The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

Yet you say the current and all Rossi events are not a fiasco?

Ross says that his reaction is not cold fusion. He says that his energy source is the vacuum.

Read these two posts again and try to see the connection between Bose condensation and supersolids

Post

RE: The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

[…]

See the last few minutes in the LION experiment (see about 15:00): youtube.com/watch?v=nqAqhp2uR7k

EVOs excavate hexagonal profiled tunnels in diamond. EVOs project a hexagonal transmutation field.

This is caused by the lattice of vortexes that are formed by the superfluidic nature of the Bose condensate. These vortexes are the same as seen on the surface of the SAFIRE anode.

lenr-forum.com/attachment/22432/

For the science about this subject see

Supersolids
…

axil

Nov 16th 2022

Post

RE: The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

[…]

The production of polygon shaped vortex fields is call a supersoild and this applies to Bose condensates. It is an outgrowth called superfliuidity. I won't give you a reference because you will never read it. But for others who are interested

youtube.com/watch?v=hEbcYP5o_e0

axil

Nov 16th 2022

Here is an article that makes the hexagon connection

Study unveils a new supersolid phase in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates

Generally, matter exists in three distinct forms: as a solid, a liquid or a gas. Past physics research, however, has unveiled other curious states of matter,…

phys.org

Here is the WIKI that should help

Supersolid - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You can also google supersolid for more details.

You need to read and do some thinking. If you have any more trouble, I will give you more help.

Quote from Wyttenbach

So cold fusion now runs at (close of course) 0C ???

The SAFIRE system is a plasma based LENR system and it runs in the 100.000Cs or more.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Do you really understand anything. Bose = 0C....!

The maximum temperature that a Bose condensate can form is based on the mass of the objects that form the condensate. The polariton's mass is minimal if not zero. If fact, the polariton may have an imaginary mass. The indication that the Bose condensation temperature of the Bose condensate that forms the LENR reaction in the SAFIRE system is that those vortex bumps seen on the surface of the anode marks those dots as vortexes formed by a Bose condensate. The research done on SAFIRE so far has measured the temperature of each of the double layers that surround the the anode is about 100,000C. On some occasions, there are more than a dozen or more of these double layers that surround the anode so the combined temperature of all those layers is about 1,400,000C.

The takeaway in this observation is that the Bose condensate that actions the SAFIRE reaction is impervious to environmental conditions. This imperviousness to environmental conditions is understandable when we consider that the EVO can be formed using a spark whose temperature can be as high as 30,000C.

This barrier to environmental conditions is a clue to the nature of the EVO. As a false vacuum, that vacuum state is partitioned off from our environment (aka our vacuum or the true vacuum) by a domain wall that is impenetrable.

Domain wall - Wikipedia

A domain wall is a type of topological soliton that occurs whenever a discrete symmetry is spontaneously broken. Domain walls are also sometimes called kinks in analogy with closely related kink solution of the sine-Gordon model or models with polynomial potentials. Unstable domain walls can also appear if spontaneously broken discrete symmetry is approximate and there is a false vacuum.

It is expected from cosmology of the early universe that a false vacuum would be partitioned off from the true vacuum if such a false vacuum ever formed. This case was expected to have occurred when the Higgs field first came into existence during the evolution of the early universe.

The way that the EVO looks like an indestructible object might one day show that the physics of the domain wall is correct.

Another like observation that bares upon the nature of the indestrutable nature of the EVO as follows:

Note: Chukanov call the EVO a quantum macro object

US6936971B2 - Methods and systems for generating high energy photons or quantum energy - Google Patents

Methods and systems for generating high energy photons or quantum energy

Another unique characteristic of the quantum macro object is its nucleus. It is believed by the inventor that the nucleus is a two-dimensional object because a quantum material object can only be in a “closed two-dimensional formation.” The proton (nucleon) component of the quantum macro object is “open to the outside.” It has a sharp line of demarcation separating this two-dimensional object from the surrounding environment.

During some experiments, the quantum macro object was touched with a metal stick. In this experiment, the metal stick could not penetrate into the nucleus because the nucleus possessed no volume. Instead, the nucleus was deformed by the metal stick. Thus, the quantum macro object behaved like a solid. During these experiments, the dimensions of the surface of the nucleus did not change either. The quantum macro object nucleus is “closed to the inside,” therefore, no macro-material formation can penetrate through the quantum surface.

The nucleus of the quantum macro object is also impermeable to electrical current. In one experiment, a rather weak high voltage current (in some experiments: U=15,000 volts, I=0.01 amps) was used to create an arc discharge between two electrodes. Instead of penetrating the nucleus and taking the shortest route between two points (the electrodes), the electrical current traveled around the nucleus of the quantum macro object, thus sort of “sliding” along the surface of the nucleus.

