Posts by bang99

    Aha, here is the JONP explanation (emphasis added):

    • Fred June 2, 2019 at 2:14 PM

      Dr Rossi:

      Your paper on Researchgate is important: Researchgate is the sole scientific publication whose peer reviewing is made democratically, in open source and this is the reason why the New York Times considers it one of the most important scientific carriers. As a matter of fact, a publication on Reseachgate is peer reviewed from all the scientists, professors, researchers that read it and they express their opinion on the publication freely. Your publication is very difficult to understand and it is restricted to nuclear physicists, so a full reading is very heavy. The statistics are rigidly controlled from the moderators, so that the result of the peer reviewing is there, clear and undisputable. Hundreds of full readings for one nuclear physics publication in one year are considered a successful peer reviewing. You got 22 300 and counting in less than 5 months.

      Congratulations, this is not a success, this is a revolution in the making.

      All the best,

      Fred


    But, wait:

    As a matter of fact, a publication on Reseachgate is peer reviewed from all the scientists, professors, researchers that read it and they express their opinion on the publication freely.

    For the normal stuff, but not he Rossi stuff:

    [...] Your publication is very difficult to understand and it is restricted to nuclear physicists, so a full reading is very heavy.

    Someone like Josef M. Gaßner (German astronomer, mathematician, physicist) is RESTRICTED, because he is no nuclear physicists?!

    He is part of the "Urknall, Weltall und das Leben" team, running a YouTube channel( >100.000 abo's), capable of explaining all mainstream theories from "Aristoteles to Stringtheorie" in now 45 episodes...

    ... is RESTRICTED?!


    I don't get that ...

    JoNP sockpuppets to the RESCUE!

    "They" are surely reading here on LF, the above post on JoNP is a is clear reaction to my and other posta :-)


    Oh, I forgot, ONLY nuclear physicists on Planet Rossi are ALLOWED in that E-Cat stuff.

    Like the ERV (a Rossi invention for "Expert Responsible for Validation").

    Penon! How is the weather there in the Dominican Republic?

    :/

    Steven N. Karels
    June 1, 2019 at 6:16 AM

    Dear Andrea Rossi,

    It seems that you are pursuing a commercial path that provides a service, the generation of heat and possibly electricity, without clearly demonstrating the technology behind the service. You have done demonstrations that show the effect but these are subject to criticisms.

    Can you clearly tell us why the following could or should not be done? Using one of your mature technologies, run an eCat reactor that produces enough thermal energy to heat low efficiency electrical power converters to produce electricity, conduct the electricity to a battery, invert the battery power to AC power and use the AC power to run your controller unit. Suspend this on non-conducting cables (so it is not sitting on anything and cannot be secretly powered) and power a light and let it run for some long period of time with free inspections by independent observers – look but do not disassemble/touch. Perhaps boil water with the waste (unused) heat. If it continues a sufficiently long period of time to exclude a chemical means of energy generation, you would prove the technology to the public. The scientific community would take notice but would remain skeptical until they did replications/independent testing. But business people are not scientists.



    Andrea Rossi
    June 1, 2019 at 7:58 AM

    Steven N. Karels:

    Thank you for your opinion.

    Warm Regards,

    A.R.




    Steven, keep on asking for it!

    I'm not certain about ResearchGate but on many social apps including Twitter, facebook and Instagram, you can buy clicks, as many as you want, for not much money. [...]

    Shure, you can buy "clicks" aka "page requested from client <IP>: counts as "page visited"

    You can also buy/count "Document requested for download from client <IP>: counts as "doc downloaded"

    That's all countabe!


    But: "Full readings" is IMHO something you can't count.

    You simply can not measure, if an entity realy reads a page or a downloaded document.


    Yes, zorud, that's what I'm asking sam12


    And now:

    What is "Full Readings" please?!

    How is that measured?!

    Can someone please explain that?

    Sam, thank you for the feedback.

    I was asking about your opinion about all that "One Time Posters" on JoNP, not the usual and frequent posters.

    It was posted as a follow up to Colin Waters original Post on Steven N. Karels comment on Rossi blog.

    Steven seems like a smart guy.

    What is your opinion about him.

    Sam, Steven is a regular poster on JoNP since years.

    And he is the one who was asking Rossi about self sustain, e.g. powering the system with an accumulator, charged by the output of the Cat.

    Rossi's anwsers to that simple question, in the past, were redicoulous. But Steve asked again several times.

    What I can say, he is IMHO not sockpuppet.

    Is he smart?

    Dunno. How to define that?

    He is a IMHO a believer or better said, interessted in Rossi's work.


    What do you think about the one timers, the single named (female and male) users/postings on JNoP?

    Are you serious? Gosh, we can discuss his SK puppet show video going viral, and his research paper being read by over 20,000 people! Everyone on JONP is talking about it, so it must be a big deal.

    [...]

    No, Shane you got me wrong! [TM] Jed R. :-)

    You missed the smiley's and the "SCNR!"

    There was some kind of sacrasm in my text, didn't make it clear enough, I see now.


    Sam is just "mirroring" JoNP messages into this thread. Why?

    He does not make comments about it.

    He could add/say do something like Adrian (BTW: where are Adrian and IH Fanboy?)

