This flight of fantasy devoid of any logic
In your case I suggest that you first try to understand the difference between a physical field and a mathematical field.
But this needs some basic education most teached physicists miss.
Once you learn the difference you will understand that the standard model it outstanding garbage.
Display MoreJohn Huizenga wrote a scathing book denouncing cold fusion research in 1993. He mocked cold fusion by alluding to its unexplained characteristics as "miracles." Huizenga's three miracles were:
Miracle #1: the mystery of how the Coulomb barrier is penetrated
Miracle #2: the lack of strong neutron emissions
Miracle #3: the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays
Y'all still can't explain the 3 miracles of cold fusion. Where are the predicted fusion generated gammas and the neutrons? You talk of fusion and fission but the nuclear indicators are nowhere to be found.
Miracle #1 is about the Maxwell distribution of speeds of molecules in a gas. The activation energy (energy to overcome the coulomb barrier) for a nuclear reaction is assumed as the basis for miracle one to come from the high energy tail of Maxwell's distribution. Therefore, how could something a room temperature have a high energy tail in the MeV range? However, electro-gravity produces a distribution with energies in the MeV range. Hence, one finds in "an amazing result from Ed Storms" a distribution of energy of particles from an LENR reaction. The peaks in the distribution are E = n2 (.0457 MeV). Wrong assumption, hence, no miracle.
Miracle #2 and Miracle #3 are about "fermentation of the nucleus"; Matsumoto's Nattoh model. Doing nuclear reaction in a warp field is very different than doing nuclear reaction with universal gravity. Electro-gravity also affects the distribution of masses and energies of the atomic nucleus. The principal effect is that neutrons are converted to "pseudo" neutrons. Hence, "pseudo- neutrons are emitted but very few neutrons. The warp field's effect on the nucleus also changes the expectation of emission of gamma or x-rays. So, wrong basis, hence no miracles.
Recently all this was reviewed in the thread ultra-dense-hydrogen-and-rydberg-matter-a-more-informal-general-discussion-in post #815. If you need more information, please let me know.
John Huizenga wrote a scathing book denouncing cold fusion research in 1993. He mocked cold fusion by alluding to its unexplained characteristics as "miracles." Huizenga's three miracles were:
Miracle #1: the mystery of how the Coulomb barrier is penetratedMiracle #2: the lack of strong neutron emissions
Miracle #3: the lack of strong emission of gamma or x-rays
Huizenga's knowledge of theory is far above my head. If he said these characteristics are unexplained and they violate conventional physics, I am sure he was right. Even if someone explains them I will have no idea what they mean.
HOWEVER, Huizenga was not doing science. He violates the scientific method. Cold fusion is definitely nuclear fusion. That is an observation. It produces heat in the same ratio to helium as D-D plasma fusion. It consumes no chemical fuel. It produces tritium. The results have been widely replicated, often at astronomically high signal to noise ratios. That is proof. There is no other kind of proof in science. Any theory that says this cannot happen is wrong, by definition.
Huizenga should have known that. His book is a travesty. It has no value and should be dismissed by anyone with an elementary school knowledge of the scientific method.
Y'all still can't explain the 3 miracles of cold fusion. Where are the predicted fusion generated gammas and the neutrons? You talk of fusion and fission but the nuclear indicators are nowhere to be found.
Yes, we cannot explain them. And that fact has no relevance to whether cold fusion is real. We cannot explain countless phenomena, such as why half-lives of unstable elements vary, but no one doubts the measurements of half-lives. You NEVER, EVER need a theory before accepting an observation.
Your second sentence is flat out wrong: the nuclear indicators are right in your face, and have been all along. What do you think helium and tritium are?
There are other opinions in the field that do not accept the notion that the energy produced by the reaction comes from nuclear biding energy. For example, the SAFIRE system produces transmutation of a verity of gases to very heavy elements like rare earths. Fusion cannot produce rare earth elements here on earth. These heavy elements are produced in supernovas. There is no signs that nuclear reactions are going on within the SAFIRE system. These types of heavy element transmutations are caused by something else.
LeClair created every element in the periodic table including transuranic super heavy elements using cavitation. There is no type of fusion that Science knows of that can produce these types of elements.
Yes, helium and tritium are produced in some experiments but this type of transmutation does not necessarily indicate their source is a fusion reaction. The cause is more likely due to a coherent optical process.
Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid targets in heavy water
E.V. Barmina1, S.F. Timashev2,3 and G.A. Shafeev1,3
Huizenga did not mention as a LENR miracle all these transmuted elements are all stable isotopes. Nuclear processes do not always produce stable transmuted elements. And transmutation usually occurs without the production of any energy.
Yes, lattice assisted fusion does occur and does produce the appropriate nuclear reaction indicators. But this does not mean that there are not other types of reactions that are not nuclear based and do not produce nuclear reaction indicators.
In your case I suggest that you first try to understand the difference between a physical field and a mathematical field.
But this needs some basic education most teached physicists miss.
