Quote from Zephir_AWT

Oh come on, you already attempted for it multiple times here.

It seems quite clear that Curbina was referring to Twitter (where policies have changed since the Musk takeover).

Quote from Zephir_AWT

Which visitor of this forum actually agrees with this decision?

As far as I can see, the majority of LF members have never posted on this thread. But its prominence can, and will, be used as a stick to bash the forum, by people writing about it in other places.

To give an example; last year I wanted to find out a bit more about the MFMP, but a quick search turned up a post somewhere from someone who criticised it by saying the organisation was being run by a crazy antivaxxer.

This person had actually been favourable owards the concept of LENR, but having come across some of BG's posts about his refusals to accept vaccination, never bothered to look any further - and simply dismissed the entire MFMP as a crank outfit.

Now regardless of anyone's opinions on the various covid vaccines, or their views on government policies around the pandemic, or the people who have refused to comply with them, all these issues have nothing to do with LENR. It is a war that will continue to be fought elsewhere, and importing it into this forum serves no positive purpose.

Quote from Fm1

Just remember VITAMIN D IS THE KEY!!! Thanks again for giving me a place to help people make good choices.

Not only did I remember, I do it. Double-dosing every day - madame too.

Quote from Frogfall

It seems quite clear that Curbina was referring to Twitter (where policies have changed since the Musk takeover).

As far as I can see, the majority of LF members have never posted on this thread. But its prominence can, and will, be used as a stick to bash the forum, by people writing about it in other places.

To give an example; last year I wanted to find out a bit more about the MFMP, but a quick search turned up a post somewhere from someone who criticised it by saying the organisation was being run by a crazy antivaxxer.

This person had actually been favourable owards the concept of LENR, but having come across some of BG's posts about his refusals to accept vaccination, never bothered to look any further - and simply dismissed the entire MFMP as a crank outfit.

Now regardless of anyone's opinions on the various covid vaccines, or their views on government policies around the pandemic, or the people who have refused to comply with them, all these issues have nothing to do with LENR. It is a war that will continue to be fought elsewhere, and importing it into this forum serves no positive purpose.

Display More

People involved in Lenr have also avoided MFMP because of Bobs views. Just narrow minded people

Other venue for heated debate is the wide array of substack blogs. It has become so succesful that now twitter considers it competition and limits cross posting substacks for limiting audience escape to substack. Many of the substack blogs require subscription, but many also allow free access.

Quote from Fm1

People involved in Lenr have also avoided MFMP because of Bobs views. Just narrow minded people

Actually their original website is a problem. Not well-maintained at all.

Quote from Fm1

Just remember VITAMIN D IS THE KEY!!! Thanks again for giving me a place to help people make good choices.

No doubt, but some people like myself are sensitive to TOO much Vit D pills, and get heart palpitations if going over a certain IU. After 3 years of trial and error, I found my limit is 7,000 IUs/day. Maybe that is because I am outdoors so much? Who knows, but main thing is if you experience this, just take a few days off, then resume at a lower dose.

Quote from Shane D.

No doubt, but some people like myself are sensitive to TOO much Vit D pills, and get heart palpitations if going over a certain IU. After 3 years of trial and error, I found my limit is 7,000 IUs/day. Maybe that is because I am outdoors so much? Who knows, but main thing is if you experience this, just take a few days off, then resume at a lower dose.

I would suggest that you ask your primary care doctor to run tests on your cyp2 enzymes. palpitations happen often when rasing vitamin d levels and is not necessarily bad. It's atrial fibrillation that should be a concern, but check with your doctor and have those enzymes checked for alteration or mutation.

In the latest document dump from Pfizer comes this report of pregnant and lactating woman.

