The Imaginary Mass Lambda-CDM Model :: Science Publishing Group

Quote

The Imaginary Mass Lambda-CDM Model

Abstract: The Lambda-CDM (Cold Dark Matter) standard cosmological model is the generally accepted model of modern cosmology. However, many questions remain such as it doesn’t explain what Dark matter or Dark Energy is and what it is made of. Also to be the premier cosmological model it can't explain why we see no antimatter in the universe. This paper attempts to answer those questions and many more by incorporating FTL imaginary mass (Tachyons) into the Lambda-CDM (Cold Dark Matter). Rather than having a matter-antimatter big bang this new cosmological theory uses a big bang pair production of matter and FTL imaginary matter. In so doing it explains the effects of Dark Energy, Dark matter and a host of other cosmological phenomena that the current Lambda-CDM standard cosmological model can't answer. To support this Imaginary Mass Lambda-CDM model theory an electromagnetic experimental set-up is proposed so others can test and verify(indirectly) the existence of Tachyon matter.

The EVO is tachyonic matter but it does not have anything to do with faster than light propagation. The EVo is dark matter and most likely contributes to dark energy.

The EVO is a condensate of atoms, electrons and photons that was once visible matter but now acts as a single cold atom that does not interact in any way with the universe. Having once been visible matter, one of the indicators that the EVO is dark matter is that the EVO satisfies the Tully–Fisher relation (TFR). In the dark matter paradigm, a galaxy's rotation velocity is determined by the mass of the dark matter halo in which the visible matter is embedded, establishing a connection between visible and dark matter mass. The relationship between visible and dark matter begins when particle generation processes in stars create the metal nanoparticles that act like a seed that will eventually cool below their superconductor threshold when this nano-dust finds its way into cold space. The EVO is a special state derived from superconductivity in a condensed matter system that transforms visible matter into non interacting dark matter. Once the visible matter is transformed into dark matter, the dark matter becomes disconnected from the universe that it lives in by a domain wall enabled by a reversal of the vacuum state within the EVO. In effect, the change in the vacuum state of the EVO creates another universe. Superconductivity creates a tachyonic based anti vacuum with a vacuum field potential that is opposite in curvature to that of our universe. The superconductive transition enabled by a Higgs mode based condensed matter system also transforms the spacetime inside the EVO to anti de-Sitter space through tachyon condensation.

Quote from Alan Smith

So how come you can photograph them when they interact with their environment?

You cannot see EVO in dark mode.

Ken Shoulders: "Would These Objects Be Visible: Not while the EVO sheath was black."

From one of Ken Shoulders' research pictures as follows:

Fig. 12 is also normal in that the EVO run is

completely black. This is the type of run

needed when using the camera at high gain

to see how black the EVO really is. Under

these conditions, it is necessary to operate

with a dependable EVO source so that the

velocity can be surely known without seeing

it in the camera. With care in operation, the

gain of the channel plate electron multiplier

can be raised to about 50,000 times the

normal operating level without seeing

anything but scattered particles. With even

greater care, these stray events can be

suppressed for special measurements up to a

gain level of 1 million.

Quote from Alan Smith

So you were half right.

I am all right. In space the EVO will be dormant because there will be no electrons to feed it. In space, an EVO can be dormant indefinitely if no photons and/or electrons are available. Even when transmutation or matter dissociation is occuring, no energy is produced. Most here can not understand that the EVO does not produce energy when it encounters/processes matter.

Quote from Edo

So that is a statement you need to prove, or do not state it at all. Any nuclear transmutation, especially larger changes like spallation or fusion with oxygen for example, would have strong gamma ray's for starters, let alone being flooding with normal photons as a result. I think your statement is simply flat out wrong.

There is a natural tendency in the formulation of LENR theory to ignore or flat out deny the existence of outlying or contraindicated LENR processes that are generally observed and proven by observation but conflict the prevailing LENR meme and with preconceived notions of LENR reality.

One of these observations is that transmutation of elements in LENR does not for the most part yield energy: gamma, heat, light, particles, and loses mass.

These counter indicators include biological transmutation, the associated very safe and benign environment that LENR occurs in, and the unexplained loss of mass and/or energy where that loss is absolutely required by any proposed theory.

