The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

    Axil, I would heartily recommend you contact the primary author of this paper to communicate your interpretation of her groups work.

    You seem to have additional information they are not yet privy to. Rather than posting here, it would be more direct to contact those people better able to understand your work.

    Here is her reseachgate page with the contact option:

    Claire MICHEL | Professor (Assistant) | PhD | University of Nice Sophia Antipolis, Nice | UNS | Laboratoire de Physique de la Matière Condensée (LPMC) | Research profile (researchgate.net)

    Please let us know how she responds to your revelations.

    The EVO is the only system that might be generating negative energy, so it is reasonable to try to see if the EVO can meet all the requirements of negative mass cosmology.

    https://theconversation.com/bi…-research-suggests-107922

    Some of the predictions of negative mass cosmology has been observed in resent observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES) as described in this video:

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    Dark energy is a dynamic thing that can change over time. So there must be some flexible mechanism that is producing Dark Energy as time goes by.

    The EVO is a possible multi phase source of dynamic dark matter/energy creation. By multi phase source, I mean that the EVO can be created in any number of ways, from production of EVOs in a hot plasma to the production of EVOs in the coldest temperatures in space.

    This flexible mode of EVO production makes the dynamic temperature dependent creation of dark matter/energy feasible.
    The Nobel prize winner Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, has defined what the dark matter/energy field is. He believes that it is a condensate of gluons which when applied to the EVO makes a good fit. Such an insight can make the inner workings of the EVO more visible to analysis.

    More details to come about how Ken Shoulders' beliefs about the EVO as the source of how dark matter and energy can find perches in current day science and cosmology in upcoming posts.

    Another dark matter video about Jamie Farnes theory of negative mass cosmology. What the Farnes theory is missing is a negative energy/mass particle, but we have that in the EVO.

    The Farnes theory as follows:

    https://www.aanda.org/componen….1051/0004-6361/201832898

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    This paper describes the experimental work done by Ferdinand Claude of the Kastler-Brossel Laboratory (LKB) of Sorbonne University, France to characterize the "ghost branch" of the dispersion of Exciton-polaritons. It is this photon field that can remove the virtual particles from the vacuum by using distrutive interference inside an EVO to make the EVO a negative energy structure (anti de-Sutter spacetime (AdS)).


    https://physics.aps.org/art...

    Quantum Fluids of Light Come into Sharper View


    The section of the article that highlights the mechanism for negative photon production as follows:

    Quote
    In a superfluid, the Bogoliubov dispersion relation has two branches, one with normal dispersion and one with negative dispersion, also known as the ghost branch. The latter branch owes its name to the fact that it is very challenging to excite—and thus to observe. The exquisite sensitivity of the pump-probe setup has previously allowed the LKB researchers to overcome this experimental difficulty and find traces of this ghost branch in reflectivity measures of their cavity

    When an EVO absorbs matter, that matter seems to disappear. Where does that matter go, and why is the EVO unstable? Why does an EVO eventually explode in a Bosenova? If the EVO was stable according to vacuum decay, it would keep eating matter until all the matter in our galaxy was inside the EVO. What causes the EVO to stop growing?

    The reason for all this strange behavior of the EVO is called "the instability conjecture".

    The AdS instability conjecture is a conjecture about the initial-boundary value problem in general relativity. It provides an example of weak turbulence appearing in the dynamics of the Einstein equations.

    The non-supersymmetric AdS instability conjecture can point to how quantum gravity removes the initial Big Bang.

    A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein-massless Vlasov system in spherical symmetry has been established.

    The numerical study of this conjecture in the simpler setting of the spherically symmetric Einstein-scalar field system was initiated by Bizón and Rostworowski.

    A rigorous proof of the AdS instability conjecture in the simplest possible setting has also been provided.

    A proof of the instability of AdS for the Einstein--null dust system with an inner mirror
    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1704.08681.pdf

    An understandable explanation of the instability conjecture is found here:

    New Math Proves That a Special Kind of Space-Time Is Unstable
    https://www.quantamagazine.org…ime-is-unstable-20200511/

    Einstein’s equations describe three canonical configurations of space-time. Now one of these three — important in the study of quantum gravity — has been shown to be inherently unstable.

    The proof involves injecting a small bit of matter into the space-time, akin to dropping a stone into a pond. Waves ripple out and back, interacting in a way that eventually creates a black hole.


    https://d2r55xnwy6nx47.cloudfront.net/uploads/2020/05/AdS-Black-Hole_2500_Lede_v02.mp4

    Quote

    Here’s the proof of instability: Moschidis showed that when he adds even a minuscule amount of matter to an AdS space-time, a black hole (or black holes) will inexorably form. However, AdS space-time has, by definition, uniform curvature everywhere, which means it cannot harbor space-contorting objects like black holes. “If you perturb AdS space-time and wait a sufficient time,” Moschidis said, “you’ll end up with a different geometry — one that contains black holes — and it’s no longer AdS. That’s what we mean by unstable.”