This is not good

End the COVID-19 Emergency and Forget About Long COVID--The Vaccine Injured, They Don’t Even Exist

End the COVID-19 Emergency and Forget About Long COVID--The Vaccine Injured, They Don’t Even Exist

TrialSite reported on how a major American health system essentially did a bait and switch, marketing a comprehensive long COVID program, with care navigators…

www.trialsitenews.com

TrialSite reported on how a major American health system essentially did a bait and switch, marketing a comprehensive long COVID program, with care navigators and the like, only to downgrade to a voice mail service with a handful of specialist options. Long COVID and vaccine injuries represent a growing problem outcome of the COVID-19 pandemic needing more investments in research and direct care which must include comprehensive chronic care management and care navigation services. With an estimated 16 million persons experiencing long COVID, and anywhere from 500,000 to 2 million persons struggling with COVID-19 vaccine-related injuries according to TrialSite estimates, one recent media suggested that these patients feel “swept under the rug.”

Multi-billion Intermountain Health Drops Long COVID Virtual Navigation Line—All But Disbands Care for Hundreds of Thousands of Utahns with Long COVID

Now is not the time to shut down dedicated long COVID centers and clinics, but that is exactly what Utah’s Intermountain Healthcare (IHC) has recently…

www.trialsitenews.com

Recently, the Lund Report done in conjunction with LAist, NPR, reported on the mounting crisis associated with long COVID patients being left to fend for themselves. This, despite over $1billion spent on COVID-19 research, driven by taxpayer sources, as reported recently by industry media STAT News.

The recent piece authored by Jackie Fortier is well intentioned and describes the pain and suffering three different long COVID patients must endure, leading to lost careers, broken marriages where they are dismissed and disbelieved by family and friends.

Going through the templatized process of deferring to an authority—the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the author cites the latest estimate that 6% of U.S. adults or 16 million or so likely struggle with long COVID symptoms. This is a group, however, so impacted that they struggle to carry out day-to-day activities, work and the like.

The author cites another 675-patient study by the University of Southern California’s COVID-19 Pandemic Research Center, finding that in Los Angeles County 46% of adults who contracted COVID fully recovered; the remaining 54% continued to struggle with issues, from brain fog to persistent cough, all adversely affecting daily life.

But there is no critical directive in this article—no scanning of how health systems are dropping the accountability of coverage—they did get paid lots of money from the federal government for COVID-19 cases after all, which was a redistribution of taxpayer and public-derived capital; or the billions in the aggregate that agencies from the National Institutes of Health to the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority to the Department of Defense spent on exotic therapeutic approaches targeting COVID-19.

Federal agencies indirectly targeted front-line physicians via medical societies and colleges for seeking to care for COVID-19 patients at the earliest signs of infection. One example this media routinely brings up is the ICAM protocol. A pharmacist at a Florida-based health system early on in the pandemic found a combination regimen using repurposed blood thinners, steroids and other medicine that made a material impact, saving lives early in the pandemic. What was the result? After TrialSite published an article gaining wide global circulation, the CEO of that health system shut the program down. Why? Because according to insiders, the health system has a contract with Pfizer to test the vaccine and that contract precluded.

It’s not clear what the impact had on the top-down controls of the pandemic and the federal national emergency, but there is a high probability that many lives were lost because of this response.

Also, while the Lund Report claims that it to be an “independent, nonpartisan, nonprofit” online news source, it, like most media outlets in the mainstream, lack the will and true independence to report on a gross injustice currently unfolding across America: the systematic avoidance of a material number of vaccine-related injuries as a result of the mass vaccination program. Over 270 million primary series vaccinations means that only a safety incidence rate of 0.005 leads to 1.3 million injured. This is a real problem that must be recognized, discussed and dealt with. Journalists for media outlets that systematically ignore such humanistic issues because it's not “safe” have lost their way.

So yes, long COVID patients are getting swept under the proverbial carpet while the COVID-19 vaccine injured as far as our government is concerned don’t even exist.

