A totally factual and well supported message has nothing to do with anyone's love or hate for the messenger.
Sure - but as I have detailed, and no-one here has argued against, Krivit's report here is neither totally factual nor well supported. Zephir additions are plain weird and contrafactual. And the Nature article satisfies "totally factual and well supported". So I guess you are 100% agreeing with me?
THH