    In a nutshell, the final result of the EVO lifecycle is the production of a micro sized black hole that causes the EVO to terminate. The next question is where do all these black holes go and why can't we detect them? It sounds like a WIMP to me.


    An alternative to your view is presented by Matsumoto and expounded by me. Small ball lightening radiates electrons and itonic neutron clusters (neutron stars) which explode (go supernova by throwing off an itonic net). The resulting Matsumoto blackholes are a source of particles much smaller than neutrons. The Matsumoto blackholes can be trapped at an interface of a film. Hence, they are sources of energy to develop images in the film. Given that the blackhole image originate from cluster of neutrons and such cluster have countable numbers of neutrons and blackholes can only radiate until they have no mass/energy left, then the diameter of the image must correlate to a countable number of neutrons (mass/energy units). I measured the images and did the correlation. The images correlate to small integers with 99.9% correlation. I am fairly sure I have shared a graph of that correlation in this forum.


    Matsumoto observed the micron size ball lightening tracks on film. These are double tracks (train tracks) reported by others from various cold fusion experiments. But in addition, Matsumoto also published images of hopping of energy sources on a film interface, images of itonic nets surrounding an energy source, images of itonic nets without the central energy source, and energy sources without the itonic net. Simple observation reveals the images are not traces of high energy radiation but rather images developed from many dots (pixelated). Each image implies an energy source is focused from the interface of film to develop the image dot by dot.


    Matsumoto blackholes are not so massive that not even light can escape them. They get trapped by the electrostatic field at the interface of a film. Matsumoto blackholes do not absorb all the surrounding matter and grow until they consume the earth. Obviously, the gravity is not the same as universal gravity. What escapes to develop the image follows a path from the source to create a ring on the film. Since, the source must be a small number of "neutrons", the source is femtometers in size compared to the images in microns. Hence, the particle which develop the image must follow a path which is the same as if the particles where a spaceship escaping earth's gravity. That is to say, particles are ejected at a tangent to an escape orbit. Hence, one concludes that particles radiating from a Matsumoto blackhole are massive particles escaping a source of gravity.


    But what happens to the blackholes that don't escape the micron sized ball lightening? These can absorb various elements as the ball lightening makes tracks. So, the alternative to ball lightening being a blackhole/whitehole which consumes elements and spits out other elements is that ball lightening can acquire fentometer sized blackholes/whiteholes as part of itself which accomplish the transmutation effect which has been observed by various experiments.

    Inside of an EVO, the state of the fields there do not permit protons and neutrons to exist. For example, the Higgs field is not present inside the EVO. Absorbed elements and their particles fall apart into their more fundamental constituents. When matter is absorbed into an EVO, that nuclear matter is broken apart into unpaired quarks and gluons called a quark gluon plasma (QGP). These particles accumulate, mix, concentrate, and are confined at the center of the EVO due to the reflection of these particles off the spherical domain walls of the EVO.


    When the EVO terminates, this quark gluon plasma (QGP) freezes out back into protons, neutrons, and pions. Then these particles reform into various elements through hadronizing.


    This quark gluon plasma freezeout process seems random based on the amount of material ingested by the EVO, the type of elements ingested, the lifetime of the EVO, and other variable factors associated with QGP processes.


    Also gluon energy converts into hadrons during freezeout.


    Thumbnail


    Quark-gluon plasma (QGP) is a state of matter that fills the universe for a few millionths of a second after the Big Bang. The plasma is a soup of quarks and gluons, which are elementary particles that bind together to form hadrons like protons and neutrons.


    https://phys.org/news/2023-02-quark-gluon-plasma-production-energy.html

    Thumbnail

    .

    According to the Los Alamos National Laboratory, when the QGP cools down, it transforms into ordinary elementary particles when the QGP is once again exposed to ambient fields such as the Higgs.


    Quark–gluon plasma - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org

    Quote
    In the Big Bang theory, quark–gluon plasma filled the entire Universe before matter as we know it was created. Theories predicting the existence of quark–gluon plasma were developed in the late 1970s and early 1980s.[3] Discussions around heavy ion experimentation followed suit[4][5][6][7][8] and the first experiment proposals were put forward at CERN[9][10][11][12][13][14] and BNL[15][16] in the following years. Quark–gluon plasma[17][18] was detected for the first time in the laboratory at CERN in the year 2000.[19][20][21]

    The fantastic Theory of the Big Bang and the birth of matter in space-time arose from despair, from the limitations of the human mind, from the inability to explain the observed effects within the framework of the old scientific paradigm.

    This impasse can only be overcome in a philosophical and metaphysical way, namely by postulating the primacy and absoluteness of the non-mechanical movement of our single eternal absolute World.

    Our World was, is and will always be like this!

    I'm really confused now about the concesus about EVO's. Are they Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), or are they a new Universe? Or are they simply a room temperature superconducting BEC? Or are they an exiton polariton structure of anti de-Sitter space? Please, self proclaimed experts in EVO's, help me understand.