FDA: Licensed Vaccines Do Not Need to Prevent Infections or Transmission

FDA: Licensed Vaccines Do Not Need to Prevent Infections or Transmission

Recently, during the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) contemplated changes to the COVID-19 vaccine status, they elicited a commenting period. An organization…

www.trialsitenews.com

Recently, during the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) contemplated changes to the COVID-19 vaccine status, they elicited a commenting period. An organization called the Coalition Advocating for Adequately Labeled Medicines (CAALM) tracked by TrialSite filed a petition requesting that the agency update the COVID-19 vaccine product labeling –for both Pfizer and Moderna products—to reflect their actual safety and efficacy more accurately. The third entry was titled “Requests that the FDA require that the sponsors of Comirnaty, Spikevax, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccines (collectively, ‘Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines’) amend current product labeling.” While the principals behind CAALM are experts and offer the FDA valid points in their comments, the FDA flatly rejects the organizations requests, declaring that a licensed vaccine doesn’t need to demonstrate that they prevent infection or transmission nor does a vaccine authorized under provisional emergency use authorization need to demonstrate infection prevention or transmission.

Before delving into the FDA’s response, a brief reminder on the importance of CAALM. Led Linda Wastila, BSPharm, MSPH, Ph.D., a Professor and Parke-Davis Chair in Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, Department of Practice Sciences, and Health Outcome Research; Director of Research, also with Peter Lamy Center on Therapy and Aging, University of Maryland, TrialSite reported on the group’s first notable effort to pressure the FDA to modify the COVID-19 vaccine labels. See “University of Maryland Pharma Professor Introduces ‘CAALM’---for FDA Updates of COVID-19 Vax Labels for Transparency.”

Linda Wastila and others at CAALM are at it again. This time they are using their expertise in pharmaceutical product labeling to request that the regulatory agency modify the mRNA—based COVID-19 vaccine product labels more accurately to reflect the actual nature of the still investigational vaccine products.

A note here, the FDA in an unorthodox manner approved the vaccines—first, Pfizer by approving Comirnaty, yet keeping BNT162b2 (investigational) as the only vaccine in distribution.

TrialSite hypothesized on that move that the Biden administration sought to kill the proverbial birds with one stone—the action would generate more confidence in the market, thereby reducing any vaccine hesitancy while also providing the legal grounds for imminent forthcoming mandates at the federal and local levels (of course much of the federal mandate announced by Biden was tossed by the courts).

The FDA response

In a telling letter to the organization (CAALM), the FDA declared, “FDA authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission…Similarly, a vaccine can meet the EUA standard without any evidence that the vaccine prevents infection or transmission.

Call to Action: Check out the link for the entire FDA docket.

Regulations.gov

Quote from Fm1

In a telling letter to the organization (CAALM), the FDA declared, “FDA authorization and licensure standards for vaccines do not require demonstration of the prevention of infection or transmission…

A vaxxine must no be a vaccine just the name is enough.According current FDA definition "orange juice" is a vaccine and may be far superior to Pfizer's poison...

Kitasato University Preclinical Animal Models—Orally Administered Ivermectin Exhibits Robust Potential Against SARS-CoV-2

Kitasato University Preclinical Animal Models—Orally Administered Ivermectin Exhibits Robust Potential Against SARS-CoV-2

A prominent academic research center in Japan investigated the potential of the anti-parasitic, Nobel Prize associated drug Ivermectin with antiviral COVID-19…

www.trialsitenews.com

A prominent academic research center in Japan investigated the potential of the anti-parasitic, Nobel Prize associated drug Ivermectin with antiviral COVID-19 treatment options. Reported on by TrialSite earlier on during the pandemic, medical researchers at Kitasato University found at least some compelling evidence for ivermectin’s use against SARS-CoV-2, the virus behind COVID-19. Now the university’s Medical Center in Saitama Japan reports on the findings of a preclinical animal study published in the prominent journal Nature. This recent investigation evaluated the effects of the in vitro effects of ivermectin in a hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The results were quite promising.

Preclinical Lab Findings

The team represented by corresponding author Takayuki Uematsu Deputy Head of Laboratory, Kitasato Institute Medical Center Hospital reports that the oral administration of ivermectin before SARS-CoV-2 infection in the animal subjects linked to decreased weight loss and pulmonary inflammation. Moreover, Uematsu and team report:

“ …the administration of ivermectin reduced pulmonary viral titers and mRNA expression level of pro-inflammatory cytokines associated with severe COVID-19 disease. The administration of ivermectin rapidly induced the production of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies in the late stage of viral infection. Zinc concentrations leading to immune quiescence were also significantly higher in the lungs of ivermectin-treated hamsters compared to controls.”

