'm not surprised that you do not have time to deal with Cherokee's wrongdoing, since you devote it completely to fundamental things like discovering what people of the same name of Rossi do around the world daily. But it's a pity, because Cherokee never ceases to amaze you ... you could fill your days if you wanted to be interested in the story of Darden and his affiliated companies. Meanwhile, if you want to catch a breath between an attack on Rossi and the other, you can refer to these links:
I don't recall writing anything to suggest I am a fan of Cherokee or Darden. I do recall calling the man, in my opinion, both incompetent and negligent in his vetting of Rossi's claims. And I am aware of irregularities involving the fund. It isn't in my field of competence or interest.
They are devoting themselves to the replication of the E-Cat and probably try to make a test that is reproducible and reliable because they know that there are so many people like you who will even analyze it in punctuation in the hope of being able to find errors.
Yah shoore. How long would it take an academic to make a reasonable reply to critiques of the Lugano work for example?