    Quote from PhysicsForDummies

    I'm really confused now about the concesus about EVO's. Are they Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), or are they a new Universe? Or are they simply a room temperature superconducting BEC? Or are they an exiton polariton structure of anti de-Sitter space? Please, self proclaimed experts in EVO's, help me understand.

    The EVO is a Exciton-Polariton Bose Einstein Condensate.


    The EVO is a spacetime that has a negative cosmological constant which is anti-de Sutter spacetime.


    The EVO is a spacetime that has a set of fields that differ from ambient spacetime in that the Higgs field is not active inside the EVO.


    Because there is no Higgs field expressed inside the EVO, any matter that enters the EVO decomposes into quarks and gluons.


    I am beginning to see the merit in the theory that our universe is a mix of both positive and sequestered negative vacuum states. The Negative state contribution is called the dark universe.


    The Dark Universe


    Quote

    The two largest pieces of the Universe, dark matter and dark energy, are the two that we know the least about, yet nothing less than the ultimate fate of the Universe will be determined by them. Dark matter tends to pull the Universe together, and dark energy tends to drive it apart. A full understanding of this cosmic struggle will require major observational and theoretical breakthroughs.

    The EVO may have a role in the dark universe. I will next post about my hypothesis that the EVO has a modified electroweak particle called the dark photon.


    Dark photon theory is a hypothetical theory about a particle that could help explain dark matter. Dark matter is a mysterious substance that makes up 85% matter in the universe, but remains invisible.


    The dark photon is the electroweak dual of the photon.


    Dark photons are also known as hidden photons. They are proposed to be a force carrier particle similar to the photon of electromagnetism, but potentially connected to dark matter.


    Dark photons are dark because they arise from a symmetry of a hypothetical dark sector. This sector is made up of particles that are completely neutral under the Standard Model interactions.


    Dark photons could be detected because of their kinetic mixing with the ordinary, visible photon. They could also interact with the Standard Model if some of the fermions are charged under the new abelian group.


    Dark photons could help explain why galaxies rotate faster than they should and why light bends around massive objects more than it should.



    Dark photon - Wikipedia
    en.wikipedia.org

    Dear young guard!

    Further one cannot achieve success by inventing new entities, be they dark or colored photons, rainbow particles, dark matter and dark energy, negative or positive vacuum states, “dark” hydrogen and a “square” or toroidal atom, and the like. On this path we have reached a dead end.

    You can get out of this dead end in a philosophical and metaphysical way, namely: By uniting all that exists into one single infinite absolute whole - our World. Then it will be necessary to admit that our World is absolutely non-mechanical, since it has nowhere to mechanically move. In our World, only non-mechanical internal motion is possible, such as birth and disappearance, synthesis and analysis of fermion-baryon matter, that is, material-neutrino-energy induction.

    Along this path, it is possible to solve the problem of cold nuclear fusion as a new source of carbon-free energy.

    Quote from Aleksandr Nikitin

    You can get out of this dead end in a philosophical and metaphysical way, namely: By uniting all that exists into one single infinite absolute whole - our World. Then it will be necessary to admit that our World is absolutely non-mechanical, since it has nowhere to mechanically move. In our World, only non-mechanical internal motion is possible, such as birth and disappearance, synthesis and analysis of fermion-baryon matter, that is, material-neutrino-energy induction.

    Your many comments seem to have been better expressed by dynamic theory. Exploring 5 Dimensions | The Dynamic Theory of Pharis Williams: A New View of Space-Time-Matter | by Observing The Anomaly | Predict | Medium

    Quote from PhysicsForDummies

    I'm really confused now about the concesus about EVO's. Are they Quark Gluon Plasma (QGP), or are they a new Universe? Or are they simply a room temperature superconducting BEC? Or are they an exiton polariton structure of anti de-Sitter space? Please, self proclaimed experts in EVO's, help me understand.

    After nearly 5 years of attempting to get an honest review of facts and models on this forum, I am convinced that there is no means to get consensus on this forum.


    What is called an EVO is boson condensed cluster of electrons. Electrons repel each other. Bosons act in coherent waves. Hence, if the boson actions are sufficiently strong, that "light" can condense a cluster of electrons. The strength or power of boson field is its energy. The energy of strongest component of boson field is defined by the Pharis Williams' phat equation. The phat equation defines the various quantum levels in the boson condensate. The equation is E= n2(energy of basic photon of exchange). In cold fusion the basic exchange frequency is about 13.6 eV, the ionization energy for hydrogen. One can show by modelling that phat equation and the basic photon of exchange predict Ed Storm amazing spectra of energies of deuterons emitted from glow discharge. If you really what to know just look at the numerous detailed mathematically and data-based posts, I have provided in this forum.

Subscribe to our newsletter

It's sent once a month, you can unsubscribe at anytime!

View archive of previous newsletters

* indicates required

Your email address will be used to send you email newsletters only. See our Privacy Policy for more information.

Our Partners

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.