Of course, this was only an animal study but TrialSite notes that the FDA justifies female rat studies as a basis for administration of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in pregnant women along with observational data associated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. See the FDA package insert for Pfizer’s Comirnaty section 8.1.

Lots of Data during the Pandemic

One site that tracks ivermectin studies reveals 203 ivermectin-based studies targeting COVID-19 since the onset of the pandemic. Of these C19IVM.ORG reports 96 of the studies involving 1,030 scientists and 135,554 patients across 27 countries demonstrate a statistically significant improvement for mortality, ventilation, ICU hospitalization, record, cases and vial clearance. Other studies listed evidence of prophylactic benefit.

TrialSite has reported on compelling real-world data involving use of ivermectin in combination with doxycycline for example in Uttar Pradesh India. An aggressive public health outreach campaign during the height of the Delta surge in India appeared temporally associated with phenomenal results. Sending pairs of health care workers villages and towns across India’s most populated state, they distributed home medicine kits which included ivermectin doses and doxycycline.

The effort was so successful that even the World Health Organization (WHO) touted the results in a press release. See “Uttar Pradesh: Going the Last Mile to Stop COVID-19.”

Not surprisingly the WHO in this important admission omitted the ingredients of the home medicinal kits. Health officials from Uttar Pradesh went on the record defending the use of ivermectin as a key ingredient for the successful program. Mainstream media at MSN showcased the positive results. A prominent physician also verified the results of the ivermectin use.

A similar effort was led in Mexico City by the public health apparatus in one of the world’s most populated cities. They reported positive results with use of ivermectin. These real-world programs didn’t collect extensive data so it cannot be claimed conclusively that these programs in fact helped reduce not only the severity of SARS-CoV-2 but also its transmission. Interestingly, however, in Uttar Pradesh the turnaround was dramatic. The Western press censored this news.

In the U.S. early on during the pandemic, the ICON real-world observational study showed positive results led by a husband and wife physician team at a health center in Florida. The results were peer-reviewed and published in the journal Chest.

Recently the French biotech MedinCell reported statistically significant benefits associated with their version of the drug targeting COVID-19. See "Ivermectin delivers statistically significant results against COVID-19, including Omicron in SAIVE trial.”

Importantly a handful of prominent studies sponsored by nonprofits and academic research centers however are used by regulators and public health agencies in the West to declare ivermectin’s lack of efficacy. Studies such as Together and COVID-OUT didn’t find compelling evidence for the benefits of ivermectin, but critics questioned some of the study design elements.

The general consensus among developed world medical establishments, regulators and apex research institutes is that ivermectin isn’t’ effective against COVID-19. The National Institutes of Health only recommends use of ivermectin targeting COVID-19 in clinical trials.

Japanese Interest but in Animal Models

These most recent results out of the Japanese university suggest that ivermectin may have efficacy in reducing the development and severity of COVID-19 by affecting host immunity in a hamster model of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Prophylactic administration of ivermectin attenuates SARS-CoV-2 induced disease in a Syrian Hamster Model - The Journal of Antibiotics

www.nature.com

Exploring the Possible Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines: Are Genital Ulcers a Concern?

Exploring the Possible Side Effects of COVID-19 Vaccines: Are Genital Ulcers a Concern?

While millions worldwide have received the COVID-19 vaccine and reported minimal side effects, concerns have been raised about rare and unexpected reactions.…

www.trialsitenews.com

While millions worldwide have received the COVID-19 vaccine and reported minimal side effects, concerns have been raised about rare and unexpected reactions. One of these is genital ulcers which generated significant interest, as genital ulcers can have a significant effect on a person’s quality of life. TrialSite has also reported skin-related side effects that may be related to the COVID-19 vaccine including the reactivation of the varicella-zoster virus, an eczema skin reaction, and skin diseases.