I have in mind the production of ferrosilicon in India where an electric arc processing method transmutes 4.5 tons of iron and silicon each day from carbon, oxygen and other ambient elements inside the environment of the electric arc blast furnace.

The outsized amount of transmutation of so much mass every day should produce enough energy to meet the power needs of Europe for a year form the output of hundreds of nuclear power stations, and yet that huge amount of energy production is not observed.

Transmutation in the LENR reaction for the most part occurs under a state of quantum mechanical superposition where that energy produced and the mass exposed to the LENR reaction is permanently lost to our reality.

Another possible shielding mechanism is that the transmutation occurs in a imaginary mass environment where the nature of quantum mechanical tunneling is reversed.

This false illusion about hydrogen fusion is pointless because the energy produced by this reaction is invisible to our observation. The issue is that the weirdness of quantum mechanics is made manifest to our observation and we cannot understand that it is happening.

We have been through this situation more than once. For some reason people just can't believe it. I understand that it is difficult to flush 30 years of LENR theory down the toilet, but it must be done to get to the truth.

http://coldfusioncommunity.net…18/08/244_JCMNS-Vol24.pdf

Abstract

In the period 1978–2002, The Silcal Metallurgic Ltd., a Coimbatore (India) based company, was engaged in the production of ferro silicon alloy deploying a 12 MVA “Submerged Carbon Arc” powered smelter. During a 11-week long non-stop round the clock operation of the plant in 1995, daily feed of raw materials was: Quartz (33.4 ton), charcoal (with fixed carbon content of 13.2 ton) and scrap steel (5.1 ton) while the daily output production of Fe–Si alloy (73.5% Si) was 24.75 ton. From the total weights of Si and Fe in the input feed and assuming 100% recovery of the metals, the daily output alloy production could at best have been only 20.5 ton. However to our surprise throughout the 11-week period the total daily Fe–Si alloy (with 73.5% Si) output was consistently 24.75 ton, corresponding to a daily “anomalous” excess metal production of 4.25 ton of Fe–Si alloy. The only source of Si entering the smelter furnace was the quartz raw material and that of Fe was the scrap steel (except for minor additional amounts of Fe originating from the steel casing of the consumable Söderberg carbon electrodes). Very careful vigil of the weights of daily input feed of raw materials and output alloy drained out as also the electrical energy consumption was maintained. It was evident that roughly 20% more metal than could be accounted for from the input feed was being produced and consequently we have been obliged to come to the conclusion that anomalous quantities of Si (2.8 ton/day) and Fe (1.45 ton/day) were being synthesized during the smelting process. Discussions with researchers involved in the Cold Fusion/LENR field have suggested that a likely explanation for the anomalous metal production could be the occurrence of transmutation reactions between nuclei of C and the O stripped from the SiO2 during the chemical reduction process. It is speculated that the intense varying magnetic fields generated by the kilo-amp levels of alternating current (AC) driving the arcing between the three gigantic carbon electrodes and the carbonic hearth of the furnace, in the 2000◦C temperature environment, could have somehow catalyzed transmutation reactions to occur, very similar to the transmutations reported in laboratory scale “Carbon-Arc experiments” first revealed by George Oshawa in 1964. But the more puzzling aspect of our observations is that there was no evidence of release of the expected massive amounts of nuclear energy that should have accompanied the postulated transmutation reactions based on the atomic masses of the nuclei involved.

