Clearance Items

  • I was going to put this in a PM but..

    It just seems most are using the million dollar front end machine instead of the piece of string from the old way. Now we have a hand full of people doing front end alignment ripping people off and virtually no one that can think to use string from the back tire to the front tire , ask anyone in here how to do it without a million dollar machine. you get the idea... I don/t know how I can help past this point..without using string.= old TV to understand magnetic rotation from something that looks like a ratchet gear.

    maybe I just need sleep..

    errr..

  • The piece cited by Alan Smithis by Tom Whipple. Mr. Whipple has supported Rossi at length and vociferously for years and far as I know has never repudiated him. At least I've never seen such a repudiation and I have a standing search for "Rossi" in Google. Far as I know, he reported on all sorts of RossiWonders but never wrote about the Rossi vs IH debacle and all the RossiFailures.


    Also, he censors the replies to his articles. In most cases, all effective rebuttals are deleted. You can draw your own conclusions about his credibility.



    The post above is by Mary Yugo. Mr. Yugo has criticised a number of researchers at length and vociferously for years, usually without reading their work. He's (probably) an obsessive dotard as evidenced by his standing search for "Rossi" in Google, and the repetitiveness of his writings. Far as I know, he has never had a technical or legal education but comments endlessly about the Rossi vs IH debacle and LENR in general.


    Also, he never admits to his frequent mistakes and misunderstandings. In all cases, effective rebuttals are ignored. You can draw your own conclusions about his credibility.

  • From Forbes:

    Quote

    There are, no doubt, charlatans and frauds who would exploit the ignorance and gullibility of others for their own gain, such as convicted fraud Andrea Rossi, shown with his highly-suspect device: the e-Cat. Wanting to believe in an outcome or conclusion is no substitute for the robust conclusions brought about by the full suite of scientific evidence.


    From Rends:

    Quote

    'problematic' LENR projects

    Ask to IH if "problematic" project are the right words and definition for this hoax.

    The truth is only one: the E-Cat farce and ten years of Rossi's smoke mean a lot of clicks and propaganda for L-F.


    Quote

    L-F-User are mature and informed enough to build up their own minds.

    Oh "mature and informed enough", major proves here are AA and many others Rossi’s fans/supporters like him.

  • From https://www.forbes.com/sites/s…ove-science/#43e455f0734b

    e-cat-300x225.jpg

    There are, no doubt, charlatans and frauds who would exploit the ignorance and gullibility of others for their own gain, such as convicted fraud Andrea Rossi, shown with his highly-suspect device: the e-Cat. Wanting to believe in an outcome or conclusion is no substitute for the robust conclusions brought about by the full suite of scientific evidence.

    Why is it Rossi the charlatan?


    BTW:

    We Mods&Admins discussed whether to add 'problematic' LENR projects to the list and came to the conclusion that although those projects may be possibly scam, they are still prominent LENR storys and the L-F-User are mature and informed enough to build up their own minds.


    What about adding a tenth story? "F&P boil-off experiment (a review)"

  • After more of 10 years of lies, fakes and smoke, on L-F still quoted and defined as an "interesting story".

    Yes, interesting but only if the goal is to collect many clicks from fans, with the side effect of supporting him.

  • Hunter,


    If you keep protesting, we are going to include Rossi in the next poll.

    This is your/mods selection criteria for a L-F poll.

    I believed you were better, not another masked Rossi’s supporter, evidently I was wrong.

Supporting researchers for over 20 years
Want to Advertise or Sponsor LENR Forum?
CLICK HERE to contact us.