The American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) states that genital ulcers are usually seen due to sexually transmitted infections but may also be due to inflammatory diseases, trauma, or a bad reaction to skin care products. Risk factors included unprotected sex, uncircumcised male genitalia, and more than one sex partner. However, it is possible for inflammatory diseases that lead to genital ulcers to have a hereditary component.

One type of genital ulcer, the aphthous ulcer, was recently linked as a possible side effect of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Vulvar Aphthous Ulcer in an Adolescent After Pfizer-BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-19 Vaccination

Vulvar aphthous ulcers are a rare type of genital lesion most common in non-sexually active adolescents. Vulvar aphthous ulcers are typically associated with…

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Most common non-transmissible ulcer

Aphthous ulcers are lesions on the vulva, similar to “canker sores” you can get in your mouth but they are deeper and larger. Unlike other genital ulcers, this type of ulcer is acquired and is an uncommon, non-sexually transmissible genital ulcer.

While this type of ulcer is typically not considered an infection, with its etiology still unknown, certain viral illnesses such as influenza or Epstein-Barr virus may trigger their development. In these cases, the ulcers are thought to result from the stress that the infection places on the immune system, ultimately leading to the formation of ulcers.

Case studies: Adolescent girls develop genital ulcers after COVID-19 vaccination

TrialSite reported on adverse endocrine events (AEE) following COVID-19 vaccination. AEE areconsidered rare and with a benign outcome. thyroid alterations are the most common. In the report from March 17, 2023, a summary of entries for AEEs in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was included. The VAERS database was initially accessed on Dec. 20, 2022 for reports including all COVID vaccine manufacturers in the USA. The database was accessed for the second time on Feb. 23, 2023 to get the number of AEEs reported seven and fourteen days post-vaccination. The data shows several genital lesions including

Genital herpes reported 139 times

Genital rash reported 78 times

Genital ulceration reported 59 times

Genital lesion reported 21 times

Genital blister reported 18 times

Genital abscess reported 4 times

Genital ulcer syndrome reported 3 times

In comparison to the commonly reported adverse events (AE), these numbers might seem small. Some more common AEs are anaphylaxis (a severe allergic reaction), thrombosis (blood clotting), and myocarditis (inflammation of the heart).

The genital lesion most frequently reported after the COVID-19 vaccine was herpes, but herpes is also the most common misdiagnosis for aphthous ulcers. Because of this, the cases of vulvar aphthous ulcers post-COVID-19 vaccination may be unrecorded.

The report did not include an age bracket, but several case studies have been found on adolescent girls who presented with genital ulcers post-COVID-19 vaccination.

16-year-old female

The case was of a non-sexually active adolescent girl who developed genital ulcers within 24 hours of receiving her second dose of the Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. She was hospitalized two days post-vaccination and was diagnosed with vulvar aphthous ulcer six days post-vaccination.

However, it is also worth noting that the patient in the study had an extensive medical history that involved corrective surgeries for several congenital conditions. She also had a history of recurrent oral ulcerations. Even her family had a history of canker sores so severe they needed medical intervention.

Laboratory tests showed:

Negative evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA

Negative swab and blood test of the lesion for herpes simplex virus 1 and 2

Other STI tests were returned negative

An Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen antibody was found - an indication of previous infection with the virus.

The result shows a typical presentation of ulceration resulting from an inflammatory disease that can be triggered by an influenza-like illness.

12-year-old and 14-year-old female

The case report included the case of two adolescents who had received the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

Acute Genital Ulceration After Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccination and Infection

Reactive, nonsexually related acute genital ulceration, also known as Lipschütz ulcer, is a nonsexually related ulceration involving the vulva, most commonly…

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A 12-year-old. This patient presented with genital ulcers two days after receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Shewas otherwise healthy with no history of oral or genital ulcers, no sexual activity, and no autoimmune disease. All laboratory workups turned up negative. Findings were deemed to have been triggered by the COVID-19 vaccine.