Once you learn the difference you will understand that the standard model it outstanding garbage.
smothering else.
pls check the physical spell field..
The cause is more likely due to a coherent optical process.
so helium is produced from deuterium by a " coherent optical process....not fusion
..maybe a topic for ICCF26?
pls check the physical spell field.
A typical example of crackpot SM physics is the Dirac equation proposed by a mathematician with no clue of basic physics. A one sided mathematical field is set equal to a physical field (what needs strict limits) and mass is unified with field energy what is intellectual garbage.
The hype became famous by the same method as the fake verification of Einsteins GR. Propaganda: The equation second solution is the positron.... Triumph!!
This is a fools argument because e- + e+ together show no wave symmetry and thus are not solutions of this childish equation... This is real physics = experiment.
Yes, helium and tritium are produced in some experiments but this type of transmutation does not necessarily indicate their source is a fusion reaction. The cause is more likely due to a coherent optical process.
A rose by another name is still a rose. So, all it what you want but it is still fusion just not thermonuclear fusion.
A rose by another name is still a rose. So, all it what you want but it is still fusion just not thermonuclear fusion.
A nuclear decay process is not fusion. Deuterium becomes tritium when a neutron is added to the nucleus. Then that neutron becomes a proton when tritium decays into helium 3.
In the laser activated experiment sited above, no H hydrogen is involved, just D2O and various metals.
A similar Bibarian and Mastromattmo replication of a laser activated transmutation process was presented during the last ICCF24 by the Army where three types of lasers (red, green and blue) were used to induce transmutation on the surface of an ingot of palladium. There was 3 bar atmosphere of hydrogen involved. The experiment is simple, palladium is transmuted into other elements by laser light: Nickel, sodium, iron, molybdenum, calcium, silicon, aluminum, and zinc associated with the laser light type. The type of fusion needed to produce these elements are to be found in a supernova. There must be some other mechanism other than fusion involved in the transmutation of these elements. Cr39 particle detection show no particle activity associated with the transmutation.
Y'all ignore experiments that do not fit into your groupthink, and there are many examples of such experiments.
I have an opinion as to the causation of transmutation. There is a hypothesized process called vacuum decay that is capable of producing mass disruption and reorganization of nuclear structures.
More simply than your postulate... electron capture ?
Display MoreA nuclear decay process is not fusion. Deuterium becomes tritium when a neutron is added to the nucleus. Then that neutron becomes a proton when tritium decays into helium 3.
In the laser activated experiment sited above, no H hydrogen is involved, just D2O and various metals.
A similar Bibarian and Mastromattmo replication of a laser activated transmutation process was presented during the last ICCF24 by the Army where three types of lasers (red, green and blue) were used to induce transmutation on the surface of an ingot of palladium. There was 3 bar atmosphere of hydrogen involved. The experiment is simple, palladium is transmuted into other elements by laser light: Nickel, sodium, iron, molybdenum, calcium, silicon, aluminum, and zinc associated with the laser light type. The type of fusion needed to produce these elements are to be found in a supernova. There must be some other mechanism other than fusion involved in the transmutation of these elements. Cr39 particle detection show no particle activity associated with the transmutation.
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
Y'all ignore experiments that do not fit into your groupthink, and there are many examples of such experiments.
I have an opinion as to the causation of transmutation. There is a hypothesized process called vacuum decay that is capable of producing mass disruption and reorganization of nuclear structures.
There is a hypothesized process called vacuum decay that is capable of producing mass disruption and reorganization of nuclear structures.
We should ask him to better know the oscillation frequency he expects...
In the papers that I supply below, Egely makes a case for the roll of the polariton in the LENR reaction. These papers have been lost on the internet so I am happy to restore them for your consideration. Egely was a proponent of the role of quasiparticles in the LENR reaction. These papers begin to explain their role in the reaction. Over the years I have attempted to understand in detail how the process of transmutation works as actioned by the polariton and its condensate.
The polariton was believed to be LENR causative by NASA pursuant to the Windom-Larson theory
A polariton is an electron that is reformed form a fermion into a boson by an entanglement process with a boson. This dressed electron is now able to form clusters and aggregate in great numbers into a Bose condensate. When so reformed, the polariton condensate is now able to both access vacuum energy via it superconductive nature and also reform nuclear matter based on its ability to modify the mass of quarks when the polariton achieves superconductivity.
The EVO is a polariton condensate and so is ball lightning.
The branches of science involved in this subject are condensed matter science, quantum and nano optics, nano plasmonics and particle physics.
Display MoreIn the papers that I supply below, Egely makes a case for the roll of the polariton in the LENR reaction. These papers have been lost on the internet so I am happy to restore them for your consideration. Egely was a proponent of the role of quasiparticles in the LENR reaction. These papers begin to explain their role in the reaction. Over the years I have attempted to understand in detail how the process of transmutation works as actioned by the polariton and its condensate.
