It is only the LENR community, and a few whacky pseudo-science companies, who mistake patents (granted or no) for science.
I think that is very disrespectful. I am not aware of anybody doing fundamental research in the LENR field (as distinct from people trying to sell vapourware or raise cash for investment funds who might be involved in what is called 'astroturfing') who mistake patents for practical realities.
The main reason that their name might appear on one is to appease investors. Discussing this with a very well-known researcher his comment was 'If your investors demand patents be filed, you probably need smarter investors'.