A 14-year-old. This patient presented with genital ulcers three days after receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. She’d had a prior episode of genital ulcers several months before this presentation. All laboratory workups, including COVID-19 testing, were negative for both occurrences.

This patient’s genital ulcer recurred approximately 6 months later, 24 hours after testing positive for COVID-19.

13-year-old to 17-year-old female

The Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology reported three cases of genital ulcers following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination without COVID-19 infection.

https://www.jpagonline.org/article/S1083-3188(22)00153-X/fulltext

A 13-year-old female. This patient presented with genital ulcers one day after receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. She’d had one episode of genital ulceration in the past. The genital ulcer was positive for corynebacterium–bacteria that can cause respiratory and non-respiratory disease (diphtheria)–and negative for the rest of the laboratory workup.

A 14-year-old female. This patient presented with genital ulcers after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. She’d had one episode of herpes simplex virus (HSV)-negative genital ulcer in the past. The genital ulcer was biopsied and showed signs of chronic inflammation. The ulcer was negative for the rest of the laboratory workup.

A 17-year-old female. This patient presented with genital ulcers one day after receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The genital ulcer was positive for Staphylococcus aureus–bacteria that often cause skin infections–and negative for the rest of the laboratory work-up. EBV workup was not obtained by this patient.

14-year-old female

The case was of a non-sexually active adolescent girl who presented with genital ulcers two days after receiving the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

The patient’s medical history included heavy menstrual bleeding and Type I von Willebrand disease that required an extended cycle combination of oral contraceptives. The patient had no history and family history of genital or oral lesions. She tested negative for EBV and any other laboratory workup.

COVID-19 infection and vulvar aphthous ulcer

Aphthous ulcers have also been linked to COVID-19 itself. There were two case studies of COVID-19-positive patients who presented with vulvar aphthous ulcers who had no familial predisposition, no previous infection with EBV, and claimed not to have been exposed to sexual risk factors.

A 41-year-old woman presented with a 10-day history of dry cough and rhinorrhea, with a coinciding 5-day history of a genital ulcer at the time of consult. The patient tested negative for the rest of the laboratory work-up done. She came back one week later with a resolving genital ulcer but progressive respiratory symptoms and tested positive for COVID-19.

COVID‐19‐related acute genital ulcers

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

A 19-year-old adolescent girl presented with a vulvar aphthous ulcer two days after testing positive for COVID-19.

Vulvar Aphthous Ulcer in an Adolescent With COVID-19

Vulvar aphthous ulcers have been associated with various prodromal viral illnesses. We describe the case of an adolescent girl who developed vulvar aphthous…

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Worth looking into

COVID-19 vaccines have been reported to have several side effects that have raised safety concerns about the vaccines. More than the other vaccines, the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has been linked to a number of side effects ranging from common to rare adverse reactions post-vaccination, now including genital ulcers on the list.

Although many national organizations have endorsed vaccination and have encouraged 12-year-olds to 16-year-olds to receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, these case studies emphasize the need for more data and research into the adverse immune reactions after a COVID-19 mRNA-based vaccine.

Present reports and studies are aiming to look into the causal relationship between the COVID-19 vaccines and genital ulcers by conducting more studies and research. TrialSite will continue to monitor emerging cases of adverse events following a COVID-19 vaccination.

Quote from Fm1

The Vaccine Injured, They Don’t Even Exist

A few deaths definitely exist though

will the health authorities be held accounatble?

Class actions in Australia and the UK..

