Thomas and Eric,
Just to clarify: I never used the Word "refuted" wrt the Focardi paper. That's a strong Word, that would not be used by serious scientists. I used the Word "criticism", which is the Word one would use when per reviewed papers are published that discusses other scientists papers and results..
this is what I said:
"
I have not found any criticism (Peer reviewed or not) of this paper. The authors also made a paper in 1994, which was critizied by physcists at CERN. CERN was not able to trigger any excess heat, they saw only excess heat during loading of hydrogen. I've read their paper and it's clear they did not try any trigger mechanism to "turn on" the Ni-H LENR, so they concluded no excess heat other than during Hydrogen absorption in lattice.
"