For the time given< I am unable to discover the fusion Froide papers - nor in La Tribune, neither in Les Echos- internet editions, bien sur!
Je regrette!
Peter
Regarding LENR-Cities, it was a bit early to disclose information about our NUKEY project in the UK. We are developing a research project in the field of Nuclear Waste Remediation working with Chester / Thornton Science Park in the UK (Science park working on Energy) with some work to be done by two other well-known universities. Our ambition is to co-develop with partners a technology platform for Nuclear waste remediation solutions.
Developing a startup business which includes scientific research projects in the field of Energy requires an innovative business model and we are struggling to get funding to support our whole effort about research, fundng platform for disruptive technologies and education.
We have another project ready about energy production but we are lacking some funding for now. Wake up investors ... 
Hello David, welcome to join as you know we would like to co-build an umbrella for all LENR activities in order to get at the end all of them to use the best path to succeed and support a viral development of the technology and market...
Since the very early stage, we have worked on the development of a european project. No LENRG team yet in France, but done in the UK, Italy and Switzerland, a potential partner in Germany and more. We need now several millions funding to grow up...
Hello David, Where is the 'Steve Jobs'CEO in the french industry. May be Niel. I have been said he had some interest about LENR.
It requires tons of mathematics and physics to prove things work but they work without them (tons of ...) but one needs them to be proven (it is not an affirmation but what people expect).
To prove what? That they work? Or that to think that we know how? LENR is not a scientific problem. It is about the way to solve a scientific problem. As usual, most managers ask for a proof. They should think what will happen when the proof will be there. They will only know that they do not know but it will be too late.. in the meantime, other will have built the way to kick their ass. It is as usual...
Remind that LENR is about a way to produce neutrons (see Allan Widom work for instance and more recentely the work of the swedish team ). Remind what Fermi said if we were able to 'play' with neutrons. .
About the article: too few peut-êtres.
Here are a couple of short raw Google Translate samples:
Cold Fusion, hopes for nuclear "green"
After being criticized for a quarter century,
the low-temperature nuclear fusion gaining
credibility. Furthermore it promises abundant energy
cheap and decentralized, it emits no radiation
dangerous radioactive. Industry, universities, centers
research and startups are mobilizing.
- - - - -
NEAR REACTOR MARKETING
For now, most projects not exceed the laboratory stage prototype However, two of them seem close to market their products on the market.
Starting with the company Leonardo Corporation. Its LENR reactor, called E-Cat, which uses hydrogen and nanostructured powders nickel and lithium, was designed by the researcher-entrepreneur Andrea Rossi and researcher Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna (Italy)In October 2014, E-Cat was the first reactor to be LENR an independent technical validation achieved notably by researchers the University of Bologna, University Uppsala (Sweden) and the Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. During thirty-two days, this tiny device 33 cm long and 12 cm in diameter reached a temperature between 1260 °C and 1400 °C, generated 1.5 MW, 3.2 to 3.6 times more energy than it consumed.
Currently, Andrea Rossi developing a range of prototypes E-Cat, from household generator 10 kilowatts to Station 1 MW.
Hello David. my intent was to say that the explanation in some way is making the fact and vice versa It is not a matter of contreversy but may be why there's contreversy
I think that the problem is not to stop LENR but that must be a concern...
@H-G
I think the journalist has done a great job. It is not so easy to tell what is this and what is the status ? This forum is itself a proof about that. There's obviously some interpretation and misinterpretation but this is not the key point. An open mind approch is the most important beacause one needs first to have people asking questions.
About 'reactor'. In January last year we organized an event with scientists working on different topics but all related to LENR. LENR is transmutation, catalyst, energy, superconductivity and more.
It seems that LENR is about getting some quantic effect at higher scale of organization of the Matter. it is why we have chosen the term "Nanoscale" to make the brigde.
The "La Tribune" paper (still in French) is at the Russian official LENR website too: http://lenr.seplm.ru/novosti/statya-v-lya-tribyun-o-khyas
Source : Peter GLuck.
Just one point that amaze me, the lack of coverage of that recent move.
Aggressive, dubious or enthusiastic, there should be reaction...
OK I admit; I'm not at all surprised, 
situation is psychiatric.
If LENR was as skeptic says, La Tribune would be insulted in public.
If LENR was dubious, La Tribune should be criticized for over-optimism.
If Science and Media were rational, they should be from dubious to enthusiastic.
If finance was independent from media and ideology it should be frenetic. (In fact it is, discretely, locally, like Woodford, Elforsk, Darden, China, Norway, Navy).
My interpretation is that the subject is so irrationally attacked that information cannot be propagated, nor criticized.
Thomas Kuhn was speaking of "incommensurable" paradigm.
We have discovered "intransmissible" facts.
All hypothesis of rationality are eliminated.
For your information. There're reactions but not public... I
