Display MoreDewey is close to Darden et al, who has stated on oath that it did not happen (at least I think so - somone will correct me if not).
So what do you want Dewey to say: "i'm not sure who is telling the truth here, my friend Tom in a sworne deposition or known liar Rossi in an off-hand blog comment"?
I think you are on another planet.
It is, from anyone's POV, a reasonable inference that the blog comment is a lie. Unless the same info is supported in a sworn Rossi deposition. Although not all the depo evidence is released I'd expect Rossi's side to highlight that one if it existed?
If we have Rossi sworn statement against Darden the same it is less clear, except that Rossi is a known liar and Darden not. And in that case Dewey's comment is still a reasonable inference - especially because he will believe strongly in this case that Tom is not lying.
THH
Why don't the "fans" demand that Rossi produce a dated copy of the alleged offer. So far it is just an unsworn comment on the internet. But as Abraham Lincoln is claimed to said " The problem with quotes found on the net is that they cannot be authenticated"