Not with a bang but a lawsuit | The Spectator Australia

Dr Barry Schultz was a highly respected paediatrician, surgeon and obstetrician in Adelaide. He was also a Covid vaccine skeptic. He was not opposed to…

www.spectator.com.au

BBC star's husband taking legal action after death from rare jab complications

The husband of BBC presenter Lisa Shaw, who died at the age of 44 from rare complications following her first Covid jab, is part of a group of claimants who…

www.mirror.co.uk

iThe React19 Scientific Publications & Case Series Database

The React19 Scientific Publications & Case Series Database

A nonprofit patient advocacy group dedicated to persons injured by COVID-19 vaccines launched what is likely the world’s largest database of studies,…

www.trialsitenews.com

A nonprofit patient advocacy group dedicated to persons injured by COVID-19 vaccines launched what is likely the world’s largest database of studies, primarily case series/case reports, tracking various serious adverse events and associated injuries associated with COVID-19 vaccines. A valuable resource for researchers investigating various serious adverse events potentially linked to the COVID-19 vaccines, TrialSite estimates that between approximately half a million and 2 million persons in the United States alone struggle with health conditions potentially linked to the vaccines. While serious adverse events are rare with the COVID-19 vaccines, an unprecedented mass vaccination at scale occurred over the past couple years. In the United States alone, over 270 million people received primary series alone.

The database came together as part of a collaboration with React19, Aaron Hertz, TrialSite, and CrossTx. See a recent press release that covers some of that collaboration.

The World’s Largest COVID-19 Vax—Serious Adverse Event Repository

The repository consists of a collection of over 3,400 peer-reviewed case reports, case series, and other studies across 24 general health categories citing adverse effects post-COVID-19 vaccination. React19 co-founder Brianne Dressen sponsored the database, as researching COVID-19 vaccine-related adverse events can be daunting, at least in part, due to the broad myriad of factors involved.

Most challenging is the actual search for these studies. They are published and uploaded across multiple publishing platforms around the world. Given the government not only mandated the COVID-19 vaccines but also set up the conditions to pressure various institutions, organizations and companies across American society to include vacation as part of employment, for example, adverse events were to be expected and such an initiative should have been funded and supported by the government itself.

The ever-growing list of peer-reviewed studies specific to COVID-19 vaccine adverse events is curated and maintained by React19 staff, which includes researchers with Ph.D.s who also happen to be COVID-19 vaccine injured.

TrialSite announces the React19 Scientific Publications & Case Reports database for medical/health researchers and other professionals interested in learning more about this growing problem. Of course, not all of the injuries tracked in the case series/case report studies are definitively linked to the vaccines.

What follows are the top five therapeutic area by number of studies/reports listed:

Topic

# of Studies

Neuro

628

Dermatology

539

Cardiac

432

Thrombolytic/Thrombocytopenia

402

Rheum/Endo/Ortho

212

To visit the React19 Scientific Publications & Case Reports database simply follow the link.

If you believe that you have been injured by the COVID-19 vaccine, visit and reach out to React19.

If you are a provider or attorney seeking resources for your patients visit here.

https://covid.crosstx.com/

UK:: Excess mortality disappears again. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplep…nal/weekending14april2023

Switzerland is at the low end of expected deaths. :https://www.experimental.bfs.a…n/home/projects/momo.html Bur for one year it was far above for Age > 64

Don’t Let Them Rewrite the Pandemic

Don’t Let Them Rewrite the Pandemic | National Review

Anthony Fauci and Randi Weingarten try to revise the past.

www.nationalreview.com

The Covid-19 pandemic ravaged the elderly and the sick in this country. It inspired or terrified us into huge social, governmental, and economic experiments. “Lockdown” stopped being just prison jargon. We have long since entered an appropriate period of reflection and investigation. Fights about masks, social-distancing, quarantines, and closures of churches, parks, and other amenities disfigured the normal rhythm of human life, marring funerals and delaying weddings. We are now uncovering years of learning loss and missed developmental milestones in children who were deprived of needed socialization, structured play, and face-to-face learning for speech development

These particular maladies and the way America was an outlier in them are at the feet of our institutions and their leaders. Which is why they are lying so much about their records.

Lee Fang expose.. Pfizer financed vaccine mandate lobbyists

you know concerns around vaccine mandates uh similarly became polarized

..you were condemned as a racist or you know extremist or  anti-vaxxer

NOT on LF!... not much "antivaxxer" polarizing there...

except for one circuitolgist .. 37/60 antivaxxer posts

Search Results - LENR Forum