Perhaps that is all I need; LENR results that become more convincing when replicated.
For example, Daniel_G's results here would be that, if replication showed something similar.
I find Daniel_G's lastest project intriguing. Not because the evidence is good yet (the ICCF presentation was poor in this respect) but because he proposes to send working reactors to researchers for verification and because he says that he is willing to pay attention to people's suggestions.
It makes me wonder if there is room here for participants on LENR Forum to help craft standards for what would be considered convincing results -- either for or against -- in trials of Mizuno's reactors. My dream would be to come up with a set criteria, ahead of time, for Daniel_G to use that would convince me. I would be putting something at stake.
I'm not sure that this is even possible if researchers are working with sealed black-box reactors (for instance, would you know whether or not your controls are adequate?), but I think it may be valuable to talk about. At least it would be forward looking instead of rehashing 30-year-old results.