That is the definition of religion, not science.
There is by definition more than one interpretation of anomalous data, and skilled experimentalists know it.
Of course, it is possible that me356 has cast-iron data, such as a switchable and clearly measurable neutron flux, that would validate LENR to a third party with no compromise of trade secrets. In that case the evidence is indisputable, and he would be in line for a Nobel Prize and/or large amounts of money were he willing to submit to such black box testing.
In your world calorimetry is only valid when the COP is 1, your belief is purely religious. There is no doubt that LENR+ is real. Lugano proofs it, after 2 years no expert has come forward to validate the calculation errors stated here by some people (with no professional or practical experience - VERY IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER).
The answer of IH, which didn't specify any critique was the final nail in the coffin of the sceptics here.
Just accept science! Stop believing in things that aren't true