Several experiments have led the inventor to formulate many beliefs about the quantum macro object. First, the quantum macro object is a giant macro atom composed of a two-dimensional quantum nucleonic nucleus and a three-dimensional electronic shelf. Second, the quantum macro object is an unusual material object behaving much like a material point in space. On the quantum surface of this two-dimensional material body, there are no differentiated points or areas. Third, the nucleus of the quantum macro object is a closed two-dimensional material formation, which can be deformed without changing the volume of the surface. Fourth, it is not possible to create the quantum macro object between two closed surfaces (like ordinary plasma). Fifth, the surface of the nucleus of the quantum macro object is much like a mirror in which every particle can see its counterpart.

Quote from Rjzk

In spite of the hard critiques against Axil's ideas about EVOs, are there any alternatives ?

Egely calls them macro quantum objects, but that's just a name.

How an EVO is formed and what prevents it from exploding immediately?

If I understand there isn't a single theory, mainstream or rebel, that allows a combination

of negative charges tied together to be kept as a cluster.

It would be nice to hear if there is any better explanation available.

And even better would be if the theory could also tell where the excess energy comes from e.g. in the Egely's device.

Or is it fusion with the help of plasmoid (=EVO) as Egely himself thinks about it.

Display More

Elegy believes as I do that the macro quantum object (Note: Chukanov calls the EVO a quantum macro object) is a Polariton Bose condensate. I posted his books about this belief early on this thread. But here again as follows:

http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part1.pdf

http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part2.pdf

http://www.egely.hu/letoltes/Fusion-by-Pseudo-Particles-Part3.pdf

The EVO is a false vacuum that is metastable. If a domain wall did not segregate and protect the EVO from the true vacuum(our universe) then the EVO would transmute the entire universe into pure energy.

The polariton is a photon that gets a new nature from the electron quantum mechanically. This new quasiparticle is what the EVO is made out of.

When the EVO's life cycle ends, it releases its energy in a Bosenova. This energy comes from the vacuum because that is what the EVO is.

In the bottom right hand corner, a picture of an EVO produced by the Vega experiment showing an EVO from top view (above) and possibly for the first time, an EVO and its vorticial core field from the side (below).

The substrate is a SiO2 tube. The tail of the magnetic vortex tube on the right is on a tight radii of the SiO2 tube as can be seen from the change in focus clarity. The vortex beam is lifting off the surface of the SiO2 tube due to the circular curvature of the glass tube. The interaction area of the magnetic vortex beam with the surface of the glass tube is also being reduced in its width. The vorticial beam may be longer but the intersection with the glass becomes less as the beam lifts off the surface of the rounded glass tube.

The polariton circulation is seen at the left intersection of the vortex tube. Since the EVO has two polariton interlaced circulations, one for right handed electrons and another collocated for left handed electrons, a minor magnetic vortex tube is seen projecting to the left of the combined circulations.

The minor magnetic vortex flux tube is produce by symmetry breaking through the action of the Kerr effect.

See for details

https://phys.org/news/2017-01-…-optical-microcavity.html

Physicists have observed spontaneous symmetry breaking in a petal soliton that generates its own optical microcavity. Experimenters have demonstrated experimentally the emergence of spontaneous symmetry breaking in this ultrahigh-Q whispering-gallery microresonator. The Optical whispering gallery (WGW) microcavity is the structural topological form that the Surface Plasmon Polariton assumes in LENR. . These whispering gallery modes are analogous to the acoustic resonances in the whispering gallery in St. Paul Cathedral in London.

A critical clue to the role of symmetry breaking in LENR is the observation that the application of an electrostatic field catalyzes spontaneous symmetry breaking in the WGW via the Kerr effect.

The result of the application of the Kerr effect is the production of a magnetic monopole where the power of one of the polariton circulation is transferred to the other circulation. But some residual circulation remains as seen in the side facing EVO image above.

The result of the application of a KERR stimulus is a monopole where just a single rotating polariton current remains. This current is an amplified sum of the initial double counter rotating polariton currents. The chiral handedness of the two counter rotating polariton currents also merge into a single much more amplified polariton current.

In more detail, it looks like the index of refraction of the vacuum changes under the influence of EMF.

This idea is the basis for the activation signal in the LENR reaction. The nature of the vacuum that the polaritons reside in is changed by B and/or E fields to induce a change of state in the circulation patterns of the polariton in the cavity. This is the KERR effect. This reorganization of polariton flow is what focuses the spin components of the polaritons into a monopole magnetic flux tube beam.

Quote from RobertBryant

zero K

Bose–Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter that is typically formed when a gas of bosons at very low densities is cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (−273.15 °C or −459.67 °F).

Wyttenbach is not current in his research into nanoplasmonics

In this post

Post

RE: The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

[…]

The maximum temperature that a Bose condensate can form is based on the mass of the objects that form the condensate. The polariton's mass is minimal if not zero. If fact, the polariton may have an imaginary mass. The indication that the Bose condensation temperature of the Bose condensate that forms the LENR reaction in the SAFIRE system is that those vortex bumps seen on the surface of the anode marks those dots as vortexes formed by a Bose condensate. The research done on SAFIRE so far…

axil

Nov 17th 2022

I said this:

Quote

The maximum temperature that a Bose condensate can form is based on the mass of the objects that form the condensate. The polariton's mass is minimal if not zero. If fact, the polariton may have an imaginary mass.