The polariton was believed to be LENR causative by NASA pursuant to the Windom-Larson theory
A polariton is an electron that is reformed form a fermion into a boson by an entanglement process with a boson. This dressed electron is now able to form clusters and aggregate in great numbers into a Bose condensate. When so reformed, the polariton condensate is now able to both access vacuum energy via it superconductive nature and also reform nuclear matter based on its ability to modify the mass of quarks when the polariton achieves superconductivity.
The EVO is a polariton condensate and so is ball lightning.
The branches of science involved in this subject are condensed matter science, quantum and nano optics, nano plasmonics and particle physics.
The branches of science involved in this subject are condensed matter science, quantum and nano optics, nano plasmonics and particle physics.
And chemistry and engineering and mathematics. It's the whole wagon train.
The EVO is a polariton condensate and so is ball lightning.
The EVO is a product of the phat equation. The phat equation describes the quantum states of photon condensates as related to the atom being ionized. There is a pseudo particle which creates a string complex with an electron that is the basis of the EVO condensate and for phat states. Fusion followed by fission creates the transmutation distribution about which this thread is focused. All of that has been said and further documented with data. You are just saying the same thing with different words and proposing wild ideas as alternative theories without data support.
A rose is still a rose.
The EVO is a product of the phat equation. The phat equation describes the quantum states of photon condensates as related to the atom being ionized. There is a pseudo particle which creates a string complex with an electron that is the basis of the EVO condensate and for phat states. Fusion followed by fission creates the transmutation distribution about which this thread is focused. All of that has been said and further documented with data. You are just saying the same thing with different words and proposing wild ideas as alternative theories without data support.
A rose is still a rose.
Bose–Einstein condensation of polaritons - Wikipedia
There are over 70 types of polaritons where electrons and other particles become entangled with a boson.
An example of a non electron is the phonon as an entangled boson partner of the photon. Phonon polaritons: is a collective excitation comprised (infrared) light coupled with a polar lattice vibration.
These many types of polariton condensates that are all described by the Gross-Pitaevskii theory. The question is how many of these polariton types are LENR active?
The behavior of the electron based condensate will also include the formation of vortices as seen in the SAFIRE project as pictured on page 12 of that theory article. The SAFIRE system is a exact example of the Gross-Pitaevskii theory and the EVO based representation of that theory. The SAFIRE plasma is a macro sized EVO.
The Gross-Pitaevskii theory
The key connection between the LENR reaction and the polariton condensate is the laser like superconductive nature of the condensate. The polariton condensate as a superconductor enables access to the Higgs potential and its expression of the Higgs mode which is a gateway to the creation of a wide range of vacuum states other than those of the cosmological Higgs field. The EVO is in fact a exotic vacuum object. My guess is that when Ken Shoulders renamed the EV to EVO, he recognized that the EVO has a unique vacuum state but did not understand how a collection of electrons could form such a state.
EVOs produce a range of vacuum states that are protected and isolated by a domain wall from the cosmological Higgs field which supports the EVO's existence as an independent object. The transmutation of elements is instantaneously actioned by the magnetic vortices that project from the EVO when that vortex field contacts matter.
The repetitive pattern of transmuted matter produced by strange radiation is the result of a rotating EVO that floats over a surface where only the vortexes of the EVO contacts the matter that comprises that surface.
See Keith A Fredericks website for images of these tracks
Not agree with all but yes, plasmons and phonons can interact.. you should find on the net so many papers in this way.
One of the proofs that the EVO is a Bose condensate is the shape of the transmutation that the EVO generates. The connect between the EVO and the Bose condensate is provided by the supersolid shape of the pattern that its vortexes leaves in matter.
In condensed matter physics, a supersolid is a spatially ordered material with superfluid properties. In the case of helium-4, it has been conjectured since the 1960s that it might be possible to create a supersolid. Starting from 2017, a definitive proof for the existence of this state was provided by several experiments using atomic Bose–Einstein condensates.
A Bose condensate will take on the crystal structure of a polygon shaped solid: hexagon, triangle, or sphere.
In LENR, Mark LeClair saw that his water crystal impressed onto matter a triangular pit. See page 16 of the LeClair presentation downloaded below.
Another wonderful data point that shows how transmutation can leave polygonal shapes. This data can be found in the examination of the transmutation patterns excavated in micro diamond in the LION experiment. This experiment is great because the transmutation marks produced by the EVOs can be seen in the transparent diamond lattice.
The EVOs make matter disappear, yet at the end of the polygonal shaped tunnels that they dig we can find a small amount of transmuted matter. To me, this is proof that a Bose condensation of dressed electrons form the EVOs. There are many other EVO features that this experiment reveals if one chooses to look for them.
Another indicator of Bose Condensation in EVO construction is the patterns that the EVO leaves in the marks that it produces when it destabilizes. A hexagonal lattice shape is make visible in the transmuted matter when polarized light and filtering is used to view the marks and the area around them. In addition, Stange radiation tracks are more clearly seen in polarized light because the EVO that produced the marks is a coherent superconductive body.