7. Puzzle of the Missing Nuclear Energy

A worth noting feature of the Silcal observations was that there was no dramatic change whatsoever in the energy dissipation. Using the estimated energy release values of 17.13 MeV/atom of Si or 49.58 MeV per atom of Fe given in Appendix B, for the postulated nuclear transmutation reactions, it can be shown that corresponding to 4.25 ton of metal transmutation, the power generated should have been the equivalent of the total thermal power generated by hundreds of 1000MWe nuclear power stations. However, in our plant there was no evidence of such massive amounts of nuclear energy being released throughout the 11-week period, giving a handle to the skeptics to question our claims of ton level elemental transmutations. In this context it is worth noting that nobody in published LENR literature (to the best of our knowledge) has established a clear correlation between the quantum of transmutation products generated in carbon arc and the expected nuclear heat release based on atomic mass considerations. On the other hand neither has any publication claimed that the Carbon Arc experiment violates Einstein’s E = mc2 dictum. Thus if indeed the Silcal transmutation claims are confirmed it would clearly point to the operation of new Science wherein transmutation could be occurring without the accompaniment of the expected nuclear energy release. In the context of these remarks the arguments of Daniel Szumski elaborated in his “Least Action Nuclear Process” (LANP) Theory appear relevant. We learnt about Szumski’s work through his paper presented at ICCF 20 conference [13]. Szumski who has taken great pains to analyze in detail the transmutation observations of George Miley (see http://www.LeastActionNuclearProcess.com) argues that both endothermic and exothermic nuclear reactions can and do occur concurrently in LENR experiments, partly or wholly cancelling out net energy release. In fact he has referred to some experimental observations of Mizuno wherein transmutations have reportedly been observed by him not accompanied by energy release. Szumski is thus not at all surprised by our observation of “energy neutral” transmutation reactions

Another experiment that shows that the EVO does not produce energy when it encounters/processes matter in the LION experiment.

In this experiment, the EVO carves completely enclosed empty tunnels in diamond that are cleanly cut in hexagonal profile with smooth walls. These tunnels show no damage from any matter to energy conversion that would have resulted when the diamond removed from the tunnels were made to disappear. Small balls of transmuted matter are deposited at the end of the tunnels whose mass is a minuscule fraction of the removed material.

In LENR, energy is only released when the EVO terminates. At that time, an electron explosion of the cluster occurs.

What theory implications does lack of energy production in the LENR reaction have. It is now shown that environmental conditions do not affect the LENR reaction. Factors like high temperature and/or pressure do not effect the LENR reaction. For example, the LENR reaction is produced by a spark that can reach a temperature of 10,000C In a more extreme example, in the SAFIRE system, the LENR reaction occurs when temperatures are as high as 300,000K. There must exist a barrier between the environment and the LENR reaction.

It is to be expected that this barrier works in both directions such that processes inside the EVO do not affect the environment. The energy produced by the active LENR reaction is blocked by the environmental barrier.

When two states of a vacuum exist side by side, cosmological theory posits that a barrier called a domain wall exists to keep the two states of the vacuum apart. This connection applies when a false vacuum develops.

Domain wall - Wikipedia

Quote

A domain wall is a type of topological soliton that occurs whenever a discrete symmetry is spontaneously broken. Domain walls are also sometimes called kinks in analogy with closely related kink solution of the sine-Gordon model or models with polynomial potentials.^[1][2][3] Unstable domain walls can also appear if spontaneously broken discrete symmetry is approximate and there is a false vacuum.

A domain (hyper volume) is extended in three spatial dimensions and one time dimension. A domain wall is the boundary between two neighboring domains.

The video showing the CERN talk below explains the process that provides the transmutation mechanism active in LENR that is the proper process that must replace the invalid fusion meme.

The basic idea in this video is correct but the details are not correct as we have found through experimentation with EVOs.

The false ultra dense vacuum is carried by the EVO. This vacuum builds up in density and strength (vacuum potential) over time as more electrons are incorporated into the condensate. There comes a point where the false EVO vacuum grows large and reaches a maximum unsustainable level that results in the destruction of the EVO. Quantum tunneling is not involved in the false vacuum mechanism.

I understand that this concept is far more difficult to accept than the simple minded fusion meme but it eliminates all the incongruities presented by the fusion meme that makes science reject the fusion concept.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Keith-Fredericks/publication/340477470_A_New_Spacetime_Symmetry/links/5e8c291aa6fdcca789fbf6b8/A-New-Spacetime-Symmetry.pdf

A new spacetime symmetry

Keith A. Fredericks

Quote

Based on detection of elliptic particle tracks, about equal to 137^2n2 bigger than Bohr-Sommerfeld electron orbits, indicating the possible detection of superluminal electrons masquerading as magneticmonopoles, a new structure emerges leading to: (i) a new set of seven elementary lengths; (ii) replacement of the usual motion (Lorentz) transformations by scale transformations between v2 < c2 and v2 > c2 frames; (iii) equivalence of charge between v2 < c2 and v2 > c2 frames based on the Dirac-Schwinger quantization condition; (iv) a relativistic foundation for the Dirac-Schwinger quantization condition; (v) a possible cause of charge quantization; and (vi) the prospect of symmetry in Maxwell’s equations. If the elliptic particle tracks are viewed as a magnification of electron orbits, the effect is suggestive of a spacetime distortion such as those predicted in general relativistic theories.

A theory that identifies the particle that produces strange radiation. Any comment?

Quote from PhysicsForDummies

Here is some interesting research on Axil's reference for Axil's for his non-superluminal tachyonic theory. Warped Dynamics is quite the physics powerhouse, and Cole is their finest physicist.

Warped Dynamics did not ring a bell as a scientific University or Research institute. So I looked up this institution and their department of physics.

Axils reference:

"American Journal of Modern Physics

Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages: 1-14

The Imaginary Mass Lambda-CDM Model

Jason Cole

Department of Physics, Warped Dynamics LLC, Harper Woods, USA"

Company description:

"Warped Dynamics is your next gen audio company. We're introducing a new & exciting headphone line that will change the way you listen to personal audio"

http://www.warpeddynamics.com/

However before that they were a "small disadvantaged" business trying to get government contracts for aircraft "stuff".

WARPED DYNAMICS LLC

(313) 544-8139,

19204 Rockcastleunit108 Harper Woods, MI 48225

 Company Website | Map & Directions

Company Profile

Company Name:

WARPED DYNAMICS LLC

Govcb Vendor ID:

SAM00000000001363400

Year Established:

2010

Business Type:

Minority owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantage Business

Products & Services

NAICS Code(s)

• [336411] Aircraft Manufacturing

PSC Code(s)

• [AC12] R&D-aircraft-A research/exploration development
• [AC14] R&D-aircraft-engineering development
• [AC15] R&D-aircraft-opsy development

Contact Information

Contact Person:

JASON E COLE

https://www.govcb.com/governme…s-llc-Harper-Woods-MI.htm

Display More

Einstein once clerked at a patent office.

After finishing his studies in 1900, Einstein could not get accepted anywhere for a teaching post. Eventually he was offered a job by his friend’s father at a Swiss patent office in 1902, where Einstein’s task was to look through inventions, check their originality, and write clear patents to protect the inventors’ new ideas. His job lasted from 1902 to 1909, during which time Einstein published his four Annus Mirabilis (miracle year) 1905 papers. Einstein described the patent office as his ‘worldly cloister’, where he ‘hatched [his] most beautiful ideas’.

As Einstein once discovered, it's hard the make a living in science these days. You work where you can and develop your ideas as a hobby.

Fields with imaginary mass – Blue Systems

Quote

In the paper that coined the term “tachyon”, Gerald Feinberg studied Lorentz invariant quantum fields with imaginary mass. Because the group velocity for such a field is superluminal, naively it appears that its excitations propagate faster than light. However, it was quickly understood that the superluminal group velocity does not correspond to the speed of propagation of any localized excitation (like a particle). Instead, the negative mass represents an instability to tachyon condensation, and all excitations of the field propagate subluminally and are consistent with causality. Despite having no faster-than-light propagation, such fields are referred to simply as “tachyons” in many sources. Tachyonic fields play an important role in modern physics. Perhaps the most famous is the Higgs boson of the Standard Model of particle physics, which has an imaginary mass in its uncondensed phase. In general, the phenomenon of spontaneous symmetry breaking, which is closely related to tachyon condensation, plays an important role in many aspects of theoretical physics, including the Ginzburg–Landau and BCS theories of superconductivity. Another example of a tachyonic field is the tachyon of bosonic string theory. Tachyons are predicted by bosonic string theory and also the Neveu-Schwarz (NS) and NS-NS sectors, which are respectively the open bosonic sector and closed bosonic sector, of RNS Superstring theory prior to the GSO projection. However such tachyons are not possible due to the Sen conjecture, also known as tachyon condensation. This resulted in the necessity for the GSO projection.

All fundamental particles have positive mass. The Higgs field is the only known field that is imaginary. The EVO is not a particle, it is a bubble of a false Higgs field. Two such field can be separated by a domain wall. The EVO as an imaginary field is inherently unstable that will inevitably decompose. This is uncommon cutting edge stuff, and I will attempt to understand it. If anyone here has insights into the nature and current research concerning the Higgs field, I would be grateful for any insights that you are willing to share.