From far back in November 2016 as follows:

Polariton condensates at room temperature

We review the recent developments of the polariton physics in microcavities featuring the exciton–photon strong coupling at room temperature, and lead…

www.sciencedirect.com

Quote

We review the recent developments of the polariton physics in microcavities featuring the exciton–photon strong coupling at room temperature, and leading to the achievement of room-temperature polariton condensates. Such cavities embed active layers with robust excitons that present a large binding energy and a large oscillator strength, i.e. wide bandgap inorganic or organic semiconductors, or organic molecules. These various systems are compared, in terms of figures of merit and of common features related to their strong oscillator strength. The various demonstrations of polariton laser are compared, as well as their condensation phase diagrams. The room-temperature operation indeed allows a detailed investigation of the thermodynamic and out-of-equilibrium regimes of the condensation process. The crucial role of the spatial dynamics of the condensate formation is discussed, as well as the debated issue of the mechanism of stimulated relaxation from the reservoir to the condensate under non-resonant excitation. Finally the prospects of polariton devices are presented.

Quote from RobertBryant

" a large binding energy"

what is the range of the " large binding energy"

..0- 1 meV?

0-1 eV?

0-1 KeV?

My guess would be in the meV range.

Quote from Wyttenbach

Polaritons,excitons etc.. are not particles and hence do not have a mass. You can always give a mass equivalence relation for a measured force.

But talking of a BEC is simply misusing well defined terms.

You can form a BEC at very high T inside a closed cavity as the real BEC depends also on pressure. Inside a cavity pressure disappears for e.g. H/D as this tends to attach to the wall and finally condensates.

But at the end H/D form out spin matter or with a proper catalyst clusters of H*/D* appear which have nothing common with a classic BEC which definition is based on a wrong assumptions anyway.

Display More

In my opinion, LENR has nothing to do with particles directly. It is a reaction based on fields and potentials that are formed by particle movements and interactions. For example, a laser can produce transmutation when a laser shines on the surface of palladium, a laser can produce the reaction using nanoparticles. The laser induces particle movements that generate the fields that produce the reaction.

A system like SAFIRE can produce the reaction uses any number of gases without the production of pressure or heat. The reaction is based on the condensation of the dressed electrons on the surfaces of the cathode and anode. The electron become synchronized and form a single wave function. This single wave function is what a condensate is. But the electron must join with a boson to become a boson. The photon is that partner. But that boson could be the waves in a plasma (plasmon) or the vibrations in a metal (phonon).

Superconductivity is produced when two electrons come together to form a boson. Those cooper pairs become a condensate.

The Vega experiment which is a takeoff on the SAFIRE system produces transmutation in air by only using movements and interactions of particles. There is no pressure or temperature involved, its all in the way many particles interact and move. Coherence of these particle waveforms in these particles are what condensation is. Its all in the way particles dance.

Quote from RobertBryant

" a large binding energy"

what is the range of the " large binding energy"

..0- 1 meV?

0-1 eV?

0-1 KeV?

An electron volt corresponds to a temperature of 11,000C. So a meV corresponds to 11C. When they say in the articles that the binding energy is 8 meV, doesn't that mean that the temperature must be 88C before the binding is broken?

Titanium Disintegrates When Heated with Ohmasa Gas - Bob Greenyer of MFMP (6-13-2019)

Bob Greenyer attempts to burn a hole in teflon with Ohmasa gas, which proves very difficult. After not being satisfied that the hole produced was due to high heat, he attempts to heat a piece of titanium with Ohmasa gas until glowing to cut a slit in the teflon with the glowing titanium. He not only finds that he cannot make a significant cut into the teflon but the titanium actually develops a hole on the heated edge which touched it. Bob thinks that this reaction was due to the introduction of carbon from the teflon to the titanium after exposure to Ohmasa gas.

---------------------------------------------------

In polariton formation, the metal surface that the polaritons form onto must be insolated with a dielectric. This is why hydrogen plays a part in the LENR reaction. Hydrogen is a dielectric. Also carbon is a pore electrical conductor.

When the Teflon is applied to the titanium, the polaritons are increasingly well contained and are amplified so that the polariton condensate(EVO) gains energy. The same polariton amplification effect occurs when the carbonized Teflon is applied to the 10 yen coin.

The LENR reaction is an electrical surface effect that does not occur on a dielectric surface. In the video, the Teflon is not affected by the LENR reaction.

Even though the titanium and 10 yen coin glow white hot, both their temperatures are below the boiling point of water. Yet these metals are vaporized. This is caused by the disruption of the electrons holding the metal lattices together as well are the disrupted vacuum based destruction of matter.

All the while no energy is produced in this process except for the production of photons generated by the metals.