Quote from Edo

Science is on the quest of understanding nuclear reactions and how to trigger them and make them useful.

I have had some formal training in nuclear engineering. Over the years, I have come to realize that the nuclear energy approach is unsound. Currently, energy from nuclear reactions are generally rejected because of the dishonesty and arrogance that people have come to expect from the nuclear community. The LENR reaction does support a nuclear reaction, but that road to energy generation IMHO is a dead end. But the LENR reaction when increased in power density there is a reaction switch takes over. Then the system becomes more of a gainful over unity EMF based reaction where electrons energy can be harvested directly to produce electrical current. A system that harvest electron gainful energy is the one being developed by Egely. From Rossi's theory paper, it looks like he is also using electron clustering in his systems. The LEC might be another electron reaction based system.

It is true that lattice confinement can produce hallmarks of a nuclear fusion reaction: neutrons, and gamma radiation with the appropriate energy levels, but those hallmarks go away when the power density is increased. Then the electron based reaction takes over. So from a practical standpoint the electron based reaction is the only road to gainful and abundant energy production.

Quote from RobertBryant

The claims about 4,25 ton mass discrepancy over a 11 week period were never confirmed by independent, rigorous metering of mass product streams

and the claims will never be confirmed.. Silcal factory is a dead duck since 2002

Well then, take a look at the Thor system. Massive amounts of carbon goes into the double sphere and only oxygen comes out the tail pipe. Its all been measured by industry standard metering.

CNO cycle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…0BOREXINO%20collaboration.

A cycle of CNO fusion reactions occur that result in a total energy output of 26.73 MeV.

There are a few other CNO cycles that end up yielding oxygen but they all produce a huge amount of energy.

It goes to reason that the Thor system should be generating gigawatts of energy from the CNO fusion process. but it doesn't.

In a demo, I saw a guy breathing in the exhaust from an operating Thor system and he showed no ill effects.

I have stumbled upon a close correspondence between EVOs and a field of science that predicts the EVO mechanisms. This involves the Q-ball and the Fermi-ball.

Q-balls are non-topological solitons that are a type of shadow matter.

They are formed when there is an attraction between bosonic particles. Q-balls are finite-sized "blobs" that contain a large number of particles.

They are known to rotate coherently in field space.

Q-balls are a form of shadow matter that only participate in gravitational interactions. They could have formed during the Big Bang and have the ability to break down ordinary matter.

Q-balls are soliton-like solutions that exist in certain types of scalar field theories. They appear naturally in Supersymmetric extensions of Standard Model (SSM).

Q-balls were first posited by Harvard physicist Sidney Coleman about 20 years ago. In 1985, Princeton University physicists Ian Affleck and Michael Dine proposed a theory that uses Q-balls to explain the matter-antimatter asymmetry of the universe.


Some Q-Ball background

First posited some 20 years ago by Harvard physicist Sidney Coleman, a Q-Ball is a super-heavy object that could have formed during the Big Bang and would have the ability to break down ordinary matter made of protons and neutrons. Normally, protons are stable because they are the lightest particles to carry a conserved quantum number called the baryon number, and there is no way for them to get rid of this number and decay. But Q-balls, made from tightly packed supersymmetric particles that can accommodate a baryon number at lesser energetic cost than a proton, allow the proton to disintegrate, while the baryon number of the Q-ball increases. Q-Balls, says Dr. Cox, "can be pictured as giant agglomerations of supersymmetric particles that could, if they drifted into the heart of a star, eat away like a cancer, eventually destroying the star from within."

This all sounds like an EVO to me.

For Q-Ball formalism including the math see as follows:

https://guava.physics.uiuc.edu…s_Fall2006/files/raut.pdf

Here is how Q-Balls solve how cosmic inflation occurred and solves the mystery of antimatter asymmetry.

https://www.livescience.com/q-…%20place%20%E2%80%94%20in

The Fermi-Ball

A Fermi ball is a hypothetical object in cosmology that may have
been created in the early universe. It is a nontopological soliton with fermions trapped in its domain wall.

Fermi balls are thought to have arisen from spontaneous symmetry breaking. The intermediate physics of Fermi-ball formation includes trapping and supercooling.

In cosmology, Fermi balls are hypothetical objects that may have been created in the early history of the universe by spontaneous symmetry breaking. One paper has described them as "charged SLAC-bag type structures".[ Fermi balls can be modeled as a type of non-topological soliton.

The concept is named after Enrico Fermi (see Fermion).

Hypothesized explanations for observed phenomena

Dark matter

A paper by theoretical physicists at Seoul National University has proposed that Fermi balls may be implicated in the formation of primordial black holes from a cosmic first-order phase transition, as a candidate explanation for dark matter.


The Q-Ball and the Fermi-Ball can provide the LENR community with an entry into organized science without the recrimination that comes with LENR. The EVO (aka Q-Ball, Fermi-Ball) can explain the weirdness of the LENR reaction within a framework the sciences is anticipating.

We have seen experimental evidence (the hollow crenellate balls of transmuted matter) that points to the formation of ADS micro black holes inside the EVO. This corresponds to the Fermi-Ball Dark Matter formation hypothesis.

Is it a LENR based particle accelerator?

When a laser is used to generate the LENR reaction using nanoparticles, huge EMF fields are created. The laser interacts with electrons in an optical cavity produced by the nanoparticles on their surface to produce EVOs that explode with great force. Science is now using laser excited nanoparticles to produce huge EMF fields and ultra high energy electrons in a new micro particle collider. But the builders of the micro collider do not understand how the collider works.

The production of tritium is used as proof that nuclear fusion is occurring in the LENR reaction. But tritium can also be generated using laser irradiation of nanoparticles. The nanoparticles provide an optical cavity in which polaritons form. It is the condensate of polaritons that are nuclear active.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1306.0830

Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water

In the last 20 years, especially after the first works on the possibility of realization of thermonuclear reactions via the electrolysis of heavy water with a Pd cathode, during which excess heat is evolved and neutrons and tritium nuclei are detected [12, 13], the number of problems that arise has increased. If the results from works on “cold fusion” raised (and still raise) certain doubts due to their irreproducibility in different laboratories, experimental evidence on the possibility of the transmutation of various nuclei upon the laser excitation of nanoparticles [6-9, 11] and electro-explosions of metallic electrodes in aqueous solutions of salts of unstable isotopes [10] are well reproducible. These results confirm the possibility of initiation of nuclear transformations in cold plasma.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Device-architecture-and-optical-characterization-a-Cavity-polariton-schematic-The-green_fig2_332179201

Device architecture and optical characterization. a Cavity polariton schematic. The green sheet represents monolayer WSe2. The cavity is assembled by two SiO2/Ta2O5 distributed Bragg reflector (DBR) mirrors with a λ/2 cavity spacing. Strong coupling of excitons and photons leads to the formation of polaritons. b Cavity reflectance and WSe2 PL spectrum. For vertical incidence, cavity resonance is measured as 1.644 eV (red). PL centers at 1.664 and 1.636 eV under ambient conditions before (black dashed) and after (black solid) deposition of the top dielectric layer. c Energy-momentum dispersion of cavity polariton. These curves are fitted by a coupled-harmonic-oscillator model with an 11.4 meV Rabi splitting. Dashed lines represent bare resonances and the solid lines stand for two polariton branches. Errorbars are extracted from least square fitting

Quote from RobertBryant

Axil..random sticks do not make a scaffolding

You seem not to understand what an optical cavity was so I posted and example. Next time I will let you wallow in ignorance.