    Would add some more fun :-)

    Sam

    It's the "Rossi Blog Comment Discussion " thread, not the Rossi JoNP mirror thread 8)


    So, what's your comment?
    What's up to discuss? :/


    SCNR!

    • Andrea Rossi May 5, 2019 at 8:42 AM

      Marco, Chuck Davis, all Readers:

      I am delighted to read the comments of our Readers that discuss between themselves: this blog is not just where I answer to questions, I’d like to read more comments of Readers that ask each other help, information, opinions…mind, this blog is also a tool of yours.

      Warm Regards,

      A.R

    Hmm, seems that there is a change on JoNP.

    No more sockpuppet's posts?

    Less Rossi answers?


    From the statistic view, it's to early to make a final conclusion :-)

    But, I see a change ...

    • Rita May 2, 2019 at 4:57 AM

      Dr Rossi,

      What is your position about the possibility that the Casimir force is a possible explication of the Rossi effect?

    • Andrea Rossi
      May 2, 2019 at 7:31 AM Rita: The Casimir force is weak, but, as explained in my paper, in par. 1, it is not impossible that in certain conditions the Casimir force can balance the Coulombian force. It is not my first choice, but cannot be ignored. Warm Regards, A.R.

    Thousands of downloads of Dott. Rossi's paper, but only the sockpuppets on JONP talk about it :-)

    Has anybody found a discussion about the paper on the net? (Not ECW or the usual suspects).

    In the serious german science blogs, it is not mentioned. Nothing. Even not his 2019 demo. (What a surprise).


    Hey, something in my language.

    Yes, hot air, done by the famous E-Cat!

    I find it interessting, that at the end of the clip, there is a "... for LEONARDO Corporation / http://www.ecat.com"

    IMHO, in due time, Dott. Rossi will post something in CAPITAL LETTERS on JONP, again ....


    After some googling, I found some links to this Ulrich W. A. Kranz.

    Obscure networking with "free energy" aka LENR, CF, the usual stuff.


    One site is linking to LENR forum :-)

    The rest is outdated or "obscure".

    Again, it's the usual stuff.

    :rolleyes:


    Update:

    ->LF, 25.08.2018

    There he is already.

    Rossi's nasty mental problems don't explain why IH team left full money ?

    People like Dewey Weaver are very very very clever and know how to juggle with business.

    I conclude that inevitably Rossi has proven them significant XH a day.

    Rossi has not proven real XH.

    He used his tricky setups and maybe there was some help from reports, made by real scientists.

    But I don't want to reactivate that case.


    Another point of view, sometimes truth is less far than we think..

    Rossi simply has cancer, because of his work, so who knows what psychological state would be in his case ?

    He would seek to hide it because bad to his business.

    How do you know that he has cancer?

    From his own blog, where he is talking with himself?

    1. Andrea Rossi November 25, 2017 at 2:23 PM

      Rodney Nicholson:

      1- yes

      2- miracle (I had months ago cancer surgery to the head and have to wear a special wig designed to protect from radiations).

      Warm Regards,

      A.R.

    In criminal psychology there is something called the "dark triad" which is a trio of personality disorders -- narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy --that often cluster together. Of these, Rossi strongly displays both narcissism (grandiose, self-centred behaviour) and Machiavellianism (manipulation, callous disregard of others), and seems pretty high in one of the dimensions of psychopathy (boldness and impetuosity). These are personality disorders, and as such are core items of psychological structure that someone cannot simply turn on and off at will.


    A narcissist treats all those around him as but bit players on the glittering stage that is his (or her) life. The adulation is important and whether he is wealthy or poor doesn't matter. So I wouldn't expect Rossi to stop his charades just because he has made some money at them. It goes a lot deeper than that.


    I remember the case of Mr. Jan Hendrik Schön, a "real" scientist.

    On the way to the Nobel prize.

    Not really comparable to A. Rossi, because Rossi isn't a scientist, but some things match.

    [...]

    Entanglement occurs between photons, which are massless, etc.



    Quantenverschränkung auf den Kopf gestellt

    Quantum entanglement turned upside down

    https://www.uibk.ac.at/public-…/presse/archiv/2018/1002/

    University of Insbruck (22.5.2018)

    "Die Verschränkung einzelner Teilchen - seien es Photonen, Atome oder Moleküle - gehört heute im Labor zum Alltag."

    "The entanglement of individual particles - be they photons, atoms or molecules - is part of everyday life in the laboratory today."


    Ein Photon mit einer Billionen Atome verschränkt

    A photon with a trillion atoms crossed

    https://www.scinexx.de/news/te…ionen-atome-verschraenkt/

    University of Warschau (03.03.2017)

    "Forscher haben erstmals ein Photon mit einem makroskopischen Objekt verschränkt – einem Klumpen aus einer Billion Atome."

    "Researchers have for the first time entangled a photon with a macroscopic object - a lump of one billion atoms"

    What is it with Germans, and their heavy metal music? :)

    Shane, I'm in the mood, but this is getting too much off topic:


    Here we go:

    Germany has a lot of different music to offer.

    Rammstein for e.g. is a mayor act from Germany, famous and sold out concerts all over the world, including the USA.


    What's your question, again? :-)