The Exotic Vacuum Object (EVO) as the cause of the vacuum reaction.

Quote from Edo

Just food for thought....

A metal reacts readily with an acid (which is chemically speaking H3O+) or an excess of protons or Hydrogen if you will. The funny thing is, it does not reacts with plastic beakers or glass (mostly). Case in point, the radicals created in HHO gas are just like the Acidic or Alkaline components in water (there is always a little bit even in pure water). so it is in my mind not surprising at all there is a huge difference in reaction to exposure of HHO gas between plastic like stuff and a metal...
So this can easily be explained with a chemical mindset, nothing fancy about it. It is a very interesting thing though and worth researching IMHO.

It is my belief that the LENR reaction is predicated on a mechanism that is underpinned by transition metals. In his patent, Piantelli states that the reaction is supported by all transition metals. The production mechanisms of Surface plasmon polaritons (SPP) requires a metal dielectric surface interface.

This LENR reaction production mechanism might have been the reason why the titanium sheet and copper coin exploded after a time when the metal came in contact with the Teflon. Usually, hydrogen provides the dielectric properties required to produce the SPPs in sufficient amounts to support the development of the LENR reaction. But air is not sufficiently dielectric to produce the required conditions for SPP development and amplification on the surface of a metal. But the Teflon has the correct dielectric properties upon direct contact with a metal to greatly support and amplify the SPPs as the active agent in the LENR reaction.

FYI

Surface plasmon polaritons (SPPs) are electromagnetic waves that travel along the interface between a metal and a dielectric or air. The term "surface plasmon polariton" refers to the fact that the wave involves both charge motion in the metal and electromagnetic waves in the air or dielectric.

SPPs are collective electron oscillations that occur when an external electromagnetic wave interacts with the free electrons in a metal at the metal–dielectric interface. They are collective longitudinal oscillations of electrons near a material surface, strongly coupled to an electromagnetic wave.

SPPs propagate in a wave-like fashion along the planar interface between a metal and a dielectric medium. Their amplitude decays exponentially with increasing distance into each medium from the interface.

SPPs propagate tangentially to the surface and decay exponentially in the perpendicular direction. Their wavelength is often smaller when compared to the free space wavelength at the same frequency.

Spoof SPPs inherit the properties of natural SPPs, including dispersion characteristics, field confinement, and subwavelength resolution.

Quote from Wyttenbach

You should go to a church where one highly estimates hearty believe..

Physics is about facts=experiments that finally match a mathematical/logic model... thus not much believe just dry facts...

The Greenyer/Egely experiment is a solid demonstration of experimental fact presentation on the fly as it happened. Anyone who is devoted to the science/logic model is constrained and convinced by such evidence presented thereto. How this group of supposed supporters of the logic model of science can resist those facts presented in these resent posts must have some ulterior motives exclusive of any logic.

In point of fact, Ken Shoulders said that the big guns in the LENR community is too heavily invested in a decades long list of pronouncements that have been documented in numerous publications that they cannot deviate from. It is this community that has a religious belief system of disproven and misguided doctrinaire that resists any progress in understating the LENR reaction.

Lessen to what Ken Shoulders thought about the cold fusion community, its leaders, and the EVO.

Gravitational Turbulent Instability of Anti-de Sitter Space
https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.182…pport%20for%20this%20idea.

Ken Shoulders States that he was convinced that the EVO produced black holes because of the behavior of the EVOs that he observed. Shoulders saw matter go into the EVO but nothing ever came out. Neither did any form of energy exit the EVO. The question becomes where does the mass and energy absorbed by the EVO go to? The issue covered in this post involves the possible mechanism that will produce this energy/matter disappearance behavior within the EVO by precipitating the formation of a micro black hole.

The referenced paper states as follows:

Quote

Bizon and Rostworowski have recently suggested that anti-de Sitter spacetime might be nonlinearly unstable to transfering energy to smaller and smaller scales and eventually forming a small black hole. We consider pure gravity with a negative cosmological constant and find strong support for this idea. While one can start with a single linearized mode and add higher order corrections to construct a nonlinear geon, this is not possible starting with a linear combination of two or more modes. One is forced to add higher frequency modes with growing amplitude. The implications of this turbulent instability for the dual field theory are discussed.

The characteristic that the EVO must possess is that it is a spacetime that has a negative cosmological constant.

The EVO is formed from a Bose Einstein Condensate (BEC) of polaritons that has negative energy. This condensate will produce "anti-de Sitter spacetime" which is a spacetime that has a negative cosmological constant.

The referenced paper shows how any energy waves (aka geon) input into a confined anti-de Sitter spacetime circular containment will be inherently gravitationally unstable. Over time this instability will concentrate this energy into a micro black hole.

Quote from RobertBryant

Many of the attributes of EVO’s or charged clusters can be explained by this model.

One characteristic of an EVO that this conventional trope does not cover is the disappearance of matter and energy while the EVO is active. Ken Should should have known about this issue and he has commented on it..

What Ken Shoulders said about black holes inside EVOs

They contain
46:50

all the characteristic that black hole does they swallowed material to make it go away
46:56

that's what they do astrophysics has a talks about black
47:01

holes big black holes I said same thing all the way down it
47:08

goes in and where does it go out the nigga's in the hole in the gazelle
47:14

it goes into another Universe there's another writing on that subject now that's where you get spooky
47:20

I don't believe in other universities I don't believe that I see them go away so
47:25

they let where I am if they went somewhere else I gotta assign that a
47:31

place you just don't have the vision I can bring them back see it as long as they don't go too far

Publications by K. Shoulders

1 - Ken Shoulders_EV, a tale of discovery (3).pdf

2 - Charge Clusters In Action (Ken Shoulders) (1).pdf

3 - permittivity transitions (1).pdf

4 - what's an evo (1).pdf

5 - EVO Life Cycle (1).pdf

6 - Basic EVO Questions (2).pdf

Quote from RobertBryant

unfortunately the sketchy 1996 evidence for EV or NEV or EVO in electrolytic LENR from Dash's samples may well have been due to impurities from rolling..

We have new evidence of element reformation and transmutation from EVOs from multiple systems in the form of hollow thin walled crenellated balls that ranger in diameter from nanometers to microns that are proportional in size to the EVOs that produced these balls.