes into a stable state

    "All." Are you are quoting Aureon. or misquoting Aureon?? or just. quoting yourself


    All" A bit of a stretch.. C14. K40 are radioactive and quite. a few others..80. or so, in Nature

    It would take years of experimentation to verify that each had changed into stable isotopes like K39. C12.

  • The first product to be introduced by Aureon Energy is a nuclear waste remediation product that renders all radioactive isotopes into a stable state. It makes sense that any transmutation products that the SAFIRE system generates will be radioactive stable.


    https://www.lenr-forum.com/att…asted-from-clipboard-png/

    Whatever happened to the other guys that wore lab coats like capes that made stable transmutation vitamins (clearly without Vitamin Neutron)?

  • The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO introduces the possible existence of new nuclear processes catalyzed by these monopoles.

    https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/16/056/16056172.pdf

    MONOPONUCLEOSIS - The wonderful things that monopoles can do to nuclei if they are there.


    1. Mixing of deuteron triplet and singlet states

    2. Monopole nuclear matter

    3. Catalysis of spontaneous fission

    4. Catalysis of nuclear fusion (with implications for solar neutrinos)

    5. Enhancement of forbidden beta decays.


    Also the monopoles can possibly produce proton decay.


    https://iopscience.iop.org/art…0.1088/0034-4885/51/2/002

    Monopole catalysis of proton decay V A Rubakov


    The theoretical studies of the monopole catalysis of proton decay in grand unified theories are reviewed. Monopole catalysis, i.e. the ability of magnetic monopoles to induce nucleon decay at a strong interaction rate, is a non-perturbative quantum field theory phenomenon that incorporates the effects of the triangle anomaly and complex structure of the gauge theory vacuum and peculiar properties of fermions in the field of a monopole. This effect is of interest for experiment and astrophysics. By studying the properties of the Dirac equation in the background monopole field reveals that quantum mechanics fails in describing the fermion-monopole interactions. The quantum field theoretic treatment is possible within the s-wave approximation where only spherically symmetric fields are considered. The author reviews various techniques and results of the s-wave theory taking a toy SU(2) model and a realistic SU(5) grand unified theory as examples. He also discusses the corrections to the s-wave approximation and the model dependence of the catalysis.

    https://lss.fnal.gov/archive_n…ab-industrial-1985-01.pdf
    EXOTIC PARTICLE CATALYSIS

    Magnetic monopole catalysis is somewhat different than
    either muon or quark catalysis. One is no longer fusing two
    hydrogen nuclei together to extract something like four percent
    of the mass equivalent in energy. Instead the monopole turns
    the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles so
    that a fair fraction of the mass equivalent is available as
    energy (some part of the energy goes off as neutrinos that
    don't interact). How this catalysis could happen has been one
    of the more challenging puzzles of theoretical physics. It
    took years for the idea to be accepted and understood after it
    was first proposed by Callan and Rubakov. There is still some
    uncertainty about the rate at which it would occur but it is
    expected to be rather high. The cross section is
    velocity-dependent and increases as the monopoles slow down.
    Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
    can't be sure at all of what one is talking about. The process
    might not work or there might be blind alleys similar to the
    situation with muon catalysis.


    In any case one monopole can catalyze enormous numbers of
    protons and might provide about a milliwatt of power. (This
    number has already been calculated in astrophysical studies to
    set limits on monopole abundance in neutron stars. It is
    straightforward to scale it to earth-based densities.) A
    trillion monopoles could supply the power level of a gigawatt
    reactor while 10 ^10 monopoles would catalyze a fair part of the
    U.S. power needs. This should be compared to the number of
    free quarks needed of about 10^23. On the other hand, the
    necessary free quarks would weigh only 1 gram while the
    monopole charge would weigh five to ten tons since the
    monopoles are expected to be very heavy

  • The recent discovery of the production of a monopole pair inside the EVO

    There was no such discovery, and pair of monopoles is a dipole.

    Instead the monopole turns

    the proton into a quivering jelly of sub-atomic particles

    Gross!!! Don't be crude please..

    Since there are no monopoles available to run tests on, one
    can't be sure at all of what one is talking about.

    Testability never stopped you from pontificating things as absolute truths before.

  • A decades old message on the possible existence of monopoles in EVOs as follows:



    From: "Jean-Paul Biberian" <[email protected]>

    Date: 2013-08-11 5:45 PM

    Subject: CMNS: Defkalion report: Magnetic monopoles?

    To: <[email protected]>

    Cc:

    To all,

    Georges Lochack predicted the existence of light magnetic monopoles that would be magnetically excited states of neutrinos. Those monopoles have been observed by Urutskoev in high current discharges on thin titanium foils in water. H also observed the production of new elements, in particular of copper. Here too the even number isotopes of titanium were involved in the transmutation. Urutskoev explains the runaway or the Chernobyl reactor by the creation of magnetic monopoles in a first electrical accident that produced them. Then, the monopoles reached the reactor core and fissioned U-238, which explains why the Chernobyl reactor had a high U-235/U-238 ratio. Again, it is the even number nucleus (U-238) that was fissioned, not the odd one (U-235).


    It is very possible that what Defkalion has measured is not a magnetic field, but the interaction of magnetic monopoles with the detector. The magnetic monopoles could also each all the other electronics equipments around.

    The papers related to the magnetic monopoles are in the ICCF 11 proceedings.


    --

    Jean-Paul Biberian

    Regards


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    It has been observed that the LENR reaction favors transmutation of even atomic numbered elements over transmutation of odd atomic numbered elements. For example U238 is fissioned more than U235. This is sited by Urutskoev as the cause of the observed enrichment of U235 over U238 as seen the Chernobyl reactor meltdown. This enrichment process was verified in the exploding titanium metal foil experiments of Georges Lochack.

  • Currently Biberian's team produces greatly maximum 7 w xsh with 20grs of powder after 4 years of the fat Clean HME project.

    Stay in your bed.

    Edited once, last by Cydonia ().

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.