QuoteThings were "off"? "Could plausibly have been"?!? "An impression"??? What would it take for you to say this is fraud. How much more outrageous could they be? Imagine you come home, open the front door, and you find your furniture has been cut in pieces with a chainsaw, every dish in the kitchen is smashed, there is an ax through the TV . . . and you say: "Things seem a little off here. I get the impression someone trashed the place. I want to hear from the person who did this before I decide whether there is damage."
There is no conceivable "side" for Rossi and Penon to present. If they had any answers, Rossi would have given those answers instead of filing a lawsuit. There is nothing they could do to make this fraud more blatant or more obvious. Heck, sending the "steam" into a pretend customer site alone tells you it is fraud. The fact that the room is not as hot as an oven tells you it cannot be real. It is incredible that you or anyone else believes this nonsense.
There are many possible "wabbits" that Rossi and Penon could present. Just a couple wild guesses (not well thought out on my part) that come to mind are...
1) Proof of a low pressure source on the JM Products Inc. side of the wall that could have transported steam through the pipe.
2) Sensor readings or data from the manufacturing equipment indicating a high quantity of steam was brought in and/or thermal energy utilized.
3) Photographs or video of the setup somehow providing evidence the pipe was indeed full during operation of the plant. Remember, Rossi claimed they had the whole place rigged with security cameras monitoring everything.
4) An explanation for the rust line. I don't know what this could be, exactly. But a wild guess could be that at times when the plant was not in operation, the water level in the pipe could have dropped.
Again, I'm not saying these are good or adequate explanations. I'm just saying that there are possible "wabbits" that Andrea Rossi could submit. We don't know if he will or not. If all the way through the trial he does provide adequate answers, explanations, or wabbits, then obviously I.H. will win and public opinion will obviously be turned 99.99% against